Contribution to the Ethnobotanical Knowledge of Serre Calabre (Southern Italy)
Table 4.
Most recurrenttaxa sorted by Relative Frequency ofCitation (RFC).
| | Basic value | Indices | | Taxa | UR | U | NC | FC | CI | RFC | | Sambucus nigra L. | 7 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 0.41 | 0.24 | | Malva sylvestris L. | 6 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0.35 | 0.24 | | Erica arborea L. | 7 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 0.41 | 0.18 | | Ampelodesmos mauritanicus (Poir.) T. Durand & Schinz | 6 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 0.35 | 0.18 | | Matricaria chamomilla L. | 6 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 0.35 | 0.18 | | Spartium junceum L. | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0.18 | 0.18 | | Urtica dioica L. | 5 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 0.29 | 0.12 | | Anethum foeniculum L. | 5 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 0.29 | 0.12 | | Daucus carota L. | 4 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 0.24 | 0.12 | | Lavandula angustifolia Mill. | 5 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 0.29 | 0.06 | | Equisetum telmateia Ehrh. | 4 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0.24 | 0.06 | | Umbilicus rupestris (Salisb.) Dandy | 4 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0.24 | 0.06 | | Laurus nobilis L. | 4 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0.24 | 0.06 | | Robinia pseudoacacia L. | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0.18 | 0.06 | | Hypochaeris radicata L. | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0.18 | 0.06 | | Mentha pulegium L. | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0.18 | 0.06 | | Plantago major L. | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0.18 | 0.06 | | Quercus ilex L. | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0.18 | 0.06 | | Rosa sempervirens L. | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0.18 | 0.06 | | Salvia officinalis L. | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0.18 | 0.06 | 1 Basic values: UR = Number of interviews ('citations'); U= Number of different categories of use. NC = Number of different purposes; FC = Number of informants mentioning the taxon. Indexes: CI = Cultural Importance Index.
|
Indexes: CI = Cultural Importance Index. |