Science Publications

Sign Up
Sign In
Submit
World Journal of Clinical Medicine Research
Cite This Article Share Download PDF XML
  1. Home
  2. Journals
  3. World Journal of Clinical Medicine Research
  4. Archive
  5. Volume 1, Issue 1, 2022
  6. Article
Article Open Access September 04, 2022

The Effect of Parent School Counseling Programs on Anxiety, Depression and Quality of Life

Paraskevi Theofilou 1, 2,* and Georgia Tafarli 2
1
General Hospital of Thoracic Diseases ‘’SOTIRIA’’, Athens, Greece
2
Department of Psychology, Aegean College, Athens, Greece
Publihed in: World Journal of Clinical Medicine Research (Volume 1, Issue 1, 2022)
Page(s): 18-27
DOI: 10.31586/wjcmr.2022.404
Received
July 16, 2022
Revised
August 25, 2022
Accepted
September 02, 2022
Published
September 04, 2022
Keywords
Parent Education Programs; Parent Schools; Anxiety; Depression; Quality of Life; Parent Counseling
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright: Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Scientific Publications

Abstract

Parental anxiety and depression are factors that significantly affect the practice of parental role and have an impact on the upbringing of children and their quality of life. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether the counseling intervention that parents received during their participation in parent school programs reduced stress and depressive symptoms and improved their quality of life. A sample of 160 parents was collected from two independent groups: the experimental group consisting of 80 parents who participated in the program and the control group consisting of parents who after being informed about the implementation of the programs in their schools decided not to participate. The psychometric tools have been used are: The Spielberger Stress Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), the Beck depression Inventory (BDI), and the Health and well-being Questionnaire (The RAND 36-Item Healthy Survey, SF-36, Version 1.0). The results of the research confirmed the research hypothesis according to which the effect of the counseling intervention on the parents who participated in the parent schools affected the reduction of the stress index, state anxiety (Ζ=-2,882, p=0,004) and trait anxiety (Ζ=-3,776, p<0,001), the reduction of the depression index (Ζ=-6,876, p<0,001) and the improvement of their quality of life(Ζ=-5,364, p<0,001) ) especially of physical health (Ζ=-4,529, p<0,001) and emotional health (Ζ=-4,529, p<0,001).

1. Introduction

An important factor that determines parents' stress is the beliefs they have about the difficulties of their role and their personal adequacy in it, as well as about their children's behavior [1]. Parents who perceive their children as demanding, moody, and who rate communication with each other as difficult report higher parenting stress [2]. Research by Reindl et al [3], Miller et al [4], Nguyen et al [5] shows that stress makes parents less sensitive to connecting with their children and less able to tune into the same frequency with their thoughts, feelings and their needs. Another also recent research by Atiqah Azahari and his colleagues [6] proves that the effect of parental stress has a significant negative effect on the degree of effective brain synchronization observed between each parent and their child. This means that the parents, due to the increased stress, presented a lack of focus and synchronization regarding the emotional state of their child. Among adults who presented with anxiety or mood disorders in their research, Antony and colleagues [7] observed that the majority had grown up with parents who were vulnerable, anxious, overprotective, discouraging, or depressed and who could not manage significantly events of their lives.

A significant number of scientists report that parental depression is a serious mental disorder and at the same time a risk factor for children's mental health [8, 9]. Parental depression is primarily associated with deficits in interactions with children which in turn adversely affect their smooth social and emotional development [10]. Parents are arguably the most powerful social role model for their children [11]. The importance of successful attachment in the parent-child relationship is for the child to feel safe, protected and confident in order to set foot well [12]. A successful parental connection is the basis for good mental health of the child [13]. An insecure parental connection predisposes children to develop symptoms of depression and anxiety [14, 15]. And makes them very sensitive during their adolescence and subsequent adulthood [16].

Shalock et al [17] argue that quality of life is influenced by personal factors such as living conditions and sense of well-being, and by environmental factors such as marital status, education and standard of living and all these in relation to health, the psychological state, the level of independence and the social relationships of each individual [18]. The consideration of the concept of quality of life is the sum of a series of objectively measurable life conditions that a person experiences such as physical health, social relationships, functional activities as well as subjective evaluation indicators concerning personal satisfaction with life [19]. According to this distinction, the following are considered as objective indicators: the living conditions, the natural environment, the residence, health, social integration, security from external risks, the financial coverage of needs, while subjective indicators are considered: the satisfaction with life, the feeling of adequacy and satisfaction with the functionality of the individual, the satisfaction with the services provided and the possibility to participate in various activities. Quality of life is a concept that essentially reflects a person's view of himself and is evaluated in comparison to the person and the circumstances [20]. Parents' sense of self-sufficiency, the satisfaction they derive from the parental role, fatigue and stress, have been found to influence their behavior and are indirectly related to their quality of life [21]. The quality of life concerns the daily functioning and well-being of the parents which in turn affects the behavior of the children, both during childhood and in their adult life [22]. Parental self-efficacy refers to the parent's belief in their ability to adequately respond to their parenting role. The concept of self-efficacy plays a decisive role in the behavior that parents display when interacting with their children and is closely related to children's development and psychosocial adjustment [23]. It appears that parents with high self-efficacy are responsive to their children's needs, provide stimulation and do not exhibit aggressive parenting behavior [24].

Effectiveness of training programs of parenting schools The ever-increasing need of parents for training and support in order to cope better with the exercise of their parental role has led many researchers to turn to the study of the effectiveness of parent training programs in terms of the mental and emotional assistance they offer to parents with the ultimate goal of improving of relationships with their children [25, 26, 27, 28]. In Greece today, parenting school programs are available in almost every region. However, the research field regarding their effectiveness is quite limited [29, 30]. The international literature and the research data of other countries are nevertheless quite important and give us enough information about the effectiveness of secondary and tertiary prevention programs as they emerge through a series of meta-analytic reports, quantitative surveys, literature reviews and through qualitative interviews and opinions of the parents themselves about the programs. Many parents in a series of qualitative studies [31, 32, 33, 34] report that by participating in such programs they gained a lot of useful information, increased their confidence and improved their emotional state, they acquired new skills and enjoyed the support of other parents [35, 36, 37]. In fact, Kane and his colleagues [38] in their meta-ethnographic study of four qualitative studies in their attempt to evaluate parents' experiences and perceptions of the programs found that parents found these programs very useful through the acquisition of knowledge and skills that helped them reduce their stress and guilt thus feeling more capable, less isolated and depressed with more empathy, understanding and trust towards their children. In fact, his research [39] states that parents ultimately found the education programs very useful even if they were forced or forced to go to them without it being their choice in the first place In their review of the international literature, Moran and his colleagues [40] emphasize that in order to investigate what is effective and what is not in parenting programs, it would be appropriate to conduct randomized controlled studies in which there will be an experimental group, i.e. participants who will be compared before and after the intervention, and a control group, i.e. the parents who did not participate in the intervention and who, as a sample, do not differ from the participants. In another systematic review of the literature investigating 14 studies, Coren, Barlow and Stewart-Brawn [41] found that parenting programs significantly improved the emotional and psychosocial status of teenage mothers through stress reduction and education for successful coping of stressful situations. Recent research on 137 families showed that group intervention through training programs had positive effects on parents' mental health and their quality of life, contributing to the reduction of anxiety and depressive symptoms as well as improving their behavior towards children when exercising of their parental role [42, 43, 44].

The purpose of this research was to investigate whether the application of counseling intervention to parents, who participate in parenting school programs, affects their anxiety, depression and quality of life. Although a multitude of researches have been conducted abroad with the aim of investigating the effectiveness of these programs, in the Greek area there are not enough researches and studies on parents on the effect of counseling on these three variables and on the correlations between them. The main research hypothesis is that the counseling intervention affects the psychometric characteristics of the parents, bringing about a reduction of anxiety, a reduction of the depression index and an improvement of their quality of life.

2. Method

2.1. Research design

The survey is addressed to parents of primary school children, who were informed about the implementation of a parent counseling program. This is an interventional study in which before and after were investigated. The dependent variables were the indicators of anxiety, depression and quality of life, before and after counseling and the independent variable was the intervention.

2.2. Participants

A representative sample of 160 parents, who belonged to two independent groups, was collected from all the parents who were informed about the program in schools in the western and central areas of Thessaloniki. The control group consists of 80 parents, who were informed about the goals and details of the program but ultimately decided not to participate, while the research group was formed by the 80 parents who attended the program successfully. The response rate was high reaching 99%. Only one parent left the program in the middle of the process. Data collection took place from November 2019 to February 2020.

2.3. Sampling process

The completion of the questionnaires by the research team was implemented in two phases, before and after the intervention. The first phase of sampling took place at the beginning of the counseling intervention in November 2019 and the second at the end of the program in February 2020. The research team completed the counseling program in 12 two-hour sessions over a period of three months. The control group answered the same questionnaires, only once, after the end of the counseling program, in the corresponding time period, without receiving intervention. Before the start of the procedure, a demographic information sheet and a unique personal code were given to each participant in order to maintain anonymity, to ensure the confidentiality of responses and his identification, in order to correctly match the pre- and post-intervention questionnaires. The total completion time was estimated at 20-30 minutes on average, for each phase, after clear instructions were given beforehand. At the same time, they were informed about the purpose of the research but also about maintaining the anonymity and confidentiality of their personal information and the possibility of withdrawing from the research at any time they wish. The research protocol was approved by the people in charge of the counseling programs, in order to proceed with the distribution of the questionnaires while the consent of the principals and responsible parents of the schools was requested for access to the school premises.

2.4. Selection and exclusion criteria

The selection criteria of the sample were the following:

  1. Parents over 18 whose children attend primary schools.
  2. The parents have been informed about the operation of the parent school programs.
  3. Satisfactory level of cooperation and comprehension. The exclusion criteria were: The parents must have attended another parenting school program.
2.5. Research tools

To conduct the research, three questionnaires were used. The first is Spielberger's State-Trait Anxiety Inventory [45]. The anxiety questionnaire consists of 40 questions. 20 of them refer to present situation anxiety and the other 20 to general anxiety as a personality trait of a person. Scoring is done on a 4-point Likert scale from 1 to 4. In situation anxiety, the corresponding verbals are "not at all" for the value 1 to "very much" for the value 4, while in personality anxiety the value 1 corresponds to the verbal "almost never” and at value 4 “almost always”. The index values are the sum of each answer's score, after previously recalculating the values for the reverse questions. Reversed questions are those with positive conceptual content, indicating reduced anxiety. To measure depression, the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) was deemed appropriate [46]. The Beck Depression Inventory is a multiple-choice, self-report questionnaire and consists of 21 parameters. The answers are gradational. It is one of the most widely used instruments for measuring the severity of depression, from a psychodynamic point of view, while it relies less on the patient's thoughts. In its current form the questionnaire consists of factors related to symptoms of depression, such as hopelessness, irritability, guilt, or feelings such as fatigue, weight loss and lack of sexual interest. To assess quality of life, the RAND 36-Item Healthy Survey (SF-36, Version 1.0) was used [47]. The SF-36 Health Survey expresses general health conditions that are not identified as specific to any disease or treatment. It consists of 36 questions of various grading scales. Quality of life is determined by individual factors, such as physical, psychological and social functioning, energy/fatigue, emotional well-being, general health. The final factor measurement scale is 0-100. The questionnaire has very good reliability and validity [48, 49].

2.6. Statistical analysis

SPSS v. software was used for data analysis. 21. First, an analysis was made of the descriptive sample sizes. Then, the quantitative indices measuring the psychometric characteristics were calculated. The normality of variables was tested with the Kolmogorov–Smirnoff test. The effectiveness of the intervention in the experimental group was checked, with a test of equality of differences of paired observations (Paired-Samples T test / Wilcoxon), regarding the possible reduction of anxiety, depression and improvement of the quality of life. All statistical tests were performed at a significance level of α=0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Demographic characteristics

Of the 160 parent participants in the sample, 119 (74.4%) were women and 41 (25.6%) were men. Comparing the two groups, it was observed that only 34% of the men, who were informed about the parenting counseling program, actually attended it. Parents' age ranged between 22 and 61 years (M=42.48, SD=6.05). The control group scores slightly higher (M=43.68, SD=5.2) than the research group (M=41.28, SD=6.6). The average age of men in all respondents was higher than that of women (M=44.56, SD=5.8 vs. M=41.76, SD=6 years). A similar age difference between the two groups was noted between both sexes (control group: male M=45.81, SD=5.4, female M=42.58, SD=4.8 and research group: male M=42 .14, SD=5.6, women M=41.09, SD=6.8). The majority of participants have 1-2 children (78.7%). In the research group, it was observed that families with one child correspond to a percentage of 43.8% against 12.5% of the control group, in which several families with many children are also found. More generally, the average number of children per family is higher in the control group (M ≈ 2.28) than in the research group (M ≈ 1.74). (The average values were approximated by assuming that large families have exactly four children. The actual values are higher and the differences in the average values between the two groups are even greater.) 25% of parents who attended the program received professional help, compared to only 8.8% of parents in the control group. The single-parent families of the sample amount to 9.4% and are divided into the two groups. Regarding the financial situation of the families, it is generally characterized as moderate to good (94.4%). 93.2% of men work, while in 51.3% of couples both partners work. 88.8% of parents state that they have a satisfactory social life. 94.4% of the families have a moderate to good financial situation and 88.8% have a moderate to good social life. In addition, 41.3% receive financial assistance, which indicates either that the income from work is not sufficient or that they have the possibility to further strengthen their financial comfort. Of the parents who attended the program, 50% received financial assistance compared to 32.5% of those who chose not to attend.

3.2. Testing the effect of parent counseling on quality of life, anxiety and depression

The variables of quality of life, anxiety and depression, were calculated before and after the implementation of the parent counseling program and the results of the research group were compared before and after, in order to examine whether the program actually had an effect on the improvement of these indicators. Also, a comparison was made of the indicators of the research group before and after the intervention with the corresponding indicators of the control group, in order to investigate the difference between the two groups. Below are summarized the main descriptive values of the indicators, based on the collected sample, in order to give an image of the initial situation of the two groups. Descriptors are the mean and standard deviation for the two groups. A comparison of the two independent groups follows to investigate baseline differences.

As can be seen in Table 1, the parents who finally decided to attend the counseling program were in a worse position than those who did not, in terms of quality of life, the stress they experience and the degree of depression they note. All individual indicators referring to their physical and emotional health are also lower in the research group. The results of the independent samples test confirm the statistically significant difference between the two groups. A non-parametric test of dependent samples (Wilcoxon) followed in the research group, to finally examine the effectiveness of the intervention method. The test results are summarized in Table 2. It is clear that there is a statistically significant difference in all indicators, which confirms our research hypothesis. From the differences in the average values, it is confirmed that the intervention brings about an improvement in the indicators of the research group. This was followed by a comparison of the mean values of the indicators of the research group after the completion of the intervention with the corresponding mean values of the control group, in order to investigate whether there are still statistically significant differences. From Table 3 it can be seen that the initial differences in the two groups have almost leveled off after the counseling intervention, to such an extent that the initial statistically significant difference no longer exists in almost all the dependent variables. Mann-Whitney tests showed that there was still a significant difference between the two groups in limitations due to physical condition (U=2525.0, p=0.019) and limitations due to emotional state (U=2540.0, p=0.022).

Table 1
Comparison of indicators of the research group before the implementation of the counseling method and the control group. Independent samples variation test.
Table 2
Comparison of indicators before and after the intervention in the research group (N=79).
Table 3
Comparison of mean indicators of the research group before the implementation of the counseling method and the control group. Independent samples variation test.

4. Discussion

Counseling interventions of parenting schools from the early stages of the child's development seem to be able to contribute to the modification of dysfunctional behaviors of both parents and children and prevent them from developing into serious problems in their adult lives. They can act as mechanisms that help parents get close to their feelings, explore them, get to know them better and move towards self-awareness [50]. Prevention programs such as those of parenting schools will aim to increase the knowledge, awareness and skills of parents to recognize but also to reduce dysfunctional emotions and situations both for themselves and for their children. The parent counseling program resulted in a significant reduction in anxiety and depression scores, which led to an increase in the participants' self-rated quality of life. This is related to the previous findings of other research such as MacNeil [35], Barlow & Stewart-Brown [32], which show that education programs that are done to support and train parents in managing dysfunctional emotions, such as anxiety and depression are effective. They also agree with the findings of Link [33], Budd et al. [32] who argue that with the aim of improving the relationship and communication with children, many parents through them significantly improve their emotional and social well-being. They also agree with the results of studies that state that parents by participating in the training programs not only got very important information and acquired skills but also significantly increased their self-confidence after they managed to improve their bad emotional state [38, 39, 41]. Research by McMahan and his colleagues [43], as well as by Chadwick and his colleagues [44] come to show results consistent with this study as they argue that parent education programs have positive effects specifically on mental health and quality of life contributing to the successful reduction of participants' anxiety and depressive symptoms.

As mentioned above in the importance of research, unfortunately in Greece there are not enough published studies that examine this type of data so that the results of this particular study can be compared with them [30, 31]. On the other hand, in terms of international literature, there is a considerable number of researches, meta-analyses, and literature reviews that evaluate and demonstrate the effectiveness of parent education programs. However, the results of most of the above research examine secondary and tertiary prevention parent education programs, which are aimed at specific groups of parents, without presenting enough evidence for programs aimed at the general population. The parenting school programs are aimed at the general population since any parent can attend them with their main objective being prevention and not treatment. Thus, the comparison of the results of the present study is made with the research data of the international literature which is mainly available in the secondary and tertiary prevention. As far as the sample of this study is concerned, this concerns a very small percentage of parents who participate in parenting schools throughout Greece. Therefore, it is not possible to generalize to the entire population of parents who participate in them. The results obtained from the present study can be further investigated in samples of parenting schools and from other regions of Greece (Central and Regional), giving the possibility of controlling the variables under study and comparing the results, so that they can be more general and safer conclusions. The indicators of the control group were recorded only once, after the completion of the intervention, in contrast to the research group, which completed the questionnaires twice, once before and once after the intervention. Under this option, it has been accepted that the choices of the control group are not influenced by extraneous factors other than the counseling intervention.

References

  1. Young, JE., Klosko, JS., Weishaar, ME. (2003). Schema therapy: A practioner’s Guide. New York: The Guilford Press.[CrossRef]
  2. Bauer, NS., & Webster-Stratton, C. (2006). Prevention of behavioral disorders in primary care. Current Opinion in Pediatrics 18: 654-660[CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Reindi, V., Gerloff, C., Scharke, W. and Konrad, K. (2018). Brain- to- brain Synchrony In parent –child dyads and the relationship with emotion regulation revealed by fNIRS based heperscanning. Neuroimage. 178:493-502.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Miller, JG., Vrticka,, P., Cui, X., Shrestha, S., Hosseini, SMH, Baker, JM. and Reiss AL. (2019). Inter- brain synchrony in mother- child dyads during cooperation: An fNIRS hyper scanning study. Neuropsychology 124:117-124[CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Nguyen, T., Schleihauf, H., Kayhan, E., Matthes, D., Vrticka, P., Hoehl, S. (2020) The effects of interaction quality on neural synchrony during mother-child. Problem solving. Cortex. 124:235-249.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Azhari,A., Leck, WQ., Gabrieli, G., Bizzego, A., Rigo, P., Setoh, P., Bornstein, MH., Esposito, G. (2019). Parenting Stress Undermines Mother-Child Brain-to Brain Synchrony: A Hyper scanning Study.Rep.69(1):11407[CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Luby, J., Belden, A., Botteron, K., Marrus, N., Harms, MP, Babb, C., Nishino,T., Barch, D. (2013). The effects of poverty on childhood brain development: The mediating effect of care giving and stressful life events. JAMA Pediatr. 167(12): 1135-42.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Anthony, L., Anthony, B., Glanville, D., Naiman, D., Waanders, C., &Shaffer, S. (2005). The relationships between parenting stress, parenting behavior and preschooler’s social competence and behavior problems in the classroom. Infant And Child Development, 14 (2), 133-154.[CrossRef]
  9. Lovejoy, C., Graczyk, P., O’Harre, E., & Neuman, G. (2000). Maternal depression and parenting behavior: a meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 20, 561- 592[CrossRef]
  10. Olson, M., Marcus, S., Druss, B., Pincus , H.,& Weissman, M.(2003).Parental depression , child mental health problems, and health care utilization. Medical Care, 41, 716-721.[CrossRef]
  11. Hanington, L., Ramchandani, P., & Stein, A. (2010). Parental depression and child temperament: Assessing child to parent effects in a longitudinal population study. Infant Behavior & Development, 33, 88-95.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Ingram, RE., Trenary, L., Odom, M., Berry, L., Nelson, T. (2007). Cognitive, affective and social mechanisms in depression risk: cognition, hostility, and coping style. Cogn Emot 21(1):78-94[CrossRef]
  13. Thompson, RA. (2008). Early attachment and later development, familiar questions new answers. In: Cassidy, J., Shaver, P.(eds) Handbook of attachment, theory, research, and clinical applications. New York: The Guildford Press.
  14. Kullik, A. & Petermann, F. (2013). Attachment to parents and peers as a risk factor for adolescent depressive disorders: the mediating role of emotion regulation. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev 44(4):537-548.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Morley, TE. & Moran, G. (2011). The origins of cognitive vulnerability in early childhood: mechanisms linking early attachment to later depression. Clin Psychol Rev31(7):1071-1082.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Jinyao, Y., Xionghao, Z., Auerbach, RP., Gardiner, CK., Lin, C., Yuping, W., et al. (2012). Insecure attachment as a predictor of depressive and anxious symptomatology. Depress Anxiety29 (9):789-796.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Agerup, T., Lydersen, S., Wallander, J., Sund, AM. (2014). Longitudinal course of diagnosed depression from ages 15 to 20 in a community sample: patterns and parental risk factors. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. Doi: 10.1007/s10578-014-0444-8.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Schalock, R.L., & Verduco-Alonso,M.A. (2002). Handbook on quality of life for Human service practioners. Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation.
  19. Mugno, D.G., Ruta, L., D’Arringo, V. & Mazzone, L. (2007). Impairment of Quality of life in parents of children and adolescents with pervasive. Developmental disorder. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 5 (22), 1-9.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Migerode, F., Maes , B.A. & Brondeel, R. (2012). Quality of Life in Adolescents With Disability and their Parents: The Mediating Role of Social Support Resilience. Journal of Development and Physical Disabilities, 24 (5),487-503[CrossRef]
  21. Renaud, J. & Bedard, E. (2013). Depression in the elderly with visual impairment and Its association with quality of life. Clinical interventions in aging, 8, 931.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Baker, B.L., Blacher, J. & Olsson, M.B. (2005). Preschool children with and without development delay: Behavioral problems, parents’ optimism, and well-being. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 49 (8), 575-590.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Renaud, J., Levasseur, M., Gresset, J., Overbury, O., Wanet- Defalque, M.C., Dubois, M.F., Temisjan, N., Vincent, C., Garignan,M., & Desrosiers, J. 2010). Health-related and subjective quality of life of older adults with visual Impairment. Disability and rehabilitation, 32 (11), 899-907.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Jones T, Prinz R. Potential roles of parental self-efficacy in parent and child adjustment: a review (2005). Clin Psychol Rev. 2005; 25: 341- 363.[CrossRef]
  25. Zubrick S, Smith GJ, Nicholson JM, Sanson AV, Jackiewicz TA. (2008). LSAC Research Consortium. Parenting and families in Australia. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs; 2008. P. 199. Report No.:34
  26. McCarthy MC, Lumley MN. (2012). Sources of Emotional Maltreatment and the Differential Development of unconditional and Conditional Schemas. Cogn Behav Ther. 2012. doi: 10.1080/16506073.2012.676669.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Sanders MR. (2008). Triple P-Positive Parenting Program as a public health approach to strengthening parenting. J Fam Psychol. 2008; 22(3): 506–517.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Conners NA, Edwards MC, Grant AS. (2007). An evaluation of a parenting class curriculum for parents of young children: Parenting the strong-willed child. J Child Fam Stud. 2007; 16:321 – 330[CrossRef]
  29. Chaffin M, Funderburk B, Bard D, Valle LA, Gurwitch R. (2011). A combined motivation and parent-child interaction therapy package reduces child welfare recidivism in a randomized dismantling field trial. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2011; 79:84–95.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Konstandinidis, L., Gopa, P., Nikolaidis, N., Simos, G., Mavreas, V. (2008). Effectiveness of a group-based cognitive behavioral parent training Program in Greece. Psychomed 3(2): 12. .
  31. Vlachogianni, A. & Aggeli, K. (2014). Parenting Programs. Institute of Behavior Research and Therapy, 1(1): 41-53 Athens, 2014
  32. Barlow, J.& Stewart-Brown, S. (2001). Understanding parenting programmes: parent’s views. Primary Health Care Research and Development, 2(2): 117-130[CrossRef]
  33. Budd K, Felix E, Sweet S, Saul, A, Carleton R. (2006). Evaluating parents in child protection decisions: An innovative court-based clinic model. Prof Psycho Res Pr. 2006; 37:666-675[CrossRef]
  34. Linke, P. (2001). What works? A literature review of the evidence for the Effectiveness of parenting strategies, child and youth health. Child and Youth Health, Adelaide.
  35. McNeil C, Hembree-Kigin, T. Parent-child interaction therapy. 2nd ed. New York: Springer;2010.[CrossRef]
  36. Petersson, K., Petersson, C. & Hakansson, A. (2004). What is good parental education? Interviews with parent who have attended parental education sessions. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences 18(1):82-89.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Stewart-Brown, S., Patterson, J., Mockford, C., Barlow, J., Klimew, I., Pyper, C. (2004). Impact of a general practice-based group parenting programme Quantitative and qualitative results from a controlled trial at 12 months. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 89(6): 519-525.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Tully, L. (2009). What makes parenting programmes effective? An overview of Recent research. NSW Community Services, Centre for Parenting and Research, Sydney.
  39. Kane, GA., Wood, VA., & Barlow, J. (2007). Parenting programmes: a systematic Review and synthesis of qualitative research. Child: Care, Health and Development 33(6):787-793.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Mockford, C. & Barlow, J. (2004). Parenting programmes: some unintended consequences. Primary Care Research and Development 5(3): 219-227.[CrossRef]
  41. Moran, P., Ghate, D. & van der Mrwe, A. (2004). What works in parenting support? A review of the International Evidence, Policy Research Bureau, Research Report RR574. Department for Education and Skills, London, 2004.
  42. Coren, E., Barlow, J., Stewart-Brown, S. (2004). The effectiveness of individual and group- based parenting programmes in improving outcomes for teenage mothers and their children: a systematic review. Journal of Adolescence 26 (1): 79-103.[CrossRef]
  43. McMahon RJ, Forehand R. Helping the noncompliant child: Family-based treatment for oppositional behavior. New York: Guilford Press;2003
  44. Chadwick O, Momcilovic N, Rossiter R, Stumbles E. (2001). A randomized trial of brief individual versus group parent training for behaviour problems in children with severe learning disabilities. Behav Cogn Psychoth. 2001;29:151-167.[CrossRef]
  45. Spielberger, G.O. (1970). The State- Trait Anxiety Inventory. California: Consulting Psychologists Press.
  46. Liakos, A. and Giannitsi, S. (1884). Η αξιοπιστία και εγκυρότητα της τροποποιημένη Ελληνικής κλίμακας άγχους του Spielberger. Εγκέφαλος 21 71-76
  47. Beck AT, Steer RA, and Garbing MG, “Psychometric Properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: Twenty-Five Years of Evaluation”, Clin Psychol Rev, 1988,8:77-100[CrossRef]
  48. Ware, JE. & Sherbourne, CD. (1992), The MOS 36- Item short- form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care 30 (6): 473-83.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Wight, JP., Edwards, l., Brazier, J., Walters, S., Payne, JN., Brown, CB. (1998). The SF-36 as an outcome measure of services for end-stage renal failure. Quality of health Care: 7:209-221.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Kenrick, D.T., Griskevicius, V., Neuberg, S.L., & Schaller, M. (2010). Renovating The pyramid of needs: Contemporary extensions built upon Ancient Foundations. Perspectives of Psychological Science. 5,292-314. Doi:10.1177/1745691610369469[CrossRef] [PubMed]
Article metrics
Views
540
Downloads
196

Cite This Article

APA Style
Theofilou, P. , & Tafarli, G. (2022). The Effect of Parent School Counseling Programs on Anxiety, Depression and Quality of Life. World Journal of Clinical Medicine Research, 1(1), 18-27. https://doi.org/10.31586/wjcmr.2022.404
ACS Style
Theofilou, P. ; Tafarli, G. The Effect of Parent School Counseling Programs on Anxiety, Depression and Quality of Life. World Journal of Clinical Medicine Research 2022 1(1), 18-27. https://doi.org/10.31586/wjcmr.2022.404
Chicago/Turabian Style
Theofilou, Paraskevi, and Georgia Tafarli. 2022. "The Effect of Parent School Counseling Programs on Anxiety, Depression and Quality of Life". World Journal of Clinical Medicine Research 1, no. 1: 18-27. https://doi.org/10.31586/wjcmr.2022.404
AMA Style
Theofilou P, Tafarli G. The Effect of Parent School Counseling Programs on Anxiety, Depression and Quality of Life. World Journal of Clinical Medicine Research. 2022; 1(1):18-27. https://doi.org/10.31586/wjcmr.2022.404 
@Article{wjcmr404,
AUTHOR = {Theofilou, Paraskevi and Tafarli, Georgia},
TITLE = {The Effect of Parent School Counseling Programs on Anxiety, Depression and Quality of Life},
JOURNAL = {World Journal of Clinical Medicine Research},
VOLUME = {1},
YEAR = {2022},
NUMBER = {1},
PAGES = {18-27},
URL = {https://www.scipublications.com/journal/index.php/WJCMR/article/view/404},
ISSN = {2834-3158},
DOI = {10.31586/wjcmr.2022.404},
ABSTRACT = {Parental anxiety and depression are factors that significantly affect the practice of parental role and have an impact on the upbringing of children and their quality of life. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether the counseling intervention that parents received during their participation in parent school programs reduced stress and depressive symptoms and improved their quality of life. A sample of 160 parents was collected from two independent groups: the experimental group consisting of 80 parents who participated in the program and the control group consisting of parents who after being informed about the implementation of the programs in their schools decided not to participate. The psychometric tools have been used are: The Spielberger Stress Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), the Beck depression Inventory (BDI), and the Health and well-being Questionnaire (The RAND 36-Item Healthy Survey, SF-36, Version 1.0). The results of the research confirmed the research hypothesis according to which the effect of the counseling intervention on the parents who participated in the parent schools affected the reduction of the stress index, state anxiety (Ζ=-2,882, p=0,004) and trait anxiety (Ζ=-3,776, p<0,001), the reduction of the depression index (Ζ=-6,876, p<0,001) and the improvement of their quality of life(Ζ=-5,364, p<0,001) ) especially of physical health (Ζ=-4,529, p<0,001) and emotional health (Ζ=-4,529, p<0,001).},
}
%0 Journal Article
%A Theofilou, Paraskevi
%A Tafarli, Georgia
%D 2022
%J World Journal of Clinical Medicine Research

%@ 2834-3158
%V 1
%N 1
%P 18-27

%T The Effect of Parent School Counseling Programs on Anxiety, Depression and Quality of Life
%M doi:10.31586/wjcmr.2022.404
%U https://www.scipublications.com/journal/index.php/WJCMR/article/view/404

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Theofilou, Paraskevi
AU  - Tafarli, Georgia
TI  - The Effect of Parent School Counseling Programs on Anxiety, Depression and Quality of Life
T2  - World Journal of Clinical Medicine Research
PY  - 2022
VL  - 1
IS  - 1
SN  - 2834-3158
SP  - 18
EP  - 27
UR  - https://www.scipublications.com/journal/index.php/WJCMR/article/view/404
AB  - Parental anxiety and depression are factors that significantly affect the practice of parental role and have an impact on the upbringing of children and their quality of life. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether the counseling intervention that parents received during their participation in parent school programs reduced stress and depressive symptoms and improved their quality of life. A sample of 160 parents was collected from two independent groups: the experimental group consisting of 80 parents who participated in the program and the control group consisting of parents who after being informed about the implementation of the programs in their schools decided not to participate. The psychometric tools have been used are: The Spielberger Stress Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), the Beck depression Inventory (BDI), and the Health and well-being Questionnaire (The RAND 36-Item Healthy Survey, SF-36, Version 1.0). The results of the research confirmed the research hypothesis according to which the effect of the counseling intervention on the parents who participated in the parent schools affected the reduction of the stress index, state anxiety (Ζ=-2,882, p=0,004) and trait anxiety (Ζ=-3,776, p<0,001), the reduction of the depression index (Ζ=-6,876, p<0,001) and the improvement of their quality of life(Ζ=-5,364, p<0,001) ) especially of physical health (Ζ=-4,529, p<0,001) and emotional health (Ζ=-4,529, p<0,001).
DO  - The Effect of Parent School Counseling Programs on Anxiety, Depression and Quality of Life
TI  - 10.31586/wjcmr.2022.404
ER  -
  1. Young, JE., Klosko, JS., Weishaar, ME. (2003). Schema therapy: A practioner’s Guide. New York: The Guilford Press.[CrossRef]
  2. Bauer, NS., & Webster-Stratton, C. (2006). Prevention of behavioral disorders in primary care. Current Opinion in Pediatrics 18: 654-660[CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Reindi, V., Gerloff, C., Scharke, W. and Konrad, K. (2018). Brain- to- brain Synchrony In parent –child dyads and the relationship with emotion regulation revealed by fNIRS based heperscanning. Neuroimage. 178:493-502.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Miller, JG., Vrticka,, P., Cui, X., Shrestha, S., Hosseini, SMH, Baker, JM. and Reiss AL. (2019). Inter- brain synchrony in mother- child dyads during cooperation: An fNIRS hyper scanning study. Neuropsychology 124:117-124[CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Nguyen, T., Schleihauf, H., Kayhan, E., Matthes, D., Vrticka, P., Hoehl, S. (2020) The effects of interaction quality on neural synchrony during mother-child. Problem solving. Cortex. 124:235-249.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Azhari,A., Leck, WQ., Gabrieli, G., Bizzego, A., Rigo, P., Setoh, P., Bornstein, MH., Esposito, G. (2019). Parenting Stress Undermines Mother-Child Brain-to Brain Synchrony: A Hyper scanning Study.Rep.69(1):11407[CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Luby, J., Belden, A., Botteron, K., Marrus, N., Harms, MP, Babb, C., Nishino,T., Barch, D. (2013). The effects of poverty on childhood brain development: The mediating effect of care giving and stressful life events. JAMA Pediatr. 167(12): 1135-42.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Anthony, L., Anthony, B., Glanville, D., Naiman, D., Waanders, C., &Shaffer, S. (2005). The relationships between parenting stress, parenting behavior and preschooler’s social competence and behavior problems in the classroom. Infant And Child Development, 14 (2), 133-154.[CrossRef]
  9. Lovejoy, C., Graczyk, P., O’Harre, E., & Neuman, G. (2000). Maternal depression and parenting behavior: a meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 20, 561- 592[CrossRef]
  10. Olson, M., Marcus, S., Druss, B., Pincus , H.,& Weissman, M.(2003).Parental depression , child mental health problems, and health care utilization. Medical Care, 41, 716-721.[CrossRef]
  11. Hanington, L., Ramchandani, P., & Stein, A. (2010). Parental depression and child temperament: Assessing child to parent effects in a longitudinal population study. Infant Behavior & Development, 33, 88-95.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Ingram, RE., Trenary, L., Odom, M., Berry, L., Nelson, T. (2007). Cognitive, affective and social mechanisms in depression risk: cognition, hostility, and coping style. Cogn Emot 21(1):78-94[CrossRef]
  13. Thompson, RA. (2008). Early attachment and later development, familiar questions new answers. In: Cassidy, J., Shaver, P.(eds) Handbook of attachment, theory, research, and clinical applications. New York: The Guildford Press.
  14. Kullik, A. & Petermann, F. (2013). Attachment to parents and peers as a risk factor for adolescent depressive disorders: the mediating role of emotion regulation. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev 44(4):537-548.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Morley, TE. & Moran, G. (2011). The origins of cognitive vulnerability in early childhood: mechanisms linking early attachment to later depression. Clin Psychol Rev31(7):1071-1082.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Jinyao, Y., Xionghao, Z., Auerbach, RP., Gardiner, CK., Lin, C., Yuping, W., et al. (2012). Insecure attachment as a predictor of depressive and anxious symptomatology. Depress Anxiety29 (9):789-796.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Agerup, T., Lydersen, S., Wallander, J., Sund, AM. (2014). Longitudinal course of diagnosed depression from ages 15 to 20 in a community sample: patterns and parental risk factors. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. Doi: 10.1007/s10578-014-0444-8.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Schalock, R.L., & Verduco-Alonso,M.A. (2002). Handbook on quality of life for Human service practioners. Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation.
  19. Mugno, D.G., Ruta, L., D’Arringo, V. & Mazzone, L. (2007). Impairment of Quality of life in parents of children and adolescents with pervasive. Developmental disorder. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 5 (22), 1-9.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Migerode, F., Maes , B.A. & Brondeel, R. (2012). Quality of Life in Adolescents With Disability and their Parents: The Mediating Role of Social Support Resilience. Journal of Development and Physical Disabilities, 24 (5),487-503[CrossRef]
  21. Renaud, J. & Bedard, E. (2013). Depression in the elderly with visual impairment and Its association with quality of life. Clinical interventions in aging, 8, 931.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Baker, B.L., Blacher, J. & Olsson, M.B. (2005). Preschool children with and without development delay: Behavioral problems, parents’ optimism, and well-being. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 49 (8), 575-590.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Renaud, J., Levasseur, M., Gresset, J., Overbury, O., Wanet- Defalque, M.C., Dubois, M.F., Temisjan, N., Vincent, C., Garignan,M., & Desrosiers, J. 2010). Health-related and subjective quality of life of older adults with visual Impairment. Disability and rehabilitation, 32 (11), 899-907.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Jones T, Prinz R. Potential roles of parental self-efficacy in parent and child adjustment: a review (2005). Clin Psychol Rev. 2005; 25: 341- 363.[CrossRef]
  25. Zubrick S, Smith GJ, Nicholson JM, Sanson AV, Jackiewicz TA. (2008). LSAC Research Consortium. Parenting and families in Australia. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs; 2008. P. 199. Report No.:34
  26. McCarthy MC, Lumley MN. (2012). Sources of Emotional Maltreatment and the Differential Development of unconditional and Conditional Schemas. Cogn Behav Ther. 2012. doi: 10.1080/16506073.2012.676669.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Sanders MR. (2008). Triple P-Positive Parenting Program as a public health approach to strengthening parenting. J Fam Psychol. 2008; 22(3): 506–517.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Conners NA, Edwards MC, Grant AS. (2007). An evaluation of a parenting class curriculum for parents of young children: Parenting the strong-willed child. J Child Fam Stud. 2007; 16:321 – 330[CrossRef]
  29. Chaffin M, Funderburk B, Bard D, Valle LA, Gurwitch R. (2011). A combined motivation and parent-child interaction therapy package reduces child welfare recidivism in a randomized dismantling field trial. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2011; 79:84–95.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Konstandinidis, L., Gopa, P., Nikolaidis, N., Simos, G., Mavreas, V. (2008). Effectiveness of a group-based cognitive behavioral parent training Program in Greece. Psychomed 3(2): 12. .
  31. Vlachogianni, A. & Aggeli, K. (2014). Parenting Programs. Institute of Behavior Research and Therapy, 1(1): 41-53 Athens, 2014
  32. Barlow, J.& Stewart-Brown, S. (2001). Understanding parenting programmes: parent’s views. Primary Health Care Research and Development, 2(2): 117-130[CrossRef]
  33. Budd K, Felix E, Sweet S, Saul, A, Carleton R. (2006). Evaluating parents in child protection decisions: An innovative court-based clinic model. Prof Psycho Res Pr. 2006; 37:666-675[CrossRef]
  34. Linke, P. (2001). What works? A literature review of the evidence for the Effectiveness of parenting strategies, child and youth health. Child and Youth Health, Adelaide.
  35. McNeil C, Hembree-Kigin, T. Parent-child interaction therapy. 2nd ed. New York: Springer;2010.[CrossRef]
  36. Petersson, K., Petersson, C. & Hakansson, A. (2004). What is good parental education? Interviews with parent who have attended parental education sessions. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences 18(1):82-89.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Stewart-Brown, S., Patterson, J., Mockford, C., Barlow, J., Klimew, I., Pyper, C. (2004). Impact of a general practice-based group parenting programme Quantitative and qualitative results from a controlled trial at 12 months. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 89(6): 519-525.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Tully, L. (2009). What makes parenting programmes effective? An overview of Recent research. NSW Community Services, Centre for Parenting and Research, Sydney.
  39. Kane, GA., Wood, VA., & Barlow, J. (2007). Parenting programmes: a systematic Review and synthesis of qualitative research. Child: Care, Health and Development 33(6):787-793.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Mockford, C. & Barlow, J. (2004). Parenting programmes: some unintended consequences. Primary Care Research and Development 5(3): 219-227.[CrossRef]
  41. Moran, P., Ghate, D. & van der Mrwe, A. (2004). What works in parenting support? A review of the International Evidence, Policy Research Bureau, Research Report RR574. Department for Education and Skills, London, 2004.
  42. Coren, E., Barlow, J., Stewart-Brown, S. (2004). The effectiveness of individual and group- based parenting programmes in improving outcomes for teenage mothers and their children: a systematic review. Journal of Adolescence 26 (1): 79-103.[CrossRef]
  43. McMahon RJ, Forehand R. Helping the noncompliant child: Family-based treatment for oppositional behavior. New York: Guilford Press;2003
  44. Chadwick O, Momcilovic N, Rossiter R, Stumbles E. (2001). A randomized trial of brief individual versus group parent training for behaviour problems in children with severe learning disabilities. Behav Cogn Psychoth. 2001;29:151-167.[CrossRef]
  45. Spielberger, G.O. (1970). The State- Trait Anxiety Inventory. California: Consulting Psychologists Press.
  46. Liakos, A. and Giannitsi, S. (1884). Η αξιοπιστία και εγκυρότητα της τροποποιημένη Ελληνικής κλίμακας άγχους του Spielberger. Εγκέφαλος 21 71-76
  47. Beck AT, Steer RA, and Garbing MG, “Psychometric Properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: Twenty-Five Years of Evaluation”, Clin Psychol Rev, 1988,8:77-100[CrossRef]
  48. Ware, JE. & Sherbourne, CD. (1992), The MOS 36- Item short- form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care 30 (6): 473-83.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Wight, JP., Edwards, l., Brazier, J., Walters, S., Payne, JN., Brown, CB. (1998). The SF-36 as an outcome measure of services for end-stage renal failure. Quality of health Care: 7:209-221.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Kenrick, D.T., Griskevicius, V., Neuberg, S.L., & Schaller, M. (2010). Renovating The pyramid of needs: Contemporary extensions built upon Ancient Foundations. Perspectives of Psychological Science. 5,292-314. Doi:10.1177/1745691610369469[CrossRef] [PubMed]