|
| Author |
Proposed Work |
Dataset |
Key Findings |
Challenges/recommendation |
|
|
| Chudasama and Bhavsar (2020) |
DL + Queuing Theory model for proactive auto-scaling |
University server logs |
Improved SLA violation prediction by 5%, Enhances resource elasticity under hybrid cloud |
Static threshold auto-scaling fails under unpredictable loads, need for proactive, prediction-driven auto-scaling mechanisms in hybrid cloud environments |
|
| Chen et al. (2019) |
A self-adaptive system for allocating resources for cloud-based software applications and self-learning, utilizing genetic algorithms for optimization and machine learning for QoS modelling. |
RUBiS benchmark |
QoS prediction accuracy > 90% 10%–30% improvement in resource utilization |
Traditional policy-driven methods lead to complexity and high administrative cost; recommends ML-driven automatic decision-making to adapt to dynamic environments. |
|
| Rayan and Nah (2018) |
ML-based workload prediction for cloud data centers (RFR, SVR, PR) |
Operational workload logs |
RFR achieved lowest RMSE (11.68 for PMs, 4869.08 for PC), 2-second training time Enables proactive allocation and energy/resource efficiency |
Focused on prediction, not dynamic real-time scheduling, Need to integrate accurate workload prediction with adaptive scheduling/auto-scaling mechanisms in large-scale environments |
|
| Ataie et al. (2017) |
Hybrid methodology that integrates support vector regression (SVR) and queuing networks to forecast the duration of job execution |
Hadoop MapReduce job traces |
Achieved 21% improvement in prediction accuracy over standalone ML methods |
Need to balance accuracy and computational cost, Integration of analytical models and ML recommended for better resource management |
|
|
| Dai et al. (2016) |
A method for multi-objective optimization that is intended to maximize the price, accessibility, and efficiency of cloud-based Big Data programs. carried out on the testbed. |
Experimental setup |
Execution time improved by 20% over traditional methods- 15% higher performance than heuristics- 4–20% cost savings |
Emphasizes the need for fine-grained resource allocation in cloud infrastructure; recommends multi-objective optimization to handle competing objectives. |
|
|