Adolescents' Psychosomatic Symptoms and Family Affluence in the Czech Republic: Based on National Evidence

Table 3.

The mediation analysis suggesting the complete mediator role of “talks toparents”.

Path Type

Effect

Estimate

SE

β

z

p

Indirect

class_family affluence1 ⇒ talk to father ⇒ diagnosis_PS

-0.02

0.00

-0.02

-10.04

< .001

class_family affluence1 ⇒ talk to mother ⇒ diagnosis_PS

0.00

0.00

0.00

-4.32

< .001

class_family affluence2 ⇒ talk to father ⇒ diagnosis_PS

-0.03

0.00

-0.02

-10.56

< .001

class_family affluence2 ⇒ talk to mother ⇒ diagnosis_PS

-0.01

0.00

-0.01

-5.47

< .001

Direct

class_family affluence1 ⇒ diagnosis_PS

-0.01

0.01

-0.01

-1.30

0.20

class_family affluence2 ⇒ diagnosis_PS

0.01

0.01

0.01

0.67

0.50

Total

class_family affluence1 ⇒ diagnosis_PS

-0.04

0.01

-0.04

-3.61

< .001

class_family affluence2 ⇒ diagnosis_PS

-0.03

0.01

-0.02

-2.33

0.02

Note: (1)Betas are completely standardized effect sizes; (2) class_family affluence1 = middle SES - low SES, class_family affluence2 = upper SES - low SES; (3) diagnosis_PS referred to the diagnosis of psychosomatic symptoms.

Note: (1)Betas are completely standardized effect sizes; (2) class_family affluence1 = middle SES - low SES, class_family affluence2 = upper SES - low SES; (3) diagnosis_PS referred to the diagnosis of psychosomatic symptoms.