﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD with MathML3 v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article
    xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"
    xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">UJFST</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Universal Journal of Food Science and Technology</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">2995-8253</issn>
      <issn pub-type="ppub"></issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Science Publications</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.31586/ujfst.2024.1021</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">UJFST-1021</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
          <subject>Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>
          Handling Practices of Folded Vermicelli by Small-scale Processors in Tanga City, Tanzania
        </article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mbuga</surname>
<given-names>Lucas</given-names>
</name>
<xref rid="af1" ref-type="aff">1</xref>
<xref rid="af2" ref-type="aff">2</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chaula</surname>
<given-names>Davis Naboth</given-names>
</name>
<xref rid="af2" ref-type="aff">2</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kussaga</surname>
<given-names>Jamal Bakari</given-names>
</name>
<xref rid="af2" ref-type="aff">2</xref>
<xref rid="cr1" ref-type="corresp">*</xref>
</contrib>
      </contrib-group>
<aff id="af1"><label>1</label> Department of Agricultural Training and Research, Ministry of Agriculture, Mji wa Serikali-Mtumba, P. O. Box 2182, Dodoma, Tanzania</aff>
<aff id="af2"><label>2</label> Department of Food Science and Agro-processing, School of Engineering and Technology, Sokoine University of Agriculture, P. O. Box 3019, Chuo Kikuu, Morogoro, Tanzania</aff>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="c1">
<label>*</label>Corresponding author at: Department of Food Science and Agro-processing, School of Engineering and Technology, Sokoine University of Agriculture, P. O. Box 3019, Chuo Kikuu, Morogoro, Tanzania
</corresp>
</author-notes>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <day>12</day>
        <month>08</month>
        <year>2024</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>2</volume>
      <issue>1</issue>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received">
          <day>11</day>
          <month>05</month>
          <year>2024</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="rev-recd">
          <day>26</day>
          <month>07</month>
          <year>2024</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="accepted">
          <day>08</day>
          <month>08</month>
          <year>2024</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="pub">
          <day>12</day>
          <month>08</month>
          <year>2024</year>
        </date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>&#xa9; Copyright 2024 by authors and Trend Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2024</copyright-year>
        <license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
          <license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <abstract>
        This study assessed the handling and processing practices of 30 small-scale folded vermicelli processors in Tanga, specifically in urban areas of Tanga City, Tanzania. However, the micro- and small-scale processors were producing in unhygienic way because they are lacking facilities and equipment to process and handle the product hygienically. Multistage sampling design was adopted for this study and face-to-face interviews were conducted to collect data from all processing units through nine streets using semi-structured questionnaires and observation checklists. Data were analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences, where the statistics aspect was determined from the results obtained. The processors found across various streets (ranging from 3.3% in Kwaminchi Street to 23.3% in Mabawa Street), exhibited diverse demographics, with 53.3% being owner-operators and 40% and 6.7% in labourer and supervisor roles, respectively. A significant portion (53.3%) had 1-3 years of experience, and a small portion (10%) attended formal training in pasta processing. Despite 73.3% possessing food manufacturing licenses, many were unfamiliar with legal requirements, lacking documentation and standardized processes, raising concerns about food safety. Raw materials were sourced locally, but 56.7% lacked storage facilities. Hygienic practices varied, with 43.3% undergoing periodic medical check-ups, 70% using protective gear, and 60% had hand washing facilities. Sun drying was the sole method employed, with 86.7% placed drying trays on rooftops. Packaging practices raised concerns, as 93.3% reused woven polypropylene bags, potentially impacting product quality. Awareness of aflatoxin and its health implications was lacking in 90% of the processors. Overall, the study highlighted gaps in awareness, training, and adherence to standards among processors, posing potential risks to food safety and quality. Encourage them to adhere with Tanzania Bureau of Standards requirements and formalize their quality control practices.
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd-group><kwd>Processing Units; Spaghetti; Processor&#x02019;s Awareness; Aflatoxin</kwd>
</kwd-group>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec1">
<title>Introduction</title><p>Folded vermicelli is a traditional type of pasta which is commonly consumed in Tanzania. The most famous region in pasta consumption, especially the folded vermicelli is Tanga. The Arab merchants introduced Italian pasta in various countries including Tanzania [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R12">12</xref>]. Pasta consumption has become a tradition, especially in coastal areas like Tanga. However, the consumption is relatively higher during the Holy month of Ramadan, when Muslims are fasting. Although there are few large-scale pasta processing companies in the country, the micro- and small-scale units in Tanga are the major producers of folded vermicelli. The production of folded vermicelli requires wheat flour and water as the main raw materials [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R2">2</xref>]. However, the quality and safety of the final product depend on the raw materials, processing techniques and handling practices [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R52">52</xref>]. However, the micro- and small-scale companies lack facilities and equipment to process and handle the product in a hygienic way. Inadequate personal hygiene and working environment cleanliness are regarded as major routes of contamination [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R21">21</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R42">42</xref>].</p>
<p>Despite the fact that the production process of folded vermicelli is a thermal process involving steaming (pre-cooking) which kills most microorganisms, drying process and handling practices of finished products can pose a risk of cross contamination. The processors use open sun drying method, whereby uncovered folded vermicelli in trays is placed on rooftops and/or on ground/floors for two days. They lack equipment and tools to assess the moisture content in dried products. Their products may be packed while are not properly dried either in new or used woven polypropylene bags, often without any cleaning intervention. These practices may create a potential route of products contamination with various hazards [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R48">48</xref>]. If folded vermicelli are dried for long time or packed while not well dried, there is a potential risk of growth of mycotoxigenic fungi that may also produce mycotoxins. Several studies have reported the presence of aflatoxins in wheat and its products like pasta, where aflatoxin B<sub>1</sub> (AFB<sub>1</sub>) was reported in 47.8% of studies in the last five years, between 2015 to 2020 [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R41">41</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R45">45</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R47">47</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R56">56</xref>].</p>
<p>Even though the fact that folded vermicelli processors are small-scale, indeed they must ensure the safety of food products to prevent food borne diseases [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R53">53</xref>]. Although some studies have been conducted to assess handling practices in fish [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R29">29</xref>] and dairy [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R30">30</xref>] processing companies little has been done in pasta processing companies. Therefore, this study intend to assess the handling and processing practices in folded vermicelli by small-scale processors in Tanga City. The findings from this study will be useful to food control authorities and other stakeholders to set up control strategies to small-scale processors in the country.</p>
</sec><sec id="sec2">
<title>Materials and Methods</title><title>2.1. Description of the Study Area</title><p>The study was conducted in Tanga City, in Tanga District (Figure 1). Tanga is one of eleven administrative districts of Tanga Region&#x26;#x000a0;in&#x26;#x000a0;Tanzania. The district covers an area of&#x26;#x000a0;596.5&#x26;#x000a0;km<sup>2 </sup>of which includes the historic city of Tanga and the port of Tanga. Geographically, Tanga is located on coordinates: 06<sup>0</sup>57&#x26;#x0201d; south and 37<sup>0</sup>32&#x26;#x0201d; east. Tanga District is bordered to the north by Mkinga District, to the east by the Indian Ocean, to the south and west by Muheza District. It has an average temperature of 24.6<sup>0</sup>C and 935 mm of rainfall per year, and the area is classified under tropical-climate. The district is the administrative and economic centre of the region. According to the 2022 National Census statistics; the city has a total population of approximately 245,182 people. The district is famous in production and consumption of pasta especially folded vermicelli. Nine streets from nine administrative wards in Tanga City were involved in this study.</p>
<fig id="fig1">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Map of Tanga City showing the study sites where respondents obtained in Tanga District (Source: Authors).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="1021.fig.001" />
</fig><title>2.2. Sampling Design</title><p>Multistage sampling design was implemented in this study [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R1">1</xref>]. In summary, three divisions (Chumbageni, Ngamiani Kaskazini and Ngamiani Kati) were purposefully selected among the four divisions of Tanga City. Nine administrative wards out of 27 wards, namely, Chumbageni, Duga, Mabawa, Ngamiani Kaskazini, Makorora, Msambweni, Central, Ngamiani Kati and Ngamiani Kusini were also purposefully selected. The wards selected were those with at least one folded vermicelli processing company. Then, all the streets with the folded vermicelli processors were taken from each of the chosen wards, as indicated in the sampling plan (Figure 2). Finally, 30 small-scale processors were selected from each street (n=30). </p>
<p>The sample size was estimated by using the Kothari equation [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R28">28</xref>].</p>

<disp-formula id="FD1"><div class="html-disp-formula-info"><div class="f"><math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mi>n</mi><mo>=</mo><mfrac><mrow><msup><mrow><mi>Z</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn><mi mathvariant="normal"> </mi><mi mathvariant="normal">*</mi></mrow></msup><mi>P</mi><mfenced separators="|"><mrow><mn>1</mn><mo>-</mo><mi>P</mi></mrow></mfenced></mrow><mrow><msup><mrow><mi>e</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msup></mrow></mfrac></mrow></semantics></math></div><div class="l"><label>(1)</label></div></div></disp-formula><p>Where; <italic>n</italic> = the required sample size, <italic>Z</italic> = the level of statistically significant at 95% confidence interval = 1.96, <italic>P </italic>= the percentage occurrence of a state or condition = 5%, and <italic>e</italic> = the percentage maximum marginal error required = &#x26;#x000b1;8% for this study. </p>

<inline-formula><math><semantics><mrow><mi>n</mi><mo>=</mo><mfrac><mrow><msup><mrow><mfenced separators="|"><mrow><mn>1.96</mn></mrow></mfenced></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msup><mi mathvariant="normal"> </mi><mi mathvariant="normal">x</mi><mi mathvariant="normal"> </mi><mn>0.05</mn><mfenced separators="|"><mrow><mn>1</mn><mi mathvariant="normal"> </mi><mo>-</mo><mn>0.05</mn></mrow></mfenced></mrow><mrow><msup><mrow><mfenced separators="|"><mrow><mn>0.08</mn></mrow></mfenced></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msup></mrow></mfrac><mo>=</mo><mi mathvariant="normal"> </mi><mn>28.5118</mn><mo>…</mo><mo>≈</mo><mi mathvariant="normal"> </mi><mn>30</mn><mi mathvariant="normal"> </mi><mi mathvariant="normal">r</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">e</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">s</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">p</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">o</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">n</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">d</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">e</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">n</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">t</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">s</mi></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula><fig id="fig2">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption>
<p>A sampling plan for small-scale processors obtained from streets of Magomeni, Central, Kwaminchi, Mabawa, Makorora Kati, Msambweni, Swahili, Msikiti and Azimio in Tanga City (Source: Authors).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="1021.fig.002" />
</fig><title>2.3. Survey of small-scale folded vermicelli processor&#x02019;s awareness on handling and processing practices </title><p>Face-to-face interviews were conducted to assess the handling and processing practices through nine streets. Information was collected from each respondent, a total of 30 respondents were interviewed from 30 small-scale folded vermicelli processors using a semi-structured questionnaire and the observation checklists. Information was collected from each company. All processing units in Tanga City were involved in this research study. </p>
<title>2.4. Statistical Data Analysis</title><p>Data from the questionnaires were processed by editing, coding and analyzing by using a Statistical Package for Social Sciences (IBM SPSS Version 25, Chicago, IL. USA). Descriptive statistic was employed. The data were then presented as frequencies and percentages.</p>
</sec><sec id="sec3">
<title>Results and Discussion</title><title>3.1. Demographic characteristics of respondents</title><p>The majority (70%) of respondents were male, indicating a gender disparity in the industry (Table 1). This could be attributed to the nature of the business and associated activities (lifting, mixing/molding), which favoured masculine. These findings contradict those of earlier studies where Hassan and Fweja [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R20">20</xref>] report that 67.5% of the food street vendors are females. Likewise, the findings from the study by Rabia [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R43">43</xref>] reveal that 74.8% of the processors are males, and Masunzu [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R34">34</xref>] reports that 80% are males. In terms of age distribution, a significant portion of processors fell in the 31-40 age group (43.3%), followed by those above 50 (26.7%). This data indicated a diverse age group within the processing industry, with a considerable number of more experienced individuals. With regards to education level, the majority of processors had secondary (43.3%), followed by primary school (40%) education. These findings agree with Ali [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R3">3</xref>], who reveal that the majority (61.5%) of respondents have accomplished secondary school. However, they contrast with the findings reported by Chijoriga [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R11">11</xref>], which highlight that 64% of small and micro enterprises (SMEs) have vocational education in food processing. It was also observed that the businesses were predominantly dominated by owners (53.3%). The processing seemed to be mostly ran by the owners themselves, with few positions for labourers (40%) and supervisors (6.7%). This could impact the overall management and quality control within the businesses. The majority of processors (53.3%) had 1-3 years of experience in the industry, while just 16.7% had more than 7 years, demonstrating a range of skill levels. Experience adds value to the work and can determine SMEs ability to upgrade [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R31">31</xref>]. A relatively small portion (10%) of processors were attended a training course, specifically a seminar on pasta production held at Zanzibar for one week. They had acquired additional knowledge and skills relevant to the production of folded vermicelli. According to Osei and Anfu [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R40">40</xref>], point out that due to infrastructure problems and a lack of knowledge, small food enterprises have difficulty implementing food safety management systems. All owners and employees working in food premises, including temporary employees, should be trained on the basics of food safety principles and practices required to prevent contamination [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R14">14</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R15">15</xref>].</p>
<table-wrap id="tab1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption>
<p><b></b> Demographic characteristics of respondents (n = 30)</p>
</caption>

<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="center"><bold>Variable</bold></th>
<th align="center"><bold>Respondents/categories</bold></th>
<th align="center"><bold>Frequency</bold></th>
<th align="center"><bold>Percent (%)</bold></th>
<th align="center"></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="center">Gender</td>
<td align="center">Male</td>
<td align="center">21</td>
<td align="center">70.0</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">Female</td>
<td align="center">9</td>
<td align="center">30.0</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Age (in years)</td>
<td align="center">&lt; 18</td>
<td align="center">0</td>
<td align="center">0.0</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">18 &#x02013; 30</td>
<td align="center">5</td>
<td align="center">16.7</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">31 &#x02013; 40</td>
<td align="center">13</td>
<td align="center">43.3</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">41 &#x02013; 50 </td>
<td align="center">4</td>
<td align="center">13.3</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">&#x00026;gt; 50</td>
<td align="center">8</td>
<td align="center">26.7</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Education level</td>
<td align="center">Non formal</td>
<td align="center">3</td>
<td align="center">10.0</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">Primary</td>
<td align="center">12</td>
<td align="center">40.0</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">Secondary </td>
<td align="center">13</td>
<td align="center">43.3</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">Vocational Training</td>
<td align="center">2</td>
<td align="center">6.7</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Work position</td>
<td align="center">Owner</td>
<td align="center">16</td>
<td align="center">53.3</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">Supervisor</td>
<td align="center">2</td>
<td align="center">6.7</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">Labourer</td>
<td align="center">12</td>
<td align="center">40.0</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Work experience (in years)</td>
<td align="center">&lt; 1</td>
<td align="center">2</td>
<td align="center">6.7</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">1 &#x02013; 3 </td>
<td align="center">16</td>
<td align="center">53.3</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">4 &#x02013; 6 </td>
<td align="center">7</td>
<td align="center">23.3</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">&#x00026;#707; 7</td>
<td align="center">5</td>
<td align="center">16.7</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Training course</td>
<td align="center">Yes </td>
<td align="center">3</td>
<td align="center">10.0</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">No </td>
<td align="center">27</td>
<td align="center">90.0</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" colspan="4">
<hr />
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>

</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap><p></p>
<title>3.2. Characteristics of the small-scale processing units </title><p>The distribution of processors across different streets in the urban areas of Tanga City was varied. The proportions of processors in each street were Mabawa (23.3%), Msambweni (16.7%), Central (13.3%), and Azimio (13.3%) (Table 2). This variation could have been due to easy accessibility to resources, market demand, and/or historical factors. A significant majority (73.3%) of processors held valid food manufacturing licenses from either the Municipal Council or Tanzania Bureau of Standards (TBS) (formerly, Tanzania Food and Drugs Authority-TFDA), which was crucial for ensuring the safety and quality of the food products they produced. Though, none of the processors had registered their companies, indicating that all were operating informally. This is reliable with a study by Ruteri [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R44">44</xref>] reveal that micro and small food processors in Tanzania operate in the informal sector, employing labour-intensive methods and utilizing inadequate technologies.</p>
<p>In addition, seventy percent of the processors had fewer than 10 employees, while 30% had between 10 and 49 employees (Table 2). The number of employees depended on the scale of production and the available resources, indicating that they were truly categorized as small-scale entrepreneurs. A significant portion of the companies (73.3%) were inspected, with 36.7% being inspected three times a year. Company inspections were critical for quality control and ensuring compliance with food safety standards. TBS and government health officers inspected the processor&#x26;#x02019;s companies on a number of activities, including the general cleanliness of premises, facilities and personal hygiene, building maintenance and sewerage repair, routine medical check-up, wearing of protective gears and proper uniforms, and business licenses. Processors undergoing inspections have a better understanding of the importance of quality and safety standards in food production [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R39">39</xref>]. Production frequency varied; 70% processed three days a week, while others operated more frequently as shown inTable <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab2">2</xref>. Daily production ranged from 1-30 bags for 70% of processors to 31-100 bags for 30%, influenced by equipment, workforce, and market needs. Only one processor achieved high production of about 98 bags per day, indicating advanced resources and high demand. </p>
<table-wrap id="tab2">
<label>Table 2</label>
<caption>
<p><b></b> Characteristics of the small-scale processing units</p>
</caption>

<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="center"><bold>Variable</bold></th>
<th align="center"><bold>Respondents/categories</bold></th>
<th align="center"><bold>Frequency</bold></th>
<th align="center"><bold>Percent (%)</bold></th>
<th align="center"></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="center">Location (Streets)</td>
<td align="center">Magomeni</td>
<td align="center">2</td>
<td align="center">6.7</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">Mabawa</td>
<td align="center">7</td>
<td align="center">23.3</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">Azimio</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
<td align="center">13.3</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">Swahili</td>
<td align="center">2</td>
<td align="center">6.7</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">Msikiti</td>
<td align="center">2</td>
<td align="center">6.7</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">Makorora Kati</td>
<td align="center">3</td>
<td align="center">10.0</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">Msambweni</td>
<td align="center">5</td>
<td align="center">16.7</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">Central</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
<td align="center">13.3</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">Kwaminchi</td>
<td align="center">1</td>
<td align="center">3.3</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Company registration</td>
<td align="center">No </td>
<td align="center">30</td>
<td align="center">100.0</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Food manufacturing license</td>
<td align="center">Yes </td>
<td align="center">22</td>
<td align="center">73.3</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">No</td>
<td align="center">8</td>
<td align="center">26.7</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Number of employees</td>
<td align="center">&lt; 10</td>
<td align="center">21</td>
<td align="center">70.0</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">10 &#x02013; 49</td>
<td align="center">9</td>
<td align="center">30.0</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">&#x00026;gt; 50</td>
<td align="center">0</td>
<td align="center">0.0</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Company inspection</td>
<td align="center">Yes </td>
<td align="center">22</td>
<td align="center">73.3</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">No</td>
<td align="center">8</td>
<td align="center">26.7</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Inspection frequency (in years)</td>
<td align="center">Twice</td>
<td align="center">7</td>
<td align="center">23.3</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">Three times</td>
<td align="center">11</td>
<td align="center">36.7</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">&#x00026;gt; three times</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
<td align="center">13.3</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Production frequency per week</td>
<td align="center">7 days</td>
<td align="center">3</td>
<td align="center">10.0</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">6 days</td>
<td align="center">6</td>
<td align="center">20.0</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">3 days</td>
<td align="center">21</td>
<td align="center">70.0</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Quantity produced per day (in bags)</td>
<td align="center">0 &#x02013; 30</td>
<td align="center">21</td>
<td align="center">70.0</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">31 &#x02013; 100 </td>
<td align="center">9</td>
<td align="center">30.0</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" colspan="4">
<hr />
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>

</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap><p></p>
<title>3.3. Handling of raw materials</title><p>The study showed that all processors sourced their raw materials from local markets, emphasizing quality (90%) in their selection process (Table 3). Though visual checks could identify obvious contaminants like dirt or foreign objects, they cannot detect invisible threats such as bacteria, viruses, or chemical residues [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R50">50</xref>]. Prioritizing quality over price in raw material selection was a positive practice in food production, as quality raw materials were essential for producing safe and high-quality food products. Price-conscious decisions may have been a result of cost constraints but could sometimes compromise quality.</p>
<table-wrap id="tab3">
<label>Table 3</label>
<caption>
<p><b></b> Handling of raw materials by processors</p>
</caption>

<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="center"><bold>Variable</bold></th>
<th align="center"><bold>Respondents/ categories</bold></th>
<th align="center"><bold>Frequency</bold></th>
<th align="center"><bold>Percent (%)</bold></th>
<th align="center"></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="center">Are raw materials purchased from local  markets?</td>
<td align="center">Yes </td>
<td align="center">30</td>
<td align="center">100.0</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">For what factor?</td>
<td align="center">Quality</td>
<td align="center">27</td>
<td align="center">90.0</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">Price</td>
<td align="center">3</td>
<td align="center">10.0</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Do you have store?</td>
<td align="center">Yes</td>
<td align="center">13</td>
<td align="center">43.3</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">No </td>
<td align="center">17</td>
<td align="center">56.7</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Is there any spoilage problem for stored raw  materials?</td>
<td align="center">Yes</td>
<td align="center">5</td>
<td align="center">16.7</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">No</td>
<td align="center">25</td>
<td align="center">83.3</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Possible sources of spoilage</td>
<td align="center">Moisture</td>
<td align="center">3</td>
<td align="center">10.0</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">Insects/rodent</td>
<td align="center">2</td>
<td align="center">6.7</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Is the TUWSSA taken as the source of water  (tap water) used?</td>
<td align="center">Yes </td>
<td align="center">30</td>
<td align="center">100.0</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" colspan="4">
<hr />
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>

</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap><p></p>
<p>Over half (56.7%) of processors lacked proper storage facilities (Table 3), instead storing raw materials at home or within processing areas. Proper storage is essential for preventing spoilage and maintaining raw material quality, but financial limitations or lack of awareness might hinder the establishment of such facilities [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R18">18</xref>]. The data showed that only 16.7% of processors reported spoilage problems, with moisture (10%) being a common cause. Effective storage practices are vital for minimizing spoilage and maintaining food safety, as inadequate storage can lead to contamination and health risks [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R25">25</xref>]. Overall, improving storage conditions could enhance quality and reduce food loss, addressing potential threats to consumer health [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R4">4</xref>]. </p>
<title>3.4. Hygiene and sanitation practices </title><p>The study found that only 43.3% of processors underwent periodic medical check-ups (Table 4), possibly due to cost constraints or a lack of awareness regarding their importance. Employees with infectious diseases can contaminate food through direct contact or by tainting surfaces, utensils, and equipment, thereby increasing the risk of foodborne illnesses [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R13">13</xref>]. A small portion (20%) had designated changing or dressing rooms, which are crucial for preventing contamination by ensuring work clothes remain clean. The availability of these facilities might be influenced by space constraints or awareness of their importance. About 70% of processors wore protective gear such as aprons, gloves, and hairnets, which is essential for maintaining hygiene and preventing contamination of food [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R49">49</xref>]. More than half (60%) of processors had hand washing facilities, which are essential for preventing the spread of pathogens. Hand washing was performed after key activities such as using the toilet (46.7%), shaking hands (16.7%), and blowing the nose (23.3%), which aligns with good hygienic practices to minimize contamination risks. </p>
<p>Processors used coconut or cooking oil for machine cleaning (Table 4), which prevents rust and ensures smooth operation, but none used additional water treatment methods, possibly relying on the quality of their tap water. For waste disposal, 86.7% used communal municipal collection points, and 13.3% burned waste, demonstrating efforts to maintain cleanliness and prevent environmental contamination [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R22">22</xref>]. </p>
<table-wrap id="tab4">
<label>Table 4</label>
<caption>
<p><b></b> Hygiene and sanitation practices of the processors</p>
</caption>

<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="center"><bold>Variable</bold></th>
<th align="center"><bold>Respondents/ categories</bold></th>
<th align="center"><bold>Frequency</bold></th>
<th align="center"><bold>Percent (%)</bold></th>
<th align="center"></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="center">Is the periodical medical check-up  conducted?</td>
<td align="center">Yes</td>
<td align="center">13</td>
<td align="center">43.3</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">No</td>
<td align="center">17</td>
<td align="center">56.7</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Do you have changing/dressing room?</td>
<td align="center">Yes</td>
<td align="center">6</td>
<td align="center">20.0</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">No</td>
<td align="center">24</td>
<td align="center">80.0</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Do you wear the protective gears?</td>
<td align="center">Yes</td>
<td align="center">21</td>
<td align="center">70.0</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">No </td>
<td align="center">9</td>
<td align="center">30.0</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Do you have toilet(s)? </td>
<td align="center">Yes</td>
<td align="center">30</td>
<td align="center">100.0</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Do you have hand washing facilities?</td>
<td align="center">Yes</td>
<td align="center">18</td>
<td align="center">60.0</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">No</td>
<td align="center">12</td>
<td align="center">40.0</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">At what time do you wash your hands?</td>
<td align="center">After visiting toilets </td>
<td align="center">14</td>
<td align="center">46.7</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">After hand shaking with others </td>
<td align="center">5</td>
<td align="center">16.7</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">After blowing nose</td>
<td align="center">7</td>
<td align="center">23.3</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">Before starting processing</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
<td align="center">13.3</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Is unnecessary foot traffic not allowed in  processing areas?</td>
<td align="center">Yes</td>
<td align="center">3</td>
<td align="center">10.0</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">No</td>
<td align="center">27</td>
<td align="center">90.0</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Do you clean machines?</td>
<td align="center">Yes</td>
<td align="center">30</td>
<td align="center">100.0</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Is coconut/cooking oil used for cleaning  machines? </td>
<td align="center">Yes </td>
<td align="center">30</td>
<td align="center">100.0</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Which water used for cleaning? </td>
<td align="center">Normal potable water</td>
<td align="center">30</td>
<td align="center">100.0</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">The drying facilities cleaned by</td>
<td align="center">Sweeping with HBBM</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
<td align="center">13.3</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">Sweeping with HBB</td>
<td align="center">26</td>
<td align="center">86.7</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Do you have any water treatment?</td>
<td align="center">No</td>
<td align="center">30</td>
<td align="center">100.0</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">How do you dispose your waste?</td>
<td align="center">In communal municipal collection points </td>
<td align="center">26</td>
<td align="center">86.7</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">Burn at home waste pit </td>
<td align="center">4</td>
<td align="center">13.3</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" colspan="4">
<hr />
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>

</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap><p></p>
<title>3.4.1 Manufacturing process of folded vermicelli </title><p>Nowadays, pasta is processed by continuous, high-capacity extruders that operate on the auger extrusion principle, combining kneading and extrusion in a single operation [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R8">8</xref>]. The production of folded vermicelli by small-scale processors in Tanga City involved the following steps:</p>
<p><italic><bold>Mixing and kneading</bold></italic><bold>:</bold> Wheat flour and water were mixed in precise proportions in a mixer to form a pasta dough. The dough was then kneaded with water at a temperature of 20 to 30&#x26;#x000b0;C.</p>
<p><italic><bold>Extrusion</bold></italic><bold>:</bold> Once the stiff dough was uniformly mixed and formed, it was fed into a sheeter and former machine to create dough plates. These plates were then passed through a die machine under high pressure to produce a wide variety of vermicelli, with the shape and size of the die adjusted accordingly.</p>
<p><italic><bold>Steaming and folding</bold></italic><bold>: </bold>The sized and shaped vermicelli were placed into pasteurizer tanks/vessels for thermal treatment, typically for 1 to 1&#x26;#x000bd; hours to reach a pre-cooking condition. Most processors used gas combustion to boil water for steam production, although one processor used crude oil combustion, which posed a serious environmental issue with smoke disposal. After steaming, the partially cooked vermicelli were folded into their final shapes (folded vermicelli) and prepared for the drying process. Thermal treatment not only ensures safety by reducing microbial populations and altering the pasta structure through water activity reduction, but it also leads to unwanted modifications [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R19">19</xref>].</p>
<p><italic><bold>Drying</bold></italic><bold>: </bold>Special attention is given to the final step of the pasta-making process: the drying step. It is well-known that the drying process gives dry pasta its desired physical and chemical stability and allows it to have a longer shelf life [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R10">10</xref>]. The drying time is also crucial, as over-drying can cause the pasta to break down, while drying too slowly increases the risk of spoilage [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R52">52</xref>]. The formed folded vermicelli were placed on drying trays and then left on rooftops or on the floor/ground for two days, which was sufficient drying time if there was enough sunlight.</p>
<p><italic><bold>Weighing and packaging</bold></italic><bold>: </bold>The dried folded vermicelli was weighed according to the processor's decision and customer requirements, and then packaged in either new or used woven Polypropylene bags. The packaged folded vermicelli was then ready for sale.</p>
<title>3.5. Processing and drying practices of folded vermicelli</title><p>The study revealed that all processors engaged in seasonal and batch production, particularly during the Holy month of Ramadan due to heightened customer demand (Table 5). Some continued production post-Ramadan based on customer orders. All processors employed a semi-automated system, combining manual and machine tasks, which is typical for small-scale food processing due to its affordability and suitability for lower production volumes. However, product quality often varied due to inadequate quality control facilities, a lack of awareness about their importance, and substandard manufacturing practices. </p>
<p>Sun drying was the primary method used for drying folded vermicelli, aligning with finding by Sasongko <italic>et al</italic>. [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R46">46</xref>] in Indonesia that also highlighted the reliance on sunlight for small to medium enterprises. This method&#x26;#x02019;s effectiveness is contingent on weather conditions, which affects drying continuity and vermicelli quality [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R46">46</xref>]. Most processors (86.7%) dried their product on rooftops, benefiting from direct sunlight and airflow, while 13.3% used both rooftops and the ground due to space limitations. Processors generally did not cover the vermicelli during drying, preferring open-air exposure despite risks of contamination from dust and bird droppings. Drying typically took two days, with an additional day using an expensive charcoal oven if weather conditions were poor. Dryness was checked manually by inserting a finger into the folded vermicelli, as no moisture meters were used (Table 5). Manual inspection by touch is a practical and effective method commonly used in food processing to determine the dryness of pasta especially folded vermicelli [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R55">55</xref>]. </p>
<p>The main challenge faced by processors was the laborious task of moving trays to and from rooftops (43.3%), especially in adverse weather, reflecting the constraints of limited resources and infrastructure (Table 5). Understanding these practices and challenges is essential for enhancing folded vermicelli production efficiency and quality in small-scale operations. </p>
<table-wrap id="tab5">
<label>Table 5</label>
<caption>
<p><b></b> Processing and drying practices of folded vermicelli</p>
</caption>

<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="center"><bold>Variable</bold></th>
<th align="center"><bold>Respondents/ categories</bold></th>
<th align="center"><bold>Frequency</bold></th>
<th align="center"><bold>Percent (%)</bold></th>
<th align="center"></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="center">Seasonal production </td>
<td align="center">Yes </td>
<td align="center">30</td>
<td align="center">100.0</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Processing machines/ work used</td>
<td align="center">Semi-automated machines/ work</td>
<td align="center">30</td>
<td align="center">100.0</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Drying method used </td>
<td align="center">Sun drying</td>
<td align="center">30</td>
<td align="center">100.0</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">Oven drying</td>
<td align="center">0</td>
<td align="center">0.0</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">Cabinet dryer</td>
<td align="center">0</td>
<td align="center">0.0</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Where do you put it when dries on the sun?</td>
<td align="center">On roof tops</td>
<td align="center">26</td>
<td align="center">86.7</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;  On rooftops and on ground/ floor</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
<td align="center">13.3</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Do you cover folded vermicelli when drying?</td>
<td align="center">No</td>
<td align="center">30</td>
<td align="center">100.0</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Drying period </td>
<td align="center">Two days</td>
<td align="center">30</td>
<td align="center">100.0</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Dryness identification </td>
<td align="center">By inserting a finger inside a folded  vermicelli </td>
<td align="center">30</td>
<td align="center">100.0</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">By using a moisture meter</td>
<td align="center">0</td>
<td align="center">0.0</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Challenges experienced in drying process</td>
<td align="center">Lack of cover-materials when drying</td>
<td align="center">5</td>
<td align="center">16.7</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">Hard work to put trays on roof tops</td>
<td align="center">13</td>
<td align="center">43.3</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">Lack of dryer</td>
<td align="center">3</td>
<td align="center">10.0</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">Tedious work in monitoring activity</td>
<td align="center">7</td>
<td align="center">23.3</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">Expensive when use of oven charcoal drier</td>
<td align="center">2</td>
<td align="center">6.7</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" colspan="4">
<hr />
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>

</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap><p></p>
<title>3.6. Quality control of the end products</title><p>Despite their extensive experience, none of the processors were familiar with the specific requirements set by the Tanzania Bureau of Standards (TBS) (Table 6). Instead, they relied on common sense to evaluate the quality of their products, such as folded vermicelli, which could pose food safety risks. None of the processors had formal working instructions, operating procedures, or a pasta processing flow chart, relying instead on habitual practices. This lack of formal documentation suggested inconsistent quality control and an increased risk of cross-contamination. Only 23.3% of processors maintained medical examination records for their employees, a situation attributed to the costs of medical exams and insufficient awareness of workplace health and safety requirements. Additionally, none maintained records for cleaning and disinfection schedules, indicating a potential lack of systematic cleaning practices and possibly limited awareness or resources for effective sanitation. </p>
<p>Product safety assurance involves ensuring quality in raw materials and critical processing elements, with validated and monitored processes to uphold food safety [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R9">9</xref>]. While all processors claimed to use good quality raw materials (Table 6), only 26.7% adhered to Good Hygienic Practices (GHP) and 20% to Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP), suggesting room for improvement in ensuring product consistency and safety [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R16">16</xref>]. Eight percent of processors did not comply with GMP, risking product quality and safety issues. Packaging and storage practices also needed enhancement. Only 6.7% used new, quality packaging materials, while 93.3% reused woven polypropylene (PP) bags, potentially compromising product quality (Table 6). Approximately 56.7% reported proper storage conditions, which helps maintain product quality. Good raw materials are vital, but inadequate hygiene practices, manufacturing processes, and packaging could lead to contamination and spoilage, particularly in tropical climates like Tanzania. </p>
<table-wrap id="tab6">
<label>Table 6</label>
<caption>
<p><b></b> Quality control of the end products</p>
</caption>

<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="center"><bold>Variable</bold></th>
<th align="center"><bold>Respondents/ categories</bold></th>
<th align="center"><bold>Frequency</bold></th>
<th align="center"><bold>Percent (%)</bold></th>
<th align="center"></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="center">Do you meet specific requirements as per  TBS?</td>
<td align="center">No</td>
<td align="center">30</td>
<td align="center">100.0</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Do you have working instructions and  operating procedures?</td>
<td align="center">No</td>
<td align="center">30</td>
<td align="center">100.0</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Do you have pasta processing flow chart?</td>
<td align="center">No </td>
<td align="center">30</td>
<td align="center">100.0</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Do you have medical examination records?</td>
<td align="center">Yes </td>
<td align="center">7</td>
<td align="center">23.3</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">No </td>
<td align="center">23</td>
<td align="center">76.7</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Do you have cleaning and disinfestation  schedule records?</td>
<td align="center">No</td>
<td align="center">30</td>
<td align="center">100.0</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Product safety assurance:</td>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Using good raw materials</td>
<td align="center">Yes</td>
<td align="center">30</td>
<td align="center">100.0</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">No</td>
<td align="center">0</td>
<td align="center">0.0</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Conduct GHP</td>
<td align="center">Yes </td>
<td align="center">8</td>
<td align="center">26.7</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">No</td>
<td align="center">22</td>
<td align="center">73.3</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Conduct GMP</td>
<td align="center">Yes</td>
<td align="center">6</td>
<td align="center">20.0</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">No</td>
<td align="center">24</td>
<td align="center">80.0</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Proper product packaging</td>
<td align="center">Yes</td>
<td align="center">2</td>
<td align="center">6.7</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">No</td>
<td align="center">28</td>
<td align="center">93.3</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Proper product storage</td>
<td align="center">Yes</td>
<td align="center">17</td>
<td align="center">56.7</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">No</td>
<td align="center">13</td>
<td align="center">43.3</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" colspan="4">
<hr />
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>

</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap><p></p>
<title>3.7. Packaging and labeling information of the final products </title><p>The study found that all processors engaged in production packaging (Table 7), which is a positive practice. However, none used polyethylene (PE) bags, and the majority (93.3%) reused woven polypropylene (PP) bags, which can lead to contamination and brittleness during handling. Azahar <italic>et al</italic>. [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R7">7</xref>] observed similar practices among Malay SMEs in Malacca, where inexpensive packaging materials often resulted in poor packaging and labeling. Only 6.7% of processors used new woven PP bags with labels. Food-grade packaging is essential to maintain the hygienic, nutritional, and sensory qualities of pasta products. Bag weights varied: 20% used 12.5 kg bags, 40% used 12 kg bags, 16.7% used 11 kg bags, and 23.3% used 10 kg bags, reflecting market demand and consumer preferences.</p>
<p>Most processors (76.7%) sealed bags with machines to prevent contamination and tampering. Sealing the bags is important to prevent air, moisture, and other external contaminants from entering, which can affect the product's quality [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R23">23</xref>]. Only 6.7% used product labels, which are vital for providing branding, product details, and instructions, likely due to cost constraints or lack of awareness. Only 6.7% included production and expiry dates, and 3.3% had batch numbers. Proper labeling and batch tracking are crucial for safety, consumer information, and regulatory compliance [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R17">17</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R36">36</xref>]. </p>
<table-wrap id="tab7">
<label>Table 7</label>
<caption>
<p><b></b> Packaging and labeling information of the final products</p>
</caption>

<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="center"><bold>Variable</bold></th>
<th align="center"><bold>Respondents/ categories</bold></th>
<th align="center"><bold>Frequency</bold></th>
<th align="center"><bold>Percent (%)</bold></th>
<th align="center"></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="center">Product packaging </td>
<td align="center">Yes</td>
<td align="center">30</td>
<td align="center">100.0</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Type of packaging materials used</td>
<td align="center">New PP bags </td>
<td align="center">2</td>
<td align="center">6.7</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">Used PP bags</td>
<td align="center">28</td>
<td align="center">93.3</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">Used PE bags</td>
<td align="center">0</td>
<td align="center">00.0</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Weight of packaged bag (in kg)</td>
<td align="center">12.5</td>
<td align="center">6</td>
<td align="center">20.0</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">12</td>
<td align="center">12</td>
<td align="center">.40.0</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">11</td>
<td align="center">5</td>
<td align="center">16.7</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">10</td>
<td align="center">7</td>
<td align="center">23.3</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Sealing of the packaged bags</td>
<td align="center">Yes</td>
<td align="center">23</td>
<td align="center">76.7</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">No</td>
<td align="center">7</td>
<td align="center">23.3</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Product label</td>
<td align="center">Yes</td>
<td align="center">2</td>
<td align="center">6.7</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">No</td>
<td align="center">28</td>
<td align="center">93.3</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Production and expiry date </td>
<td align="center">Yes</td>
<td align="center">2</td>
<td align="center">6.7</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">No</td>
<td align="center">28</td>
<td align="center">93.3</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Batch number</td>
<td align="center">Yes</td>
<td align="center">1</td>
<td align="center">3.3</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">No</td>
<td align="center">29</td>
<td align="center">96.7</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Manufacture name and contact address</td>
<td align="center">Yes</td>
<td align="center">2</td>
<td align="center">6.7</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">No</td>
<td align="center">28</td>
<td align="center">93.3</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" colspan="4">
<hr />
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>

</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap><p></p>
<title>3.8. Storage of final products and market information </title><p>Approximately 43.3% of processors had storage facilities (Table 8), either at home or within their processing areas. Adequate storage is vital for maintaining food quality and safety. Limited storage often results in poor ventilation and a dusty environment, which can affect worker health, highlighting the need for better storage solutions [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R44">44</xref>]. Half (50%) of processors stored products for less than 1 month, 30% for 1 to 3 months, and 20% for 4 to 6 months, with none storing for over 6 months. Shorter storage durations are beneficial for quality and safety. About 16.7% of processors reported spoilage issues, often due to inadequate storage and pest problems [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R5">5</xref>]. Most products (63.3%) were sold to retailers and individuals, who are the primary customers due to the small-scale nature of the processors. Complaints were received by 46.7% of processors, with the most common issue being product brittleness (26.7%). Few processors (20%) managed returns properly, with some destroying or repurposing them as animal feed. Effective storage and complaint management are crucial for ensuring product quality and safety. </p>
<table-wrap id="tab8">
<label>Table 8</label>
<caption>
<p><b></b> Storage of final products and market information</p>
</caption>

<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="center"><bold>Variable</bold></th>
<th align="center"><bold>Respondents/ categories</bold></th>
<th align="center"><bold>Frequency</bold></th>
<th align="center"><bold>Percent (%)</bold></th>
<th align="center"></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="center">Do you have store for final products?</td>
<td align="center">Yes </td>
<td align="center">13</td>
<td align="center">43.3</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">No </td>
<td align="center">17</td>
<td align="center">56.7</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Products stored until next season</td>
<td align="center">Yes</td>
<td align="center">0</td>
<td align="center">0.0</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">No</td>
<td align="center">30</td>
<td align="center">100.0</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Storage duration (in month)</td>
<td align="center">&lt; 1</td>
<td align="center">15</td>
<td align="center">50.0</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">1 &#x02013; 3 </td>
<td align="center">9</td>
<td align="center">30.0</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">4 &#x02013; 6 </td>
<td align="center">6</td>
<td align="center">20.0</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">&#x00026;gt; 6</td>
<td align="center">0</td>
<td align="center">0.0</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Spoilage problems of stored products </td>
<td align="center">Yes </td>
<td align="center">5</td>
<td align="center">16.7</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">No</td>
<td align="center">25</td>
<td align="center">83.3</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Possible sources of spoilage</td>
<td align="center">Moulds</td>
<td align="center">3</td>
<td align="center">10.0</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">Insects/ rodents</td>
<td align="center">2</td>
<td align="center">6.7</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Customers </td>
<td align="center">Wholesalers, retailers and individual</td>
<td align="center">8</td>
<td align="center">26.7</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">Wholesalers and retailers</td>
<td align="center">3</td>
<td align="center">10.0</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">Retailers and individual</td>
<td align="center">19</td>
<td align="center">63.3</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Do you receive any complaint from customers?</td>
<td align="center">Yes </td>
<td align="center">14</td>
<td align="center">46.7</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">No</td>
<td align="center">16</td>
<td align="center">53.3</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">What kind of complaint?</td>
<td align="center">Inadequate dried products</td>
<td align="center">2</td>
<td align="center">6.7</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">Easy breakage/brittle products </td>
<td align="center">8</td>
<td align="center">26.7</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">Foreign matter contamination</td>
<td align="center">3</td>
<td align="center">10.0</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">Discoloration of the products </td>
<td align="center">1</td>
<td align="center">3.3</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Have customers return products?</td>
<td align="center">Yes</td>
<td align="center">6</td>
<td align="center">20.0</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">No</td>
<td align="center">24</td>
<td align="center">80.0</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">What you do for returned products?</td>
<td align="center">Receive and destroy it</td>
<td align="center">2</td>
<td align="center">6.7</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">Use/sell as animal/chicken feed</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
<td align="center">13.3</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" colspan="4">
<hr />
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>

</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap><p></p>
<title>3.9. Processor&#x02019;s awareness on aflatoxin</title><p>The majority of respondents (90%) were unaware that mould growth in food could produce aflatoxins. Among the 10% who were aware, their knowledge primarily came from mass media and hospitals (Table 9). Only those who attended specialized training could identify diseases caused by aflatoxins, indicating that widespread unawareness may stem from insufficient education and training. Similarly, a study by Kimario <italic>et al</italic>. [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R26">26</xref>] in Chamwino Dodoma, Tanzania, reported very low awareness of mycotoxins among smallholder farmers, with over half (53.3%) unaware of fungi. The current findings by Kitigwa <italic>et al</italic>. [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R27">27</xref>] found a low level of aflatoxin awareness (23.2%) among smallholder dairy farmers in three Tanzanian districts (Hai, Mpwapwa, and Serengeti). Massomo [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R33">33</xref>] also noted a general lack of awareness among Tanzanian smallholder farmers regarding aflatoxins&#x26;#x02019; health and trade risks. This lack of awareness is corroborated by studies in other countries: 10% awareness in Rwanda [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R38">38</xref>], 21% in Uganda [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R37">37</xref>], and 25% in Tanzania [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R6">6</xref>]. In contrast, awareness in Kenya was relatively higher at 55% [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R54">54</xref>]. Among those who did recognize aflatoxin-related diseases, only 3.3% learned about them from colleagues, 3.3% from mass media, and another 3.3% from hospitals through doctors or nurses (Table 9). Also found that Tanzanian smallholder dairy farmers who had heard of aflatoxins mostly received information from radios/televisions (47.7%) and extension officers (16.9%) [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R27">27</xref>]. Ayo <italic>et al</italic>. [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R6">6</xref>] similarly reported that mass media, village officers, and extension officers are key information sources about aflatoxins for Tanzanian smallholder dairy farmers.</p>
<p>The limited exposure to mass media and healthcare sources underscores the need for more structured education and training programs. Previous research indicates that education is crucial in raising awareness and reducing aflatoxin contamination in foods [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R6">6</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R24">24</xref>]. </p>
<table-wrap id="tab9">
<label>Table 9</label>
<caption>
<p><b></b> Processor&#x02019;s awareness on aflatoxin</p>
</caption>

<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="center"><bold>Variable</bold></th>
<th align="center"><bold>Respondents/ categories</bold></th>
<th align="center"><bold>Frequency</bold></th>
<th align="center"><bold>Percent (%)</bold></th>
<th align="center"></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="center">Do you know mould cause toxin in food?</td>
<td align="center">Yes</td>
<td align="center">3</td>
<td align="center">10.0</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">No </td>
<td align="center">27</td>
<td align="center">90.0</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">If yes, which toxin?</td>
<td align="center">Aflatoxin </td>
<td align="center">3</td>
<td align="center">10.0</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">How did you know?</td>
<td align="center">Mass media</td>
<td align="center">1</td>
<td align="center">3.3</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">Hospital </td>
<td align="center">1</td>
<td align="center">3.3</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">Colleague</td>
<td align="center">1</td>
<td align="center">3.3</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Which condition can result to mould growth?</td>
<td align="center">Inadequate drying </td>
<td align="center">10</td>
<td align="center">33.3</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">Moisture up-take</td>
<td align="center">5</td>
<td align="center">16.7</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">Inadequate cleaned storage room</td>
<td align="center">2</td>
<td align="center">6.7</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">I don&#x02019;t know </td>
<td align="center">13</td>
<td align="center">43.3</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Do you know that aflatoxin can affect human  health?</td>
<td align="center">Yes </td>
<td align="center">3</td>
<td align="center">10.0</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">No </td>
<td align="center">27</td>
<td align="center">90.0</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Which health effect?</td>
<td align="center">Cancer</td>
<td align="center">1</td>
<td align="center">3.3</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">Vomiting </td>
<td align="center">1</td>
<td align="center">3.3</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">&#x00026;nbsp;</td>
<td align="center">Nausea</td>
<td align="center">1</td>
<td align="center">3.3</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" colspan="4">
<hr />
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap><p>Findings reveal that 90% of processors lacked awareness about aflatoxins and their health impacts (Table 9). A study in Kilosa, Tanzania, found that 66.7% of respondents were unaware of mycotoxin-related health hazards [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R32">32</xref>]. Similarly, different studies conducted by Matumba <italic>et al</italic>. [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R35">35</xref>] and Kimario <italic>et al</italic>. [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R26">26</xref>] reported significant gaps in knowledge about health effects from fungi contamination among smallholder farmers in Malawi and Tanzania (Chamwino Dodoma), respectively. Generally, the majorities of small-scale processors in developing countries, including Tanzania, are less aware of aflatoxin contamination and the associated health impacts that might arise after consuming aflatoxin-contaminated foods [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R51">51</xref>]. To address these knowledge gaps, structured education and training programs are essential for small-scale processors to enhance aflatoxin awareness and mitigate health risks.</p>
<p></p>
</sec><sec id="sec4">
<title>Conclusions</title><p>The pasta processing industry in the country is largely dominated by micro- and small-scale companies with limited knowledge and training in product handling. The lack of proper training and awareness of regulatory standards poses significant risks to hygiene and safety. Issues such as poor hygienic practices, inadequate storage, and the reuse of contaminated packaging materials can undermine the quality of processed folded vermicelli. To address these concerns, targeted interventions and training programs are essential for improving safety standards. Investing in better facilities, equipment, and personnel training on best practices is crucial for ensuring product quality. Food control authorities must closely monitor the industry to maintain high safety and quality standards. Ensuring robust training and stringent oversight is critical to guarantee the safety and quality of folded vermicelli products. </p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p><bold>Author Contributions:</bold> This study was carried out in collaboration among all authors. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.</p>
<p><bold>Funding:</bold> This research was funded by MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE (MoA), and the APC was funded by ME.</p>
<p><bold>Acknowledgments: </bold>The authors are highly grateful to the authority of the Ministry of Agriculture (MoA) for funding this research and Sokoine University of Agriculture (SUA) for their support in conducting this research. Authors also express sincere thanks to all people who assisted in the execution of this study, particularly the stuff members of the Department of Food Science and Agro-processing, SUA. </p>
<p><bold>Conflicts of Interest: </bold>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p>
</sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <title>References</title>
      
<ref id="R1">
<label>[1]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Acharya, A.S.; Prakash, A.; Saxena, P.; Nigam, A. Sampling: why and how of it? Indian Journal of Medical Specialities 2013, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.7713/ijms.2013.0032
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R2">
<label>[2]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Agarwal, S.; Singh, C.E.; Ekta, S.C.C. Extrusion processing: The effect on nutrients and based products. ~ 464 ~ The Pharma Innovation Journal, 2019, 8(4), 464-470. https://www.thepharmajournal.com
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R3">
<label>[3]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Ali, A.H., Kilima, B.M., and Wenaty, A. Assessment of Food Safety Knowledge, Hygienic Practices and Microbiological Quality of Halwa Produced in Urban West Region, Zanzibar. European Journal of Nutrition &#x00026; Food Safety 2023, 15(12), 117-129. https://doi.org/10.9734/EJNFS/2023/v15i121372
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R4">
<label>[4]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Annor, G.A.; Baiden, E.A. Evaluation of Food Hygiene Knowledge Attitudes and Practices of Food Handlers in Food Businesses in Accra, Ghana. Food and Nutrition Sciences 2011, 02(08), 830-836. https://doi.org/10.4236/fns.2011.28114
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R5">
<label>[5]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Atanda, S.A.; Pessu, P.O.; Agoda, S.; Isong, I.U.; Ikotun, I. The concepts and problems of post-harvest food losses in perishable crops. African Journal of Food Science 2011, 5(11), 603-613. http://www.academicjournals.org/AJFS
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R6">
<label>[6]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Ayo, E.M.; Matemu, A.; Laswai, G.H.; Kimanya, M.E. Socioeconomic Characteristics Influencing Level of Awareness of Aflatoxin Contamination of Feeds among Livestock Farmers in Meru District of Tanzania. Scientifica, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3485967
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R7">
<label>[7]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Azahar, H.; Ariff, A.; Hartini, Z. A visual analysis of packaging and labelling design of traditional snack foods in context of Malay SME in Malacca. December, 2004.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R8">
<label>[8]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Bashir, K. Physio-Chemical and Sensory Characteristics of Pasta Fortified With Chickpea Flour and Defatted Soy Flour. IOSR Journal of Environmental Science, Toxicology and Food Technology 2012, 1(5), 34-39. https://doi.org/10.9790/2402-0153439
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R9">
<label>[9]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Batt, C.A. Food Safety Assurance. In Reference Module in Food Science. Elsevier. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-100596-5.03442-9
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R10">
<label>[10]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Bresciani, A.; Pagani, M.A.; Marti, A. Pasta-Making Process: A Narrative Review on the Relation between Process Variables and Pasta Quality. Foods, 2022, 11(3), 256. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11030256
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R11">
<label>[11]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Chijoriga, Z. Quality and safety of peanut butter processed by small and medium enterprises in Dar Es Salaam Region, 2017, 123.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R12">
<label>[12]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Claval, P.; Jourdain-Annequin, C. The Dynamics of Mediterranean Food Cultures in Periods of Globalization. Athens Journal of Mediterranean Studies 2017, 4(3), 225-242. https://doi.org/10.30958/ajms.4-3-4
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R13">
<label>[13]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Djukic, D.; Moracanin, S.V.; Milijasevic, M.; Babic, J.; Memisi, N.; Mandic, L. Food safety and food sanitation. Journal of Hygienic Engineering and Design 2016, 14, 25-31.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R14">
<label>[14]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Dudeja, P.; Singh, A. Food safety from farm-to-fork-food-safety issues related to processing. In Food Safety in the 21st Century: Public Health Perspective. Elsevier Inc. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-801773-9.00015-7
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R15">
<label>[15]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Ebert, M. Hygiene Principles to Avoid Contamination/Cross-Contamination in the Kitchen and During Food Processing. In Staphylococcus Aureus. Elsevier Inc. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809671-0.00011-5
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R16">
<label>[16]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">FAO., and WHO. General Principles of Food Hygiene. Codex Alimentarius Code of Practice, No.CXC 1-1969. Codex Alimentarius Commission. 2023, 4-35.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R17">
<label>[17]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Fritz, M.; Schiefer, G. Tracking, tracing, and business process interests in food commodities: A multi-level decision complexity. International Journal of Production Economics, 2009, 117(2), 317-329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.10.015
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R18">
<label>[18]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Georgiadis, P.; Vlachos, D.; Iakovou, E. A system dynamics modeling framework for the strategic supply chain management of food chains. Journal of Food Engineering 2005, 70(3), 351-364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2004.06.030
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R19">
<label>[19]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Giannetti, V.; Boccacci, M.M.; Marini, F.; Biancolillo, A. Effects of thermal treatments on durum wheat pasta flavour during production process: A modelling approach to provide added-value to pasta dried at low temperatures. Talanta, 2021, 225 (December 2020), 121955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2020.121955
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R20">
<label>[20]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Hassan, J.K.; Fweja, L.W.T. Food hygienic practices and safety measures among street food vendors in Zanzibar Urban District. EFood, 2020, 1(4), 332-338.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R21">
<label>[21]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Holah, J.T. Cleaning and disinfection practices in food processing. In Hygiene in Food Processing: Principles and Practice: Second Edition (Vol. 259). Woodhead Publishing Limited, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857098634.3.259
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R22">
<label>[22]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Hossain, M.S.; Santhanam, A.; Nik, N.N.A.; Omar, A.K.M. Clinical solid waste management practices and its impact on human health and environment - A review. Waste Management, 2011, 31(4), 754-766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2010.11.008
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R23">
<label>[23]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Ilhan, I.; Turan, D.; Gibson, I.; ten Klooster, R. Understanding the factors affecting the seal integrity in heat sealed flexible food packages: A review. Packaging Technology and Science, 2021, 34(6), 321-337. https://doi.org/10.1002/pts.2564
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R24">
<label>[24]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Jolly, C.M.; Bayard, B.; Awuah, R.T.; Fialor, S.C.; Williams, J.T. Examining the structure of awareness and perceptions of groundnut aflatoxin among Ghanaian health and agricultural professionals and its influence on their actions. Journal of Socio-Economics 2009, 38(2), 280-287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2008.05.013
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R25">
<label>[25]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Kamboj, S.; Gupta, N.; Bandral, J.D.; Gandotra, G.; Anjum, N. Food safety and hygiene: A review. International Journal of Chemical Studies 2020, 8(2), 358-368. https://doi.org/10.22271/chemi.2020.v8.i2f.8794
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R26">
<label>[26]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Kimario, M.E.; Moshi, A.P.; Ndossi, H.P.; Kiwango, P.A.; Shirima, G.G.; Kussaga, J.B. Smallholder farmers ' storage practices and awareness on aflatoxin contamination of cereals and oilseeds in. 2022, 13(June), 13-23. https://doi.org/10.5897/JCO2020.0220
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R27">
<label>[27]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Kitigwa, S.J.; Kimaro, E.G.; Nagagi, Y.P.; Kussaga, J.B.; Suleiman, R.A.; Matemu, A. Occurrence and associated risk factors of aflatoxin contamination in animal feeds and raw milk from three agroecological zones of Tanzania. 2023, 16(2), 149-163. https://doi.org/10.3920/WMJ2022.2801
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R28">
<label>[28]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Kothari, C.R.; Garg, G. Research Methodology: Methods and Techniques. New Age International (P) Limited, Publishers. 2004. 4835/24, Ansari Road, Daryaganj, New Delhi-110002. https://www.newagepublishers.com
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R29">
<label>[29]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Kussaga, B.; Luning, P.A.; Tiisekwa, B.P.M. Challenges in Performance of Food Safety Management Systems&#x0202f;: A Case of Fish Processing Companies in Tanzania. 2014, 77(4), 621-630. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-13-254
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R30">
<label>[30]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Kussaga, J.B.; Luning, P.A. Current performance of food safety management systems of dairy processing companies in Tanzania. 2015, 68(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0307.12183
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R31">
<label>[31]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Loewe, M.; Al-Ayouty, I.; Altpeter, A.; Borbein, L.; Chantelauze, M.; Kern, M.; Niendorf, E.; Reda, M. Which Factors Determine the Upgrading of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs)? The Case of Egypt. In SSRN Electronic Journal, 2013. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2283056
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R32">
<label>[32]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Magembe, K.S.; Mwatawala, M.W.; Mamiro, D.P.; Chingonikaya, E.E. Assessment of awareness of mycotoxins infections in stored maize (Zea mays L.) and groundnut (Arachis hypogea l.) in Kilosa district, Tanzania. International Journal of Food Contamination, 2016, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40550-016-0035-5
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R33">
<label>[33]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Massomo, S.M.S. Aspergillus flavus and aflatoxin contamination in the maize value chain and what needs to be done in Tanzania. Scientific African 2020, 10, e00606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2020.e00606
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R34">
<label>[34]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Masunzu, N. Safety and quality of commercial cereal-based complementary foods produced and marketed in Mwanza region, 2017.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R35">
<label>[35]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Matumba, L.; Van Poucke, C.; Njumbe, E.E.; Jacobs, B.; De Saeger, S. Effectiveness of hand sorting, flotation/washing, dehulling and combinations thereof on the decontamination of mycotoxin-contaminated white maize. Food Additives and Contaminants - Part A Chemistry, Analysis, Control, Exposure and Risk Assessment, 2015, 32(6), 960-969. https://doi.org/10.1080/19440049.2015.1029535
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R36">
<label>[36]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Messer, K.D.; Costanigro, M.; Kaiser, H.M. Labeling food processes: The good, the bad and the ugly. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 2017, 39(3), 407-427. https://doi.org/10.1093/aepp/ppx028
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R37">
<label>[37]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Nakavuma, J.L.; Kirabo, A.; Bogere, P.; Nabulime, M.M.; Kaaya, A.N.; Gnonlonfin, B. Awareness of mycotoxins and occurrence of aflatoxins in poultry feeds and feed ingredients in selected regions of Uganda. International Journal of Food Contamination 2020, 7(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40550-020-00079-2
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R38">
<label>[38]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Nishimwe, K.; Bowers, E.; Ayabagabo, J.D.; Habimana, R.; Mutiga, S.; Maier, D. Assessment of aflatoxin and fumonisin contamination and associated risk factors in feed and feed ingredients in Rwanda. Toxins 2019, 11(5), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins11050270
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R39">
<label>[39]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Okpala, C.O.R.; Korzeniowska, M. Understanding the Relevance of Quality Management in Agro-food Product Industry: From Ethical Considerations to Assuring Food Hygiene Quality Safety Standards and Its Associated Processes. Food Reviews International, 2023, 39(4), 1879-1952. https://doi.org/10.1080/87559129.2021.1938600
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R40">
<label>[40]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Osei, T.B.; Anfu, P.O. Evaluation of the food safety and quality management systems of the cottage food manufacturing industry in Ghana. Food Control 2019, 101 (February), 24-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2019.02.028
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R41">
<label>[41]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Pleadin, J.; Staver, M.M.; Markov, K.; Frece, J.; Zadravec, M.; Jaki, V.; Krupi&#x00107;, I.; Vah&#x0010d;i&#x00107;, N. Mycotoxins in Organic and Conventional Cereals and Cereal Products Grown and Marketed in Croatia. Mycotoxin Res.33 2017, (3), 219-227. DOI: 10.1007/s12550-017-0280-3.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R42">
<label>[42]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Quinn, M.M.; Henneberger, P.K.; Braun, B.; Delclos, G.L.; Fagan, K.; Huang, V.; Knaack, J.L.S.; Kusek, L.; Lee, S.J.; Le, M.N.; Maher, K.A.E.; McCrone, S.H.; Mitchell, A.H.; Pechter, E.; Rosenman, K.; Sehulster, L.; Stephens, A.C.; Wilburn, S.; Zock, J.P. Cleaning and disinfecting environmental surfaces in health care: Toward an integrated framework for infection and occupational illness prevention. American Journal of Infection Control 2015, 43(5), 424-434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2015.01.029
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R43">
<label>[43]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Rabia, A.R.; Kimera, S.I.; Wambura, P.N.; Mdegela, R.H.; Misinzo, G.; Mbazi, E.; Ngaya, R.; Mzula, A. Knowledge, attitude and practices on handling, processing and consumption of marine foods in Zanzibar, Tanzania. 2017.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R44">
<label>[44]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Ruteri, J.M. Supply Chain Management and Challenges Facing the Food Industry Sector in Tanzania. International Journal of Business and Management 2009, 4(12). https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v4n12p70
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R45">
<label>[45]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Sacco, C.; Donato, R.; Zanella, B.; Pini, G.; Pettini, L.; Marino, M.F.; Rookmin, A.D.; Marvasi, M. Mycotoxins and Flours: Effect of Type of Crop, Organic Production, Packaging Type on the Recovery of Fungal Genus and Mycotoxins. Int. J. Food Microbiology 2020, .334, 108808. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2020.108808.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R46">
<label>[46]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Sasongko, S.B.; Rini, B.P.; Maehiroh, H.; Utari, F.D.; Djaeni, M. The Effect of Temperature on Vermicelli Drying under Dehumidified Air. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 2021, 1053(1), 012102. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/1053/1/012102
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R47">
<label>[47]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Schabo, D.C.; Martins, L.M.; Maciel, J.F.; Iamanaka, B.T.; Taniwaki, M.H.; Schaffner, D.W.; Magnani, M. Production of Aflatoxin B1 and B2 by Aspergillus flavus in Inoculated Wheat Using Typical Craft Beer Malting Conditions. Food Microbiology 2020, .89, 103456. DOI: 10.1016/j.fm.2020.103456.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R48">
<label>[48]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Sousa, C.P.D. BRAZILIAN ARCHIVES OF BIOLOGY AND TECHNOLOGY The Impact of Food Manufacturing Practices on Food borne Diseases. Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol. V, 2008, 51, 815-823.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R49">
<label>[49]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Todd, E.C.D.; Michaels, B.S.; Greig, J.D.; Smith, D.; Bartleson, C.A. Outbreaks where food workers have been implicated in the spread of foodborne disease. Part 8. Gloves as barriers to prevent contamination of food by workers. Journal of Food Protection 2010, 73(9), 1762-1773. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-73.9.1762
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R50">
<label>[50]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Tolmacheva, T.; Toshev, A.; Androsova, N. Methods for ensuring the quality and safety of raw materials used in food for athletes. 17(Icistis), 2019, 270-274. https://doi.org/10.2991/icistis-19.2019.69
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R51">
<label>[51]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Unnevehr, L.; Grace, D. The role of risk assessment in guiding aflatoxin policy. Aflatoxins: Finding Solutions for Improved Food Safety, 2013, 14. https://www.ifpri.org
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R52">
<label>[52]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Varzakas, T. Quality and safety aspects of cereals (Wheat) and their products. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 2016, 56(15), 2495-2510. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2013.866070
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R53">
<label>[53]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Vasconcellos, J.A. Quality assurance for the food industry: A practical approach. Quality Assurance for the Food Industry: A Practical Approach, 2003, 1-422.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R54">
<label>[54]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Walke, M.; Mtimet, N.; Baker, D.; Lindahl, J.; Hartmann, M.; Grace, D. Kenyan perceptions of aflatoxin: An analysis of raw milk consumption. Paper Prepared for Presentation at the EAAE 2014 Congress 'Agri-Food and Rural Innovations for Healthier Societies,' August 26 to 29, 2014, Ljubljana, Slovenia. http://purl.umn.edu/182729%5Cnhttp://ebrary.ifpri.org/cdm/ref/collection/p15738coll9/id/42
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R55">
<label>[55]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Zambrano, M.V.; Dutta, B.; Mercer, D.G.; MacLean, H.L.; Touchie, M.F. Assessment of moisture content measurement methods of dried food products in small-scale operations in developing countries: A review. Trends in Food Science and Technology 2019, 88, 484-496.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R56">
<label>[56]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Zhao, Y.; Wang, Q.; Huang, J.; Ma, L.; Chen, Z.; Wang, F. Aflatoxin B1 and Sterigmatocystin in Wheat and Wheat Products from Supermarkets in China. Food Addit. Contam. B. 2018, 11(1), 9-14. DOI: 10.1080/ 19393210.2017.1388295
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R1">
<label>[1]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Acharya, A.S.; Prakash, A.; Saxena, P.; Nigam, A. Sampling: why and how of it? Indian Journal of Medical Specialities 2013, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.7713/ijms.2013.0032
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R2">
<label>[2]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Agarwal, S.; Singh, C.E.; Ekta, S.C.C. Extrusion processing: The effect on nutrients and based products. ~ 464 ~ The Pharma Innovation Journal, 2019, 8(4), 464-470. https://www.thepharmajournal.com
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R3">
<label>[3]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Ali, A.H., Kilima, B.M., and Wenaty, A. Assessment of Food Safety Knowledge, Hygienic Practices and Microbiological Quality of Halwa Produced in Urban West Region, Zanzibar. European Journal of Nutrition &#x00026; Food Safety 2023, 15(12), 117-129. https://doi.org/10.9734/EJNFS/2023/v15i121372
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R4">
<label>[4]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Annor, G.A.; Baiden, E.A. Evaluation of Food Hygiene Knowledge Attitudes and Practices of Food Handlers in Food Businesses in Accra, Ghana. Food and Nutrition Sciences 2011, 02(08), 830-836. https://doi.org/10.4236/fns.2011.28114
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R5">
<label>[5]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Atanda, S.A.; Pessu, P.O.; Agoda, S.; Isong, I.U.; Ikotun, I. The concepts and problems of post-harvest food losses in perishable crops. African Journal of Food Science 2011, 5(11), 603-613. http://www.academicjournals.org/AJFS
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R6">
<label>[6]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Ayo, E.M.; Matemu, A.; Laswai, G.H.; Kimanya, M.E. Socioeconomic Characteristics Influencing Level of Awareness of Aflatoxin Contamination of Feeds among Livestock Farmers in Meru District of Tanzania. Scientifica, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3485967
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R7">
<label>[7]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Azahar, H.; Ariff, A.; Hartini, Z. A visual analysis of packaging and labelling design of traditional snack foods in context of Malay SME in Malacca. December, 2004.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R8">
<label>[8]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Bashir, K. Physio-Chemical and Sensory Characteristics of Pasta Fortified With Chickpea Flour and Defatted Soy Flour. IOSR Journal of Environmental Science, Toxicology and Food Technology 2012, 1(5), 34-39. https://doi.org/10.9790/2402-0153439
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R9">
<label>[9]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Batt, C.A. Food Safety Assurance. In Reference Module in Food Science. Elsevier. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-100596-5.03442-9
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R10">
<label>[10]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Bresciani, A.; Pagani, M.A.; Marti, A. Pasta-Making Process: A Narrative Review on the Relation between Process Variables and Pasta Quality. Foods, 2022, 11(3), 256. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11030256
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R11">
<label>[11]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Chijoriga, Z. Quality and safety of peanut butter processed by small and medium enterprises in Dar Es Salaam Region, 2017, 123.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R12">
<label>[12]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Claval, P.; Jourdain-Annequin, C. The Dynamics of Mediterranean Food Cultures in Periods of Globalization. Athens Journal of Mediterranean Studies 2017, 4(3), 225-242. https://doi.org/10.30958/ajms.4-3-4
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R13">
<label>[13]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Djukic, D.; Moracanin, S.V.; Milijasevic, M.; Babic, J.; Memisi, N.; Mandic, L. Food safety and food sanitation. Journal of Hygienic Engineering and Design 2016, 14, 25-31.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R14">
<label>[14]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Dudeja, P.; Singh, A. Food safety from farm-to-fork-food-safety issues related to processing. In Food Safety in the 21st Century: Public Health Perspective. Elsevier Inc. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-801773-9.00015-7
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R15">
<label>[15]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Ebert, M. Hygiene Principles to Avoid Contamination/Cross-Contamination in the Kitchen and During Food Processing. In Staphylococcus Aureus. Elsevier Inc. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809671-0.00011-5
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R16">
<label>[16]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">FAO., and WHO. General Principles of Food Hygiene. Codex Alimentarius Code of Practice, No.CXC 1-1969. Codex Alimentarius Commission. 2023, 4-35.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R17">
<label>[17]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Fritz, M.; Schiefer, G. Tracking, tracing, and business process interests in food commodities: A multi-level decision complexity. International Journal of Production Economics, 2009, 117(2), 317-329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.10.015
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R18">
<label>[18]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Georgiadis, P.; Vlachos, D.; Iakovou, E. A system dynamics modeling framework for the strategic supply chain management of food chains. Journal of Food Engineering 2005, 70(3), 351-364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2004.06.030
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R19">
<label>[19]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Giannetti, V.; Boccacci, M.M.; Marini, F.; Biancolillo, A. Effects of thermal treatments on durum wheat pasta flavour during production process: A modelling approach to provide added-value to pasta dried at low temperatures. Talanta, 2021, 225 (December 2020), 121955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2020.121955
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R20">
<label>[20]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Hassan, J.K.; Fweja, L.W.T. Food hygienic practices and safety measures among street food vendors in Zanzibar Urban District. EFood, 2020, 1(4), 332-338.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R21">
<label>[21]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Holah, J.T. Cleaning and disinfection practices in food processing. In Hygiene in Food Processing: Principles and Practice: Second Edition (Vol. 259). Woodhead Publishing Limited, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857098634.3.259
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R22">
<label>[22]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Hossain, M.S.; Santhanam, A.; Nik, N.N.A.; Omar, A.K.M. Clinical solid waste management practices and its impact on human health and environment - A review. Waste Management, 2011, 31(4), 754-766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2010.11.008
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R23">
<label>[23]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Ilhan, I.; Turan, D.; Gibson, I.; ten Klooster, R. Understanding the factors affecting the seal integrity in heat sealed flexible food packages: A review. Packaging Technology and Science, 2021, 34(6), 321-337. https://doi.org/10.1002/pts.2564
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R24">
<label>[24]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Jolly, C.M.; Bayard, B.; Awuah, R.T.; Fialor, S.C.; Williams, J.T. Examining the structure of awareness and perceptions of groundnut aflatoxin among Ghanaian health and agricultural professionals and its influence on their actions. Journal of Socio-Economics 2009, 38(2), 280-287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2008.05.013
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R25">
<label>[25]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Kamboj, S.; Gupta, N.; Bandral, J.D.; Gandotra, G.; Anjum, N. Food safety and hygiene: A review. International Journal of Chemical Studies 2020, 8(2), 358-368. https://doi.org/10.22271/chemi.2020.v8.i2f.8794
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R26">
<label>[26]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Kimario, M.E.; Moshi, A.P.; Ndossi, H.P.; Kiwango, P.A.; Shirima, G.G.; Kussaga, J.B. Smallholder farmers ' storage practices and awareness on aflatoxin contamination of cereals and oilseeds in. 2022, 13(June), 13-23. https://doi.org/10.5897/JCO2020.0220
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R27">
<label>[27]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Kitigwa, S.J.; Kimaro, E.G.; Nagagi, Y.P.; Kussaga, J.B.; Suleiman, R.A.; Matemu, A. Occurrence and associated risk factors of aflatoxin contamination in animal feeds and raw milk from three agroecological zones of Tanzania. 2023, 16(2), 149-163. https://doi.org/10.3920/WMJ2022.2801
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R28">
<label>[28]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Kothari, C.R.; Garg, G. Research Methodology: Methods and Techniques. New Age International (P) Limited, Publishers. 2004. 4835/24, Ansari Road, Daryaganj, New Delhi-110002. https://www.newagepublishers.com
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R29">
<label>[29]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Kussaga, B.; Luning, P.A.; Tiisekwa, B.P.M. Challenges in Performance of Food Safety Management Systems&#x0202f;: A Case of Fish Processing Companies in Tanzania. 2014, 77(4), 621-630. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-13-254
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R30">
<label>[30]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Kussaga, J.B.; Luning, P.A. Current performance of food safety management systems of dairy processing companies in Tanzania. 2015, 68(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0307.12183
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R31">
<label>[31]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Loewe, M.; Al-Ayouty, I.; Altpeter, A.; Borbein, L.; Chantelauze, M.; Kern, M.; Niendorf, E.; Reda, M. Which Factors Determine the Upgrading of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs)? The Case of Egypt. In SSRN Electronic Journal, 2013. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2283056
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R32">
<label>[32]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Magembe, K.S.; Mwatawala, M.W.; Mamiro, D.P.; Chingonikaya, E.E. Assessment of awareness of mycotoxins infections in stored maize (Zea mays L.) and groundnut (Arachis hypogea l.) in Kilosa district, Tanzania. International Journal of Food Contamination, 2016, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40550-016-0035-5
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R33">
<label>[33]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Massomo, S.M.S. Aspergillus flavus and aflatoxin contamination in the maize value chain and what needs to be done in Tanzania. Scientific African 2020, 10, e00606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2020.e00606
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R34">
<label>[34]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Masunzu, N. Safety and quality of commercial cereal-based complementary foods produced and marketed in Mwanza region, 2017.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R35">
<label>[35]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Matumba, L.; Van Poucke, C.; Njumbe, E.E.; Jacobs, B.; De Saeger, S. Effectiveness of hand sorting, flotation/washing, dehulling and combinations thereof on the decontamination of mycotoxin-contaminated white maize. Food Additives and Contaminants - Part A Chemistry, Analysis, Control, Exposure and Risk Assessment, 2015, 32(6), 960-969. https://doi.org/10.1080/19440049.2015.1029535
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R36">
<label>[36]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Messer, K.D.; Costanigro, M.; Kaiser, H.M. Labeling food processes: The good, the bad and the ugly. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 2017, 39(3), 407-427. https://doi.org/10.1093/aepp/ppx028
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R37">
<label>[37]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Nakavuma, J.L.; Kirabo, A.; Bogere, P.; Nabulime, M.M.; Kaaya, A.N.; Gnonlonfin, B. Awareness of mycotoxins and occurrence of aflatoxins in poultry feeds and feed ingredients in selected regions of Uganda. International Journal of Food Contamination 2020, 7(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40550-020-00079-2
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R38">
<label>[38]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Nishimwe, K.; Bowers, E.; Ayabagabo, J.D.; Habimana, R.; Mutiga, S.; Maier, D. Assessment of aflatoxin and fumonisin contamination and associated risk factors in feed and feed ingredients in Rwanda. Toxins 2019, 11(5), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins11050270
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R39">
<label>[39]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Okpala, C.O.R.; Korzeniowska, M. Understanding the Relevance of Quality Management in Agro-food Product Industry: From Ethical Considerations to Assuring Food Hygiene Quality Safety Standards and Its Associated Processes. Food Reviews International, 2023, 39(4), 1879-1952. https://doi.org/10.1080/87559129.2021.1938600
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R40">
<label>[40]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Osei, T.B.; Anfu, P.O. Evaluation of the food safety and quality management systems of the cottage food manufacturing industry in Ghana. Food Control 2019, 101 (February), 24-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2019.02.028
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R41">
<label>[41]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Pleadin, J.; Staver, M.M.; Markov, K.; Frece, J.; Zadravec, M.; Jaki, V.; Krupi&#x00107;, I.; Vah&#x0010d;i&#x00107;, N. Mycotoxins in Organic and Conventional Cereals and Cereal Products Grown and Marketed in Croatia. Mycotoxin Res.33 2017, (3), 219-227. DOI: 10.1007/s12550-017-0280-3.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R42">
<label>[42]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Quinn, M.M.; Henneberger, P.K.; Braun, B.; Delclos, G.L.; Fagan, K.; Huang, V.; Knaack, J.L.S.; Kusek, L.; Lee, S.J.; Le, M.N.; Maher, K.A.E.; McCrone, S.H.; Mitchell, A.H.; Pechter, E.; Rosenman, K.; Sehulster, L.; Stephens, A.C.; Wilburn, S.; Zock, J.P. Cleaning and disinfecting environmental surfaces in health care: Toward an integrated framework for infection and occupational illness prevention. American Journal of Infection Control 2015, 43(5), 424-434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2015.01.029
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R43">
<label>[43]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Rabia, A.R.; Kimera, S.I.; Wambura, P.N.; Mdegela, R.H.; Misinzo, G.; Mbazi, E.; Ngaya, R.; Mzula, A. Knowledge, attitude and practices on handling, processing and consumption of marine foods in Zanzibar, Tanzania. 2017.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R44">
<label>[44]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Ruteri, J.M. Supply Chain Management and Challenges Facing the Food Industry Sector in Tanzania. International Journal of Business and Management 2009, 4(12). https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v4n12p70
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R45">
<label>[45]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Sacco, C.; Donato, R.; Zanella, B.; Pini, G.; Pettini, L.; Marino, M.F.; Rookmin, A.D.; Marvasi, M. Mycotoxins and Flours: Effect of Type of Crop, Organic Production, Packaging Type on the Recovery of Fungal Genus and Mycotoxins. Int. J. Food Microbiology 2020, .334, 108808. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2020.108808.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R46">
<label>[46]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Sasongko, S.B.; Rini, B.P.; Maehiroh, H.; Utari, F.D.; Djaeni, M. The Effect of Temperature on Vermicelli Drying under Dehumidified Air. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 2021, 1053(1), 012102. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/1053/1/012102
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R47">
<label>[47]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Schabo, D.C.; Martins, L.M.; Maciel, J.F.; Iamanaka, B.T.; Taniwaki, M.H.; Schaffner, D.W.; Magnani, M. Production of Aflatoxin B1 and B2 by Aspergillus flavus in Inoculated Wheat Using Typical Craft Beer Malting Conditions. Food Microbiology 2020, .89, 103456. DOI: 10.1016/j.fm.2020.103456.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R48">
<label>[48]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Sousa, C.P.D. BRAZILIAN ARCHIVES OF BIOLOGY AND TECHNOLOGY The Impact of Food Manufacturing Practices on Food borne Diseases. Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol. V, 2008, 51, 815-823.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R49">
<label>[49]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Todd, E.C.D.; Michaels, B.S.; Greig, J.D.; Smith, D.; Bartleson, C.A. Outbreaks where food workers have been implicated in the spread of foodborne disease. Part 8. Gloves as barriers to prevent contamination of food by workers. Journal of Food Protection 2010, 73(9), 1762-1773. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-73.9.1762
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R50">
<label>[50]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Tolmacheva, T.; Toshev, A.; Androsova, N. Methods for ensuring the quality and safety of raw materials used in food for athletes. 17(Icistis), 2019, 270-274. https://doi.org/10.2991/icistis-19.2019.69
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R51">
<label>[51]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Unnevehr, L.; Grace, D. The role of risk assessment in guiding aflatoxin policy. Aflatoxins: Finding Solutions for Improved Food Safety, 2013, 14. https://www.ifpri.org
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R52">
<label>[52]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Varzakas, T. Quality and safety aspects of cereals (Wheat) and their products. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 2016, 56(15), 2495-2510. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2013.866070
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R53">
<label>[53]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Vasconcellos, J.A. Quality assurance for the food industry: A practical approach. Quality Assurance for the Food Industry: A Practical Approach, 2003, 1-422.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R54">
<label>[54]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Walke, M.; Mtimet, N.; Baker, D.; Lindahl, J.; Hartmann, M.; Grace, D. Kenyan perceptions of aflatoxin: An analysis of raw milk consumption. Paper Prepared for Presentation at the EAAE 2014 Congress 'Agri-Food and Rural Innovations for Healthier Societies,' August 26 to 29, 2014, Ljubljana, Slovenia. http://purl.umn.edu/182729%5Cnhttp://ebrary.ifpri.org/cdm/ref/collection/p15738coll9/id/42
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R55">
<label>[55]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Zambrano, M.V.; Dutta, B.; Mercer, D.G.; MacLean, H.L.; Touchie, M.F. Assessment of moisture content measurement methods of dried food products in small-scale operations in developing countries: A review. Trends in Food Science and Technology 2019, 88, 484-496.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R56">
<label>[56]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Zhao, Y.; Wang, Q.; Huang, J.; Ma, L.; Chen, Z.; Wang, F. Aflatoxin B1 and Sterigmatocystin in Wheat and Wheat Products from Supermarkets in China. Food Addit. Contam. B. 2018, 11(1), 9-14. DOI: 10.1080/ 19393210.2017.1388295
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>