Survey of Automated Testing Frameworks and Tools for Software Quality Assurance: Challenges and Best Practices
Table 1.
Comparative Analysis of Automated TestingFrameworks
|
| Framework |
Key Features |
Advantages |
Limitations |
Best Suited For |
|
|
| Keyword-Driven Testing |
Uses keywords stored in external files; separates test logic from scripts. |
High reusability, easy maintenance, reduces programming effort by defining user keywords. |
Initial setup effort is high; requires a well-defined keyword library. |
Applications requiring frequent test modifications. |
|
| Data-Driven Testing |
Separates test data from logic; executes single test scripts with multiple data sets. |
Reduces the number of scripts; high reusability; flexible and scalable. |
Debugging can be more challenging if test data is large, as it requires a careful design of the test data matrix. |
Applications with large input variations. |
|
| Behavior-Driven Testing (BDD) |
Extends TDD; focuses on customer-centric acceptance tests; uses natural language scenarios. |
Improves communication between developers, testers, and stakeholders, while enhancing code quality. |
Requires cultural shift and training; higher initial effort. |
Agile projects and systems require stakeholder collaboration. |
|
| Playback/Record Testing |
Creates test scripts by recording user interactions; minimal coding effort. |
Very easy to implement; quick automation setup. |
Poor maintainability; unstable with frequent UI changes. |
Small projects or as an entry-level automation approach. |
|
|
|