Article Open Access July 24, 2024

Race by Sex Intersectional Differences in the Association between Allostatic Load and Depression in US Adults: 2005-2018

1
Department of Internal Medicine, Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science, Los Angeles, CA, United States
2
Department of Family Medicine, Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science, Los Angeles, CA, United States
3
Department of Urban Public Health, Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science, Los Angeles, CA, United States
4
Marginalization-Related Diminished Returns (MDRs) Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States
5
Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States
6
School of Business, University of Maryland Global Campus (UMGC), College Park, United States
Page(s): 20-33
Received
May 12, 2024
Revised
June 30, 2024
Accepted
July 22, 2024
Published
July 24, 2024
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright: Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Scientific Publications
Article metrics
Views
746
Downloads
80

Cite This Article

APA Style
Assari, S. , Azad, M. A. , & Zare, H. (2024). Race by Sex Intersectional Differences in the Association between Allostatic Load and Depression in US Adults: 2005-2018. Current Research in Public Health, 4(1), 20-33. https://doi.org/10.31586/gjeid.2024.1014
ACS Style
Assari, S. ; Azad, M. A. ; Zare, H. Race by Sex Intersectional Differences in the Association between Allostatic Load and Depression in US Adults: 2005-2018. Current Research in Public Health 2024 4(1), 20-33. https://doi.org/10.31586/gjeid.2024.1014
Chicago/Turabian Style
Assari, Shervin, Mahbube Askari Azad, and Hossein Zare. 2024. "Race by Sex Intersectional Differences in the Association between Allostatic Load and Depression in US Adults: 2005-2018". Current Research in Public Health 4, no. 1: 20-33. https://doi.org/10.31586/gjeid.2024.1014
AMA Style
Assari S, Azad MA, Zare H. Race by Sex Intersectional Differences in the Association between Allostatic Load and Depression in US Adults: 2005-2018. Current Research in Public Health. 2024; 4(1):20-33. https://doi.org/10.31586/gjeid.2024.1014
@Article{crph1014,
AUTHOR = {Assari, Shervin and Azad, Mahbube Askari and Zare, Hossein},
TITLE = {Race by Sex Intersectional Differences in the Association between Allostatic Load and Depression in US Adults: 2005-2018},
JOURNAL = {Current Research in Public Health},
VOLUME = {4},
YEAR = {2024},
NUMBER = {1},
PAGES = {20-33},
URL = {https://www.scipublications.com/journal/index.php/GJEID/article/view/1014},
ISSN = {2831-5162},
DOI = {10.31586/gjeid.2024.1014},
ABSTRACT = {Objective: Previous research has underscored the link between allostatic load—a comprehensive indicator of the cumulative physiological burden of chronic stress—and depression. However, there remains a significant gap in understanding how this relationship may differ across race and sex intersectional groups. This study aimed to investigate variations in the association between elevated allostatic load (AL>4) and depression among different race-sex intersectional groups within the general population. Methods: This cross-sectional secondary analysis utilized data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) spanning 2005-2018. The analysis included variables such as race, sex, age, socioeconomic status, depression (measured via the Patient Health Questionnaire - PHQ), and allostatic load. Linear regression analyses were conducted to examine the interactions between race and sex with allostatic load, focusing on the likelihood of high depression as the outcome. Results: Across the pooled sample, an allostatic load greater than 4 was significantly associated with increased depression. Notably, an interaction effect was observed between race and AL>4 on depression among women, indicating that non-Hispanic Black women with a high allostatic load exhibited more pronounced depressive symptoms (Beta: 1.09, CI: 0.02-2.61). Conversely, among men, allostatic load greater than 4 neither correlated with nor interacted with race to influence depression levels. Conclusion: The study highlights the critical need to consider allostatic load as a key target for interventions that aim to reduce depression among Black women. These findings underscore the necessity for customized intervention strategies that address the nuanced race-sex disparities in the impact of allostatic load on mental health across populations.},
}
%0 Journal Article
%A Assari, Shervin
%A Azad, Mahbube Askari
%A Zare, Hossein
%D 2024
%J Current Research in Public Health

%@ 2831-5162
%V 4
%N 1
%P 20-33

%T Race by Sex Intersectional Differences in the Association between Allostatic Load and Depression in US Adults: 2005-2018
%M doi:10.31586/gjeid.2024.1014
%U https://www.scipublications.com/journal/index.php/GJEID/article/view/1014
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Assari, Shervin
AU  - Azad, Mahbube Askari
AU  - Zare, Hossein
TI  - Race by Sex Intersectional Differences in the Association between Allostatic Load and Depression in US Adults: 2005-2018
T2  - Current Research in Public Health
PY  - 2024
VL  - 4
IS  - 1
SN  - 2831-5162
SP  - 20
EP  - 33
UR  - https://www.scipublications.com/journal/index.php/GJEID/article/view/1014
AB  - Objective: Previous research has underscored the link between allostatic load—a comprehensive indicator of the cumulative physiological burden of chronic stress—and depression. However, there remains a significant gap in understanding how this relationship may differ across race and sex intersectional groups. This study aimed to investigate variations in the association between elevated allostatic load (AL>4) and depression among different race-sex intersectional groups within the general population. Methods: This cross-sectional secondary analysis utilized data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) spanning 2005-2018. The analysis included variables such as race, sex, age, socioeconomic status, depression (measured via the Patient Health Questionnaire - PHQ), and allostatic load. Linear regression analyses were conducted to examine the interactions between race and sex with allostatic load, focusing on the likelihood of high depression as the outcome. Results: Across the pooled sample, an allostatic load greater than 4 was significantly associated with increased depression. Notably, an interaction effect was observed between race and AL>4 on depression among women, indicating that non-Hispanic Black women with a high allostatic load exhibited more pronounced depressive symptoms (Beta: 1.09, CI: 0.02-2.61). Conversely, among men, allostatic load greater than 4 neither correlated with nor interacted with race to influence depression levels. Conclusion: The study highlights the critical need to consider allostatic load as a key target for interventions that aim to reduce depression among Black women. These findings underscore the necessity for customized intervention strategies that address the nuanced race-sex disparities in the impact of allostatic load on mental health across populations.
DO  - Race by Sex Intersectional Differences in the Association between Allostatic Load and Depression in US Adults: 2005-2018
TI  - 10.31586/gjeid.2024.1014
ER  -