﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD with MathML3 v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article
    xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"
    xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJMR</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Online Journal of Microbiological Research</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub"></issn>
      <issn pub-type="ppub"></issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Science Publications</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.31586/ojmr.2022.360</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJMR-360</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
          <subject>Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>
          DFT-Based Prediction of Anti-Leishmanial Activity of Carboxylates and Their Antimony(III) Complexes Against Five Leishmanial Strains
        </article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sahu</surname>
<given-names>Vishnu Kumar</given-names>
</name>
<xref rid="af1" ref-type="aff">1</xref>
<xref rid="cr1" ref-type="corresp">*</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chandra</surname>
<given-names>Neetu</given-names>
</name>
<xref rid="af2" ref-type="aff">2</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname>
<given-names>Pratibha</given-names>
</name>
<xref rid="af3" ref-type="aff">3</xref>
</contrib>
      </contrib-group>
<aff id="af1"><label>1</label> Department of Chemistry, Maharani Lal Kunwari Post Graduate College, Balrampur-271201 (U.P.), India</aff>
<aff id="af2"><label>2</label> Department of Botany, Maharani Lal Kunwari Post Graduate College, Balrampur-271201 (U.P.), India</aff>
<aff id="af3"><label>3</label> Department of Chemistry, Kamta Prasad Sunderlal Saket Post Graduate College, Ayodhya-224123 (U.P.), India</aff>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="c1">
<label>*</label>Corresponding author at: Department of Chemistry, Maharani Lal Kunwari Post Graduate College, Balrampur-271201 (U.P.), India
</corresp>
</author-notes>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <day>22</day>
        <month>07</month>
        <year>2022</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>1</volume>
      <issue>1</issue>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received">
          <day>22</day>
          <month>07</month>
          <year>2022</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="rev-recd">
          <day>22</day>
          <month>07</month>
          <year>2022</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="accepted">
          <day>22</day>
          <month>07</month>
          <year>2022</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="pub">
          <day>22</day>
          <month>07</month>
          <year>2022</year>
        </date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>&#xa9; Copyright 2022 by authors and Trend Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2022</copyright-year>
        <license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
          <license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <abstract>
        Carboxylates and their antimony(III) complexes experimentally scanned earlier for anti-leishmanial activity (IC<sub>50</sub>) against five leishmanial strains viz., <italic>L. major, L. major (Pak),</italic><italic> </italic><italic>L. tropica, L. mex mex, </italic>and<italic> L. donovani</italic>. These activities have been theoretically predicted by DFT method along with quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) study. Molecular modeling and geometry optimization of the all the eight compounds have been performed on workspace program of CAChe Pro software of Fujitsu by opting B88-PW91 (Becke '88; Perdew &#x00026;#x26; Wang '91) GGA (generalized-gradient approximation) energy functional with DZVP (double-zeta valence polarized&#x000a0;) basis set in DFT (Density Functional Theory). For QSAR, multiple linear regression (MLR) analysis has been performed on Project Leader Program associated with CAChe. The reliability of correlation between experimental activities and predicted activities are r<sup>2 </sup>= 0.826, r<sup>2</sup><sub>CV </sub>= 0.426 (<italic>L. major</italic>); r<sup>2 </sup>= 0.905, r<sup>2</sup><sub>CV </sub>= 0.507 (<italic>L. major (Pak)</italic>); r<sup>2 </sup>= 0.980, r<sup>2</sup><sub>CV </sub>= 0.932 (<italic>L. tropica</italic>); r<sup>2 </sup>= 0.781, r<sup>2</sup><sub>CV </sub>= 0.580 (<italic>L. mex mex</italic>) and r<sup>2 </sup>= 0.634, r<sup>2</sup><sub>CV </sub>= 0.376 (<italic>L. donovani</italic>), and a comparison of the experimental values and the values obtained by theoretical calculations has been presented pictorially that shows close resemblance.
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd-group><kwd>Carboxylates and their antimony(III) complexes; anti-leishmanial activity; DFT</kwd>
<kwd>MLR</kwd>
</kwd-group>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec1">
<title>Introduction</title><p>Survey of literatures exposed that organoantimony compounds show diversity in their biological activity [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R1">1</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R2">2</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R3">3</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R4">4</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R5">5</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R6">6</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R7">7</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R8">8</xref>]. They show their antitumor, antimicrobial (viz., anti-fungal and anti-leishmanial) and insecticidal (viz., contact, stomach, anti-feedant and acaricidal) activities mostly in +III and +V oxidation states [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R1">1</xref>]. We know that experimental determination of various activity viz., pharmacological, toxicological, biochemical as well as human health end points of any compound are time and wealth-consuming. Hence, mathematical models were, are and will be of important use to predict these activities [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R9">9</xref>]. Gap between experimental and theoretical measurement is now bridged by computer simulation techniques [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R10">10</xref>]. In our previous work anti-fungal and insecticidal activities of perfluorophenyl antimony(III) and antimony(V) chlorides were rescaled by us using mathematical model after experimental work and the results were exciting [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R1">1</xref>]. This boost us to draw mathematical models for rescaling anti-leishmanial activities of carboxylates and their antimony(III) complexes.<italic> </italic>The quantum chemical parameters used in this study were well described in our previous publications [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R11">11</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R12">12</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R13">13</xref>].</p>
<p></p>
</sec><sec id="sec2">
<title>Materials and Methods</title><p>Carboxylates and their antimony(III) complexes listed inTable <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab1">1</xref> are the study materials for the present study [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R14">14</xref>]. The IC<sub>50</sub> of these compounds were taken from the literature against five leishmanial strains viz., <italic>L. major, L. major (Pak), L. tropica, L. mex mex, </italic>and<italic> L. donovani </italic>(Table 2,Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab3">3</xref>,Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab4">4</xref>,Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab5">5</xref>). For prediction of biological activity (IC<sub>50</sub>) of these compounds, multiple linear regression analysis has been performed on Project Leader Program associated with CAChe [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R15">15</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R16">16</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R17">17</xref>]. The quantum chemical properties listed inTable <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab1">1</xref> were used as independent variables and the experimental IC<sub>50</sub> of the compounds listed inTable <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab2">2</xref>,Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab3">3</xref>,Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab4">4</xref>,Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab5">5</xref>,Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab6">6</xref> as dependent variables. For this the molecular modeling and geometry optimization of the all the eight compounds have been performed on workspace program of CAChe Pro software of Fujitsu by opting B88-PW91GGA energy functional with DZVP basis set in DFT method [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R18">18</xref>].</p>
<table-wrap id="tab1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption>
<p><b> Quantum chemical properties and optimized structure of compounds</b></p>
</caption>
<table> <tr>  <td rowspan="10"><p> </p>  </td>  <td>  <p> </p>  </td>  <td>  <p> </p>  </td>  <td rowspan="10">  <p> </p>  </td>  <td>  <p> </p>  </td>  <td>  <p> </p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p>EA =</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>2.716</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>EA =</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>2.344</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p>IP =</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>5.952</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>IP =</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>5.796</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p>η =</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>1.618</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>η =</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>1.726</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p>S =</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.309</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>S =</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.29</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p>µ =</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>1.828</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>µ =</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>2.244</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p>E<sub>T</sub> =</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-817.479</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>E<sub>T</sub> =</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-856.797</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p>ω =</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>1.033</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>ω =</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>1.459</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p>χ =</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>4.334</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>χ =</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>4.07</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p> </p>  </td>  <td>  <p> </p>  </td>  <td>  <p> </p>  </td>  <td>  <p> </p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p>Compound-1</p>  </td>  <td>  <p> </p>  </td>  <td>  <p> </p>  </td>  <td>  <p>Compound-2</p>  </td>  <td>  <p> </p>  </td>  <td>  <p> </p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p> </p>  </td>  <td>  <p> </p>  </td>  <td>  <p> </p>  </td>  <td>  <p> </p>  </td>  <td>  <p> </p>  </td>  <td>  <p> </p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td rowspan="10">  <p> </p>  </td>  <td>  <p> </p>  </td>  <td>  <p> </p>  </td>  <td rowspan="10">  <p> </p>  </td>  <td>  <p> </p>  </td>  <td>  <p> </p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p>EA =</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>2.18</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>EA =</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>2.833</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p>IP =</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>5.911</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>IP =</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>5.885</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p>η =</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>1.865</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>η =</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>1.526</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p>S =</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.268</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>S =</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.328</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p>µ =</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>3.022</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>µ =</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>2.154</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p>E<sub>T</sub> =</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-1087.84</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>E<sub>T</sub> =</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-1009.23</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p>ω =</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>2.448</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>ω =</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>1.52</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p>χ =</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>4.045</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>χ =</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>4.359</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p> </p>  </td>  <td>  <p> </p>  </td>  <td>  <p> </p>  </td>  <td>  <p> </p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p>Compound-3</p>  </td>  <td>  <p> </p>  </td>  <td>  <p> </p>  </td>  <td>  <p>Compound-4</p>  </td>  <td>  <p> </p>  </td>  <td>  <p> </p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p> </p>  </td>  <td>  <p> </p>  </td>  <td>  <p> </p>  </td>  <td>  <p> </p>  </td>  <td>  <p> </p>  </td>  <td>  <p> </p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td rowspan="10">  <p> </p>  </td>  <td>  <p> </p>  </td>  <td>  <p> </p>  </td>  <td rowspan="10">  <p> </p>  </td>  <td>  <p> </p>  </td>  <td>  <p> </p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p>EA =</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>3.348</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>EA =</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>24.312</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p>IP =</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>6.709</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>IP =</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>22.303</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p>η =</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>1.68</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>η =</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-1.005</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p>S =</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.298</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>S =</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-0.498</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p>µ =</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>7.208</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>µ =</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>11.329</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p>E<sub>T</sub> =</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-7592.19</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>E<sub>T</sub> =</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-7564.55</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p>ω =</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>15.458</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>ω =</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-63.886</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p>χ =</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>5.028</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>χ =</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>23.308</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p> </p>  </td>  <td>  <p> </p>  </td>  <td>  <p> </p>  </td>  <td>  <p> </p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p>Compound-5</p>  </td>  <td colspan="2">  <p> </p>  </td>  <td>  <p>Compound-6</p>  </td>  <td colspan="2">  <p> </p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p> </p>  </td>  <td>  <p> </p>  </td>  <td>  <p> </p>  </td>  <td>  <p> </p>  </td>  <td>  <p> </p>  </td>  <td>  <p> </p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td rowspan="10">  <p> </p>  </td>  <td>  <p> </p>  </td>  <td>  <p> </p>  </td>  <td rowspan="10">  <p> </p>  </td>  <td>  <p> </p>  </td>  <td>  <p> </p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p>EA =</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>23.136</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>EA =</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>3.435</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p>IP =</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>20.499</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>IP =</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>5.853</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p>η =</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-1.319</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>η =</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>1.209</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p>S =</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-0.379</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>S =</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.414</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p>µ =</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>5.151</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>µ =</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>4.062</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p>E<sub>T</sub> =</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-7783.44</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>E<sub>T</sub> =</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-7783.96</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p>ω =</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-10.062</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>ω =</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>6.824</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p>χ =</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>21.817</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>χ =</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>4.644</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p> </p>  </td>  <td>  <p> </p>  </td>  <td>  <p> </p>  </td>  <td>  <p> </p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p>Compound-7</p>  </td>  <td colspan="2">  <p> </p>  </td>  <td>  <p>Compound-8</p>  </td>  <td colspan="2">  <p> </p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td colspan="6">  <p>EA  is the electron affinity in eV, IP is the ionization potential in eV, η is  the absolute hardness, and S is the global softness, µ is the dipole moment  in D, E<sub>T</sub> is the total energy in hartree, ω is the electrophilicity index,  and χ is the electronegativity of compounds as evaluated by DFT method</p>  </td> </tr></table>
</table-wrap><table-wrap id="tab2">
<label>Table 2</label>
<caption>
<p><b> Anti-leishmanial activity of compounds in term of IC</b><sub><b>50</b></sub><b> (&#x003bc;g/mL) against </b><i><b>L. major</b></i></p>
</caption>
<table> <tr>  <td rowspan="2">  <p>Compd. No</p>  </td>  <td rowspan="2">  <p>χ<sup></sup></p>  </td>  <td rowspan="2">  <p>S</p>  </td>  <td colspan="2">  <p>IC<sub>50</sub></p>  </td>  <td rowspan="2">  <p>Δ</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p>Exp.<sup> b</sup></p>  </td>  <td>  <p>Pred.<sup> c</sup></p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p>1</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>4.334</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.309</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.26</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.274</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-0.014</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p>2</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>4.070</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.290</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.28</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.307</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-0.027</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p>3</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>4.045</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.268</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.38</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.331</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.049</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p>4</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>4.359</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.328</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.24</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.254</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-0.014</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p>5</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>5.028</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.298</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.24</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.255</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-0.015</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p>6</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>23.308</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-0.498</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.25</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.249</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.001</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p>7<sup>a</sup></p>  </td>  <td>  <p>21.817</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-0.379</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.29</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.193</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.097</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p>8</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>4.644</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.414</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.17</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.150</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.020</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td colspan="6">  <p>Δ is residual, <sup>a</sup>data  point not used in deriving the Eq.1, <sup>b</sup>Experimental biological  activity in terms of IC<sub>50</sub> against <i >L. major</i>, <sup>c</sup>Theoretical activity of compounds in terms  of IC<sub>50</sub> against <i >L. majo </i>as  scanned from Eq.1 </p>  </td> </tr></table>
</table-wrap><table-wrap id="tab3">
<label>Table 3</label>
<caption>
<p><b> Anti-leishmanial activity of compounds in term of IC</b><sub><b>50</b></sub><b> (&#x003bc;g/mL) against </b><i><b>L. major (Pak)</b></i></p>
</caption>
<table> <tr>  <td rowspan="2">  <p>Compd. No</p>  </td>  <td rowspan="2">  <p>μ</p>  </td>  <td rowspan="2">  <p>E<sub>T</sub></p>  </td>  <td colspan="2">  <p>IC<sub>50</sub></p>  </td>  <td rowspan="2">  <p>Δ</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p>Exp.<sup> b</sup></p>  </td>  <td>  <p>Pred.<sup> c</sup></p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p>1</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>1.828</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-817.479</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.33</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.316</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.014</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p>2</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>2.244</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-856.797</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.32</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.325</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-0.005</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p>3<sup>a</sup></p>  </td>  <td>  <p>3.022</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-1087.84</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.30</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.337</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-0.037</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p>4</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>2.154</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-1009.23</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.31</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.318</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-0.008</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p>5</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>7.208</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-7592.19</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.24</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.235</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.005</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p>6</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>11.329</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-7564.55</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.33</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.338</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-0.008</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p>7<sup></sup></p>  </td>  <td>  <p>5.151</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-7783.44</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.22</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.177</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.043</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p>8</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>4.062</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-7783.96</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.11</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.150</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-0.040</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td colspan="6">  <p>Δ is residual, <sup>a</sup>data  point not used in deriving the Eq.2, <sup>b</sup>Experimental biological  activity in terms of IC<sub>50</sub> against <i >L. major (Pak)</i>, <sup>c</sup>Theoretical activity of compounds in  terms of IC<sub>50</sub> against <i >L.  major (Pak) </i>as scanned from Eq.2</p>  </td> </tr></table>
</table-wrap><table-wrap id="tab4">
<label>Table 4</label>
<caption>
<p><b> Anti-leishmanial activity of compounds in term of IC</b><sub><b>50</b></sub><b> (&#x003bc;g/mL) against </b><i><b>L. tropica</b></i></p>
</caption>
<table> <tr>  <td rowspan="2">  <p>Compd. No</p>  </td>  <td rowspan="2">  <p>I.P.</p>  </td>  <td rowspan="2">  <p>E.A.</p>  </td>  <td colspan="2">  <p>IC<sub>50</sub></p>  </td>  <td rowspan="2">  <p>Δ</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p>Exp.<sup> b</sup></p>  </td>  <td>  <p>Pred.<sup> c</sup></p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p>1</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>5.952</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>2.716</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.22</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.225</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-0.005</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p>2<sup>a</sup></p>  </td>  <td>  <p>5.796</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>2.344</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.39</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.232</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.158</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p>3</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>5.911</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>2.180</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.25</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.247</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.003</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p>4</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>5.885</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>2.833</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.23</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.215</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.015</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p>5</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>6.709</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>3.348</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.24</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.248</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-0.008</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p>6</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>22.303</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>24.312</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.35</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.350</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.000</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p>7<sup></sup></p>  </td>  <td>  <p>20.499</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>23.136</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.28</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.280</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.000</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p>8</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>5.853</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>3.435</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.18</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.185</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-0.005</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td colspan="6">  <p>Δ is residual, <sup>a</sup>data  point not used in deriving the Eq.3, <sup>b</sup>Experimental biological  activity in terms of IC<sub>50</sub> against <i >L. tropica</i>, <sup>c</sup>Theoretical activity of compounds in  terms of IC<sub>50</sub> against <i >L.  tropica </i>as scanned from Eq.3</p>  </td> </tr></table>
</table-wrap><table-wrap id="tab5">
<label>Table 5</label>
<caption>
<p><b> Anti-leishmanial activity of compounds in term of IC</b><sub><b>50</b></sub><b> (&#x003bc;g/mL) against </b><i><b>L. mex mex</b></i></p>
</caption>
<table> <tr>  <td rowspan="2">  <p>Compd. No</p>  </td>  <td rowspan="2">  <p>η</p>  </td>  <td rowspan="2">  <p>E<sub>T</sub></p>  </td>  <td colspan="2">  <p>IC<sub>50</sub></p>  </td>  <td rowspan="2">  <p>Δ</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p>Exp.<sup> b</sup></p>  </td>  <td>  <p>Pred.<sup> c</sup></p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p>1</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>1.618</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-817.479</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.29</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.329</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-0.039</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p>2</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>1.726</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-856.797</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.32</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.320</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.000</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p>3</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>1.865</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-1087.84</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.27</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.302</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-0.032</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p>4</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>1.526</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-1009.23</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.40</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.329</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.071</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p>5<sup>a</sup></p>  </td>  <td>  <p>1.681</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-7592.19</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.24</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.100</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.140</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p>6</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-1.004</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-7564.55</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.31</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.289</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.021</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p>7<sup></sup></p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-1.319</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-7783.44</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.28</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.304</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-0.024</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p>8</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>1.209</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-7783.96</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.13</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.127</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.003</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td colspan="6">  <p>Δ is residual, <sup>a</sup>data  point not used in deriving the Eq.4, <sup>b</sup>Experimental biological  activity in terms of IC<sub>50</sub> against <i >L. mex mex</i>, <sup>c</sup>Theoretical activity of compounds in  terms of IC<sub>50</sub> against <i >L. mex  mex </i>as scanned from Eq.4</p>  </td> </tr></table>
</table-wrap><table-wrap id="tab6">
<label>Table 6</label>
<caption>
<p><b> Anti-leishmanial activity of compounds in term of IC</b><sub><b>50</b></sub><b> (&#x003bc;g/mL) against </b><i><b>L. donovani</b></i></p>
</caption>
<table> <tr>  <td rowspan="2">  <p>Compd. No</p>  </td>  <td rowspan="2">  <p>I.P.</p>  </td>  <td rowspan="2">  <p>S</p>  </td>  <td colspan="2">  <p>IC<sub>50</sub></p>  </td>  <td rowspan="2">  <p>Δ</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p>Exp.<sup> b</sup></p>  </td>  <td>  <p>Pred.<sup> c</sup></p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p>1</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>5.952</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.309</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.39</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.279</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.111</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p>2</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>5.796</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.290</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.31</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.322</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-0.012</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p>3</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>5.911</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.268</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.32</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.347</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-0.027</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p>4</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>5.885</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.328</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.20</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.255</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-0.055</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p>5</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>6.709</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.298</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.24</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.241</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-0.001</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p>6</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>22.303</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-0.498</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.29</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.334</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-0.044</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p>7<sup></sup></p>  </td>  <td>  <p>20.499</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-0.379</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.33</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.281</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.049</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td>  <p>8</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>5.853</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.414</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.10</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>0.121</p>  </td>  <td>  <p>-0.021</p>  </td> </tr> <tr>  <td colspan="6">  <p>Δ is residual, <sup>b</sup>Experimental  biological activity in terms of IC<sub>50</sub> against <i >L. donovani</i>, <sup>c</sup>Theoretical activity of compounds in  terms of IC<sub>50</sub> against <i >L.  donovani</i> as scanned from Eq.5</p>  </td> </tr></table>
</table-wrap><p></p>
</sec><sec id="sec3">
<title>Results and Discussion</title><p>Leishmania is a parasitic protozoan. There are more than twenty species of this. These different species are morphologically indistinguishable, but they can be differentiated by isoenzyme analysis, molecular methods, or monoclonal antibodies [
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R19">19</xref>]. They are responsible for the disease leishmaniasis. Leishmaniasis is transmitted by the bite of infected female phlebotomine sand flies. Here anti-leishmanial activities are divided into five sets on the basis of their five different species. </p>
<p></p>
<p>For sake of simplicity, the anti-leishmanial activity of each leishmanial species has been studied separately as described below.</p>
<p><bold>Leishmania </bold><italic><bold>major</bold></italic></p>
<p>Prediction of anti-leishmanial of compounds listed inTable <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab1">1</xref> against this strain in terms of 50% inhibition was scanned by using following equation:</p>

<disp-formula id="FD1"><label>(1)</label></disp-formula><p>In this case quantum chemical properties listed inTable <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab1">1</xref> were used as independent variables and the experimental IC<sub>50</sub> of the compounds listed inTable <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab2">2</xref> as dependent variables. Various mathematical models were developed in which above model was selected as reliable. In this model (Eq.1) molecular electronegativity is the first descriptor and global softness is the second descriptor. <italic>r</italic><sup>2</sup> is the correlation coefficient (values higher than 0.5 have predictive power) and<italic> r</italic><sup>2</sup><sub>CV</sub> is the cross-validated correlation coefficient (values higher than 0.25 have predictive power). MLA is widely used method for building QSAR model. The coefficients of model have negative sign with respect to both &#x26;#x003c7; and S. Thus, &#x26;#x003c7; and S show inverse relationship with activity. A close examination of theTable <xref ref-type="table" rid="tabtable shows"> table shows</xref> that there is little difference between the values of experimental and theoretical inhibitory activities as evident by their residual values (&#x26;#x00394;).</p>
<p><bold>Leishmania major (Pak)</bold></p>
<p>Prediction of anti-leishmanial of compounds against this strain in terms of 50% inhibition was scanned by using following equation:</p>

<disp-formula id="FD2"><label>(2)</label></disp-formula><p>In this case quantum chemical properties listed inTable <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab1">1</xref> were used as independent variables and the experimental IC<sub>50</sub> of the compounds listed inTable <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab3">3</xref> as dependent variables. Various mathematical models were developed in which above model was selected as reliable. In this model (Eq.2) dipole moment is the first descriptor and total energy is the second descriptor. The coefficients of model have positive sign with respect to both &#x26;#x003bc; and E<sub>T</sub>. Thus, &#x26;#x003bc; and E<sub>T</sub> show direct relationship with activity.</p>
<p><bold>Leishmania</bold><italic><bold> tropica</bold></italic></p>
<p>Prediction of anti-leishmanial of compounds against this strain in terms of 50% inhibition was scanned by using following equation:</p>

<disp-formula id="FD3"><label>(3)</label></disp-formula><p>In this case quantum chemical properties listed inTable <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab1">1</xref> were used as independent variables and the experimental IC<sub>50</sub> of the compounds listed inTable <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab4">4</xref> as dependent variables. Various mathematical models were developed in which above model was selected as reliable. In this model (Eq.3) ionization potential is the first descriptor and electron affinity is the second descriptor. The coefficients of model have positive sign with respect to I.P. and have negative sign with respect to E.A. Thus, I.P. shows direct relationship with activity, while E.A. shows inverse relationship with activity.</p>
<p><bold>Leishmania</bold><italic><bold> mex mex</bold></italic></p>
<p>Prediction of anti-leishmanial of compounds against this strain in terms of 50% inhibition was scanned by using following equation:</p>

<disp-formula id="FD4"><label>(4)</label></disp-formula><p>In this case quantum chemical properties listed inTable <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab1">1</xref> were used as independent variables and the experimental IC<sub>50</sub> of the compounds listed inTable <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab5">5</xref> as dependent variables. Various mathematical models were developed in which above model was selected as reliable. In this model (Eq.4) absolute hardness is the first descriptor and total energy is the second descriptor. The coefficients of model have negative sign with respect to &#x26;#x003b7; and have positive sign with respect to E<sub>T</sub>. Thus, &#x26;#x003b7; shows inverse relationship with activity, while E<sub>T</sub> shows direct relationship with activity.</p>
<p><bold>Leishmania</bold><italic><bold> donovani</bold></italic></p>
<p>Prediction of anti-leishmanial of compounds against this strain in terms of 50% inhibition was scanned by using following equation:</p>
<p>In this case quantum chemical properties listed inTable <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab1">1</xref> were used as independent variables and the experimental IC<sub>50</sub> of the compounds listed inTable <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab6">6</xref> as dependent variables. Various mathematical models were developed in which above model was selected as reliable. In this model (Eq.5) ionization potential is the first descriptor and global softness is the second descriptor. The coefficients of model have negative sign with respect to both I.P.<bold> </bold>and S. Thus, I.P.<bold> </bold>and S show inverse relationship with activity.</p>
</sec><sec id="sec4">
<title>Conclusions</title><p>The reliability of correlation between experimental activities and predicted activities are <italic>r</italic><sup><italic>2</italic></sup><sup> </sup>= 0.826, <italic>r</italic><sup><italic>2</italic></sup><sub>CV </sub>= 0.426 (<italic>L. major</italic>,Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab2">2</xref>); <italic>r</italic><sup><italic>2</italic></sup><sup> </sup>= 0.905, <italic>r</italic><sup><italic>2</italic></sup><sub>CV </sub>= 0.507 (<italic>L. major (Pak)</italic>,Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab3">3</xref>); <italic>r</italic><sup><italic>2</italic></sup><sup> </sup>= 0.980, <italic>r</italic><sup><italic>2</italic></sup><sub>CV </sub>= 0.932 (<italic>L. tropica</italic>,Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab4">4</xref>); <italic>r</italic><sup><italic>2</italic></sup><sup> </sup>= 0.781, <italic>r</italic><sup><italic>2</italic></sup><sub>CV </sub>= 0.580 (<italic>L. mex mex</italic>,Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab5">5</xref>) and <italic>r</italic><sup><italic>2</italic></sup><sup> </sup>= 0.634, <italic>r</italic><sup><italic>2</italic></sup><sub>CV </sub>= 0.376 (<italic>L. donovani</italic>,Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab6">6</xref>), and a comparison of the experimental values and the values obtained by theoretical calculations has been presented pictorially (Figure 1,Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2"> 2</xref>,Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3"> 3</xref>,Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4"> 4</xref>,Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5"> 5</xref>) that shows close resemblance. The study reflected that descriptors derived from DFT methods have sufficient reliability to understand quantitative structure-activity relationship and also to predict the activity of new complex of this series from theoretically derived properties within limited time by QSAR models.</p>
<fig id="fig1">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Graphical representation of resemblance between experimental and theoretical % inhibition of compounds against <i>L. major</i>.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="360.fig.001" />
</fig><fig id="fig2">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Graphical representation of resemblance between experimental and theoretical % inhibition of compounds against <i>L. major (Pak)</i>.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="360.fig.002" />
</fig><fig id="fig3">
<label>Figure 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Graphical representation of resemblance between experimental and theoretical % inhibition of compounds against <i>L. tropica</i>.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="360.fig.003" />
</fig><fig id="fig4">
<label>Figure 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Graphical representation of resemblance between experimental and theoretical % inhibition of compounds against <i>L. mex mex</i>.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="360.fig.004" />
</fig><fig id="fig5">
<label>Figure 5</label>
<caption>
<p>Graphical representation of resemblance between experimental and theoretical % inhibition of compounds against <i>L. donovani</i>.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="360.fig.005" />
</fig></sec><sec id="sec5">
<title>Acknowledgement</title><p>The authors are thankful to Dr. O.P. Mishra, Ex.Principal, M.L.K. (P.G.) College, Balrampur, for providing the laboratory facilities to conduct the calculation.</p>
</sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <title>References</title>
      
<ref id="R1">
<label>[1]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Singhal K, Sahu, VK, Singh P, Raj, P (2014) DFT-Based Prediction of Antifungal and Insecticidal Activities of Perfluorophenyl-antimony(III) and -antimony(V) chlorides. Med Chem Res 23: 1758-1767. DOI 10.1007/s00044-013-0752-8
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R2">
<label>[2]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Yang N, Sun H (2010) Biological chemistry of antimony and bismuth, in biological chemistry of arsenic, antimony and bismuth (ed H. Sun), John Wiley &#x00026; Sons, Ltd, Chichester, UK. doi: 10.1002/9780470975503.ch3
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R3">
<label>[3]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Kant R, Amresh G, Chandrashekar K, Shukla SK (2009) Biological studies of some pentafluoroantimony compounds. Phosphorus, Sulfur Silicon Relat Elem 184(9): 2453-2464. doi: 10.1080/10426500 802498646
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R4">
<label>[4]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Sharma P, Perez D, Cabrera A, Rosas N, Arias JL (2008) Perspectives of antimony compounds in oncology. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 29(8): 881-889. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7254.2008.00818.x.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R5">
<label>[5]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Kant R, Singhal K, Shukla SK, Chandrashekar K, Saxena AK, Ranjan A, Raj P (2008) Synthesis and biological activity of a novel compound: (C6F5)2SbPh. Phosphorus, Sulfur Silicon Relat Elem 183(8): 2029-2039. doi: 10.1080/10426500701841763
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R6">
<label>[6]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Tiekink ERT (2002) Antimony and bismuth compounds inoncology. Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology 42(3): 217-224. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1040-8428(01)00217-7
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R7">
<label>[7]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Socaciu C, Pasca I, Silvestru C, Bar A, Haidue I (1994) Antitumor organometallics. IV. The mutagenic potential of some diphenylantimony(III) dithiophosphorus derivatives. Met-Based Drugs 1(4): 291-297. doi: 10.1155/MBD.1994.291a
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R8">
<label>[8]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Raj P, Saxena AK, Aggarwal AK (1989) The preparation of pentafluorophenyl antimony(III) and antimony(V) halides and mixed halides. J Fluorine Chem 42(2): 163-172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1139(00)82746-3
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R9">
<label>[9]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Hansch C, Leo A (1995) Exploring QSAR: Fundamentals and applications in chemistry and biology, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC. ISBN 10: 0841229872 / 0-8412-2987-2
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R10">
<label>[10]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Dearden J (2003) In silico prediction of drug toxity. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design 17(2-4), 119-127. DOI:10.1023/A:1025361621494
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R11">
<label>[11]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Singh RK, Khan AKR, Sahu VK, Singh PP (2009) Comparative QSTR study of a series of alcohol derivatives against tetrahymena pyriformis. Int J Quantum Chem 109: 185-195. doi: 10.1002/qua.21790
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R12">
<label>[12]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Sahu VK, Singh RK (2009) Prediction of bioconcentration factor of organic compounds in fish. Clean-soil, air, water 37(11): 850-857. doi: 10.1002/clen.200900170
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R13">
<label>[13]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Soni AK, Singh P, Sahu VK (2020) DFT-Based Prediction of Bioconcentration Factors of Polychlorinated Biphenyls in Fish Species Using Molecular Descriptors. Advances in Biological Chemistry 10: 1-15. https://www.scirp.org/journal/abc
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R14">
<label>[14]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Khan MI, Gul S, Hussain I, Khan, MA, Ashfaq M, Inayat-Ur-Rahnan, Ullah, F, Durrani, GF, Baloch IB, Naz R (2011) In vitro anti-leishmanial and antifungal effects of new SBIII carboxylates. Org &#x00026; Med Chem Lett 1 (2): 1-7.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R15">
<label>[15]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Leach, A.R. (2001) Molecular Modelling. Principle and Applications. Second Edition, Pearson Education Limited, Harlow.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R16">
<label>[16]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Montgomery DC, Peck EA (1992) Introduction to linear regression analysis 2nd edition. John Wiley. New York, p. 672. ISBN: 978-0-470-54281-1
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R17">
<label>[17]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">http://www.CACheSoftware.com
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R18">
<label>[18]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">Parr RG, Yang W (1989) Density functional theory of atoms and molecules, Oxford University Press, New York, p. 127.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="R19">
<label>[19]</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="other">https://www.cdc.gov/parasites/leishmaniasis/biology.htm
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>