Optimization of Delirium Care in Adult Patients with Cancer: A Comprehensive and Integrative Review of Efficacy and Patient Outcomes
Table 3.
JBI Methodological Assessment of Studies
|
| Authors |
Mercadante et al., 2018 [41] |
De La Cruz et al., (2015) [11] |
Chishi et al., (2023) [10] |
Okuyama et al., (2019) [45] |
Agar et al., (2017) [1] |
Maeda et al., (2020) [39] |
Tatematsu et al., (2011) [48] |
Matsuda et al. (2020) [40] |
|
|
| Were there clear criteria for inclusion? |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
|
| Was the condition measured in a standard and reliable way for all participants? |
Unclear |
Yes |
Unclear |
Unclear |
Yes |
Unclear |
Unclear |
Yes |
|
| Were valid methods used in identifying conditions for all participants? |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
|
| Did the case series have consecutive inclusion for all participants? |
Yes |
Unclear |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
|
| Did the case series have a complete inclusion of participants? |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
|
| Was there clear reporting of the demographics of the participants in the studies? |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
|
| Was there clear reporting of the clinical information of the participants? |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
|
| Were there outcomes or follow-ups of cases clearly reported? |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
|
| Was there clear reporting of the presenting site(s)/clinic(s) demographics? |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
|
| Was statistical analysis appropriate? |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Unclear |
|
| Total |
8.00 |
8.00 |
8.00 |
8.00 |
8.00 |
8.00 |
8.00 |
8.00 |
|
|
|
