Back to Article
Provision of Pre-pregnancy Care for Women with Pre-existing Diabetes in Lagos, Nigeria: An Exploratory Qualitative Study
World Journal of Nursing Research
| Vol 5, Issue 1
Table 1. COREQ (COnsolidated criteria for REportingQualitative research) -32 ITEM checklist
| No | Item | Guide questions/description | Reported on Page # |
| Domain 1: Research team and reflexivity | |||
| Personal Characteristics | |||
| 1. | Interviewer/facilitator | Which author/s conducted the interview or focus group? | Page 9 |
| 2. | Credentials | What were the researcher’s credentials? E.g PhD, MD | Page 12 |
| 3. | Occupation | What was their occupation at the time of the study? | Page 12 |
| 4. | Gender | Was the researcher male or female? | Page 0 |
| 5. | Experience and training | What experience or training did the researcher have? | Page 12 |
| Relationship with participants | |||
| 6. | Relationship established | Was a relationship established prior to study commencement? | Page 9 |
| 7. | Participant knowledge of the interviewer | What did the participants know about the researcher? E.g Personal goals, reason for doing the research | Page 9 |
| 8. | Interviewer characteristics | What characteristics were reported about the interviewer? | Page 9 |
| Domain 2: Study design | |||
| Theoretical framework | |||
| 9. | Methodological Orientation and Theory | What methodological orientation underpins the study stated? eg grounded theory, discourse analysis, ethnography, phenomenology, content analysis | Page 8 |
| Participant selection | |||
| 10. | Sampling | How were the participants selected? E.g, purposive, convenience, consecutive snowball | Page 9 |
| 11. | Method of approach | How were the participant approached? E.g, face-to-face, telephone, mail, email | Page 9 and 10 |
| 12. | Sample size | How many participants were in the study? | Page 9 |
| 13. | Non-participation | How many people refused to participate or dropped out? Reasons | Page 0 |
| Setting | |||
| 14. | Setting of data collection | Where was the data collected? Eg, home, clinic, workplace | Page 8 |
| 15. | Presence of non-participants | Was anyone else present besides the participants and researchers? | Page 10 |
| 16. | Description of sample | What are the important characteristics of the sample? E.g demographic data, date | Page 14 |
| Data collection | |||
| 17. | Interview guide | Were questions, prompts guides provided by the author? Was it pilot tested? | Page 9 |
| 18. | Repeat interviews | Were repeat interviews carried out? If yes, how many? | Page 9 |
| 19. | Audio/visual recording | Did the researcher use audio or visual recording to collect the data? | Page 10 |
| 20. | Field notes | Were field notes made during and / or after the interview or focus group? | Page 10 |
| 21 | Duration | What was the duration of the interview or focus group? | Page 10 |
| 22. | Data saturation | Was data saturation discussed | Page 10 |
| 23 | Transcripts returned | Were transcripts returned to participants for comment and / or correction? | Page 0 |
| Domain 3: Analysis and finding | |||
| Data analysis | |||
| 24. | Number of data coders | How many coders coded the data? | Page 11 |
| 25. | Description of data coding tree | Did author provider a description of the coding tree? | Page 11 |
| 26. | Derivation of themes | Were themes identified in advance or derived from the data? | Page 11 |
| 27. | Software | What software, if applicable, was used to manage the data? | Page 11 |
| 28. | Participant checking | Did participants provide feedback on the findings? | Page 0 |
| Reporting | |||
| 29. | Quotations presented | Were participants quotations presented to illustrate the themes/ findings? Was each quotation identified? | ResultPage 15 to 21 |
| 30. | Data and findings consistent | Was there consistency between the data presented and the findings? | ResultPage 15 to 21 |
| 31. | Clarity of major themes | Were major themes clearly presented in the findings? | Result and DiscussionPage 21 to 23 |
| 32. | Clarity of minor themes | Is there a description of diverse cases or discussion of minor themes? | Result and DiscussionPage 21 to 23 |