Effects of Impacted Third Molars Extraction on Periodontal Status of Second Molar and Oral Health-Related Quality of Life

Table 1.

Features of the studypopulation, n (%)

Features

Treatment group(N=136)

Control group(N=136)

Gender

 

 

Male

133(97.79)

133(97.79)

Female

3(2.21)

3(2.21)

Age (yr)

 

 

≦20

36(26.47)

38(27.94)

21-30

71(52.21)

69(50.74)

31-40

25 (18.38)

23(16.91)

41

4 (2.94)

6(4.41)

Race

 

 

Han nationality

136(100)

136(100)

Educational level

 

 

Primary school

16(11.76)

16(11.76)

High school

41(30.15)

39(28.68)

Bachelor degree or higher level

79(58.09)

81(59.56)

Oral hygiene

 

 

Good

31 (22.79)

29(21.32)

Bad

105 (77.21)

107(78.68)

Smoking

 

 

Yes

76 (55.88)

77(56.62)

No

60 (44.12)

59(43.38)

Regular dental check

 

 

Yes

20 (14.71)

19(13.97)

No

116 (85.29)

117(86.03)

History of toothache due to M3

 

 

Yes

86(63.24)

83(61.03)

No

50(36.76)

53(38.97)

Seeking M3 surgery due to toothache

 

 

Yes

117 (86.03)

115(84.56)

No

19 (13.97)

21(15.44)

Impact M3 type

 

 

Soft tissue

111(81.62)

107(78.68)

Hard tissue

25(18.38)

29(21.32)

Obvious infection after M3 removal

 

 

Soft tissue

6(5.41)

(-)

Hard tissue

4(16.00)

(-)