Cancer Risk Assessment Tools in Primary Care Settings: An Integrative Review
Table 3.
Tools for Cancer Risk Assessment and Its Effectiveness
| Study | Tool | Effectiveness | | Milton et al. (2022) Australia | Colorectal Cancer Risk Prediction tool (CRISP) | This tool identified both unsuccessful and successful implementation of adaptive methodology and highlighted the significance of co-design output to use in other settings and with other risk instruments. | | Akanuwe et al. (2020) United Kingdom | QCancer tool | This tool improved patient education strategies that incorporate openness when discussing risks, patient participation in the process, and adequate consultation time within the context of a professional approach. | | Walker et al. (2017) Australia | Colorectal Cancer Risk Prediction tool (CRISP) | Clinicians were competent in hypothetical consultations, accustomed to using risk assessment tools while making therapeutic decisions, and have the capacity to use this tool effectively. | | Seesaghur et al. (2021) United Kingdom | CRAB criteria (hyperCalcaemia, Renal impairment, Anemia, Bone lesions) | Early identification of myeloma's clinical characteristics and effective use of investigations in primary care may expedite the diagnosis of multiple myeloma (MM). | | Yadav et al. (2019) United States of America | NCI Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Tool (BCRAT) | Clearly proved that the education program improved residents' awareness and application of the tool. |
|
|