Table 5.
Comparison oflaboratory investigations between case and control groups.
|
| CBC Findings |
Group |
Number |
Mean + SD |
Student’s t-test |
P Value (Sig) |
|
|
| TLC |
Case |
87 |
7.88+4.45 |
2.486 |
0.014
(Sig) |
|
| Control |
86 |
9.49+4.03 |
|
|
| Neutrophils |
Case |
87 |
6.14+4.28 |
1.189 |
0.236
(NS) |
|
| Control |
86 |
6.87+3.74 |
|
|
| Lymphocytes |
Case |
87 |
1.19+0.78 |
4.490 |
0.000
(VHS) |
|
| Control |
86 |
1.77+0.91 |
|
|
| Eosinophils |
Case |
87 |
0.06+0.10 |
3.179 |
0.002
(HS) |
|
| Control |
86 |
0.13+0.19 |
|
|
| Monocytes |
Case |
87 |
0.37+0.27 |
5.062 |
0.000
(VHS) |
|
| Control |
86 |
0.62+0.36 |
|
|
| CRP |
Case |
87 |
66.26+57.86 |
-6.465 |
0.000
(VHS) |
|
| Control |
86 |
21.79+27.56 |
|
|
| S. Ferritin |
Case |
87 |
390.6+308.8 |
-3.936 |
0.000
(VHS) |
|
| Control |
86 |
232.3+211.9 |
|
|
| ALT |
Case |
87 |
44.36+44.88 |
-3.482 |
0.001
(VHS) |
|
| Control |
86 |
26.77+14.26 |
|
|
| AST |
Case |
87 |
46.26+60.98 |
-2.782 |
0.006
(HS) |
|
| Control |
86 |
26.56+25.30 |
|
|
Sig: Significant VHS: Very highly NS: Non-Significant HS: Highly Significant
|
|
