|
| 1. WHAT — Data / Elements / Products Goal: Assess completeness and quality of endgame-relevant artifacts (laws, datasets, infrastructure). |
Conception & Initiation |
Availability of baseline prevalence & mortality datasets; Endgame policy concept papers produced |
% of states with current prevalence data; # of policy concept papers published |
|
| Policy & System Design |
Completeness of draft legislation & regulatory frameworks |
% of FCTC-recommended measures included; # of policy gaps identified |
|
| Implementation & Operation |
Campaign material coverage; Quitline/NRT resource stock |
% of population reached by campaigns; NRT supply adequacy index |
|
| Evaluation & Adaptation |
Timeliness and completeness of surveillance datasets |
Avg. lag (months) between data collection and release; % of data fields complete |
|
| Consolidation & Endgame Transition |
Endgame law enactment rate; Supply reduction instruments in place |
% of endgame measures legislated; # of retail outlets under supply quotas |
|
| Sustainment / Sunset |
Post-endgame monitoring systems operational |
% of illicit trade cases detected vs prosecuted; # of public norm reinforcement materials issued per year |
|
|
| 2. HOW — Processes / FunctionsGoal: Evaluate maturity and consistency of endgame-related processes. |
Conception & Initiation |
Quality of stakeholder engagement processes |
# of stakeholder meetings; % of priority stakeholders engaged |
|
| Policy & System Design |
Process adherence to regulatory impact assessment standards |
% of policy drafts with documented impact analysis; review cycle time (days) |
|
| Implementation & Operation |
Campaign deployment effectiveness; Compliance inspection coverage |
% of planned campaigns delivered; # of inspections per 1,000 retailers |
|
| Evaluation & Adaptation |
Responsiveness of policy adjustments |
Avg. time from new threat detection to policy update |
|
| Consolidation & Endgame Transition |
Execution speed of final cessation pushes |
% of remaining smokers reached with targeted support; weeks to implement supply quota |
|
| Sustainment / Sunset |
Continuity of surveillance and education |
% of planned monitoring events completed; % of educational programs renewed annually |
|
|
| 3. WHERE — Locations / NetworksGoal: Measure geographic reach and network integration. |
Conception & Initiation |
Geographic coverage of baseline data |
% of states with reliable baseline prevalence measures |
|
| Policy & System Design |
State-level alignment with federal frameworks |
% of states with harmonized endgame policies |
|
| Implementation & Operation |
Geographic reach of campaigns and enforcement |
% of population in covered jurisdictions; inspections per region |
|
| Evaluation & Adaptation |
Distribution of data collection sites |
% of counties with active surveillance points |
|
| Consolidation & Endgame Transition |
Cross-border enforcement coverage |
# of customs checkpoints integrated into enforcement plan |
|
| Sustainment / Sunset |
Post-endgame coverage of illicit trade monitoring |
% of high-risk border zones under continuous monitoring |
|
|
| 4. WHO — Stakeholders / ActorsGoal: Assess breadth and alignment of actors. |
Conception & Initiation |
Diversity of engaged stakeholder groups |
# of unique stakeholder categories (gov, NGO, research, community) |
|
| Policy & System Design |
Representation in policy design forums |
% of policy design meetings with multi-sector participation |
|
| Implementation & Operation |
Stakeholder participation in campaign delivery |
% of NGOs actively delivering campaign components |
|
| Evaluation & Adaptation |
Multi-stakeholder involvement in evaluation |
% of evaluation panels with non-gov participants |
|
| Consolidation & Endgame Transition |
Cross-agency coordination effectiveness |
# of joint operations conducted; % of joint objectives met |
|
| Sustainment / Sunset |
Community engagement in sustaining tobacco-free norms |
% of community groups funded for prevention activities |
|
|
| 5. WHEN — Timeframes / EventsGoal: Evaluate timeliness and synchronization. |
Conception & Initiation |
Time from problem identification to initial strategy draft |
Avg. months elapsed |
|
| Policy & System Design |
Policy drafting cycle time |
Avg. days from drafting start to legislative submission |
|
| Implementation & Operation |
Campaign and inspection timeliness |
% of activities delivered on schedule |
|
| Evaluation & Adaptation |
Speed of response to emerging threats |
Avg. days to policy update after detection |
|
| Consolidation & Endgame Transition |
Synchronization of final measures nationally |
% of states implementing endgame measures within target window |
|
| Sustainment / Sunset |
Frequency of post-endgame monitoring events |
Avg. interval (months) between surveillance reports |
|
|
| 6. WHY — Goals / MotivationsGoal: Measure clarity, alignment, and adaptability of goals. |
Conception & Initiation |
Specificity of mission statements |
% of mission statements with measurable targets |
|
| Policy & System Design |
Alignment of policy goals with national health targets |
% of goals explicitly tied to Healthy People objectives or FCTC |
|
| Implementation & Operation |
Alignment of program KPIs to strategic goals |
% of program KPIs mapping to national endgame targets |
|
| Evaluation & Adaptation |
Use of evaluation findings to adjust goals |
% of updated goals following evaluation cycles |
|
| Consolidation & Endgame Transition |
Goal clarity in final push phase |
% of endgame policies with specific prevalence targets |
|
| Sustainment / Sunset |
Maintenance of post-endgame vision |
% of strategic plans including long-term relapse prevention objectives |
|
