Publication Ethics

Upholding the highest standards of integrity in scholarly publishing

Quick Navigation

Our Ethical Commitment

Scientific Publications is committed to upholding the highest ethical standards in scholarly publishing. We adhere to the principles and guidelines established by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), the World Association of Medical Editors (WAME), and the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE).

Core Principles: Integrity, transparency, fairness, and accountability guide all our publishing practices.
Integrity
Maintaining honesty in all aspects of publishing
Transparency
Clear disclosure of processes and conflicts
Fairness
Impartial treatment of all submissions
Accountability
Responsibility for published content

Guidelines for Authors

Originality and Plagiarism

Authors must ensure that their work is entirely original. Any use of others' work must be properly cited and referenced. Plagiarism in all forms—including self-plagiarism—is unethical and unacceptable. All submissions are screened using plagiarism detection software.

Authorship and Contributorship

All listed authors must have made substantial intellectual contributions to the research and manuscript preparation. The corresponding author ensures that all co-authors have reviewed and approved the final version. Gift, guest, or ghost authorship is prohibited.

Conflict of Interest Disclosure

Authors must disclose any financial, personal, or professional relationships that could influence their work. A conflict of interest statement is required at the time of submission.

Data Availability and Reproducibility

Authors should make the data supporting their findings available whenever possible. Transparency in data reporting enables reproducibility and verification of results.

Multiple, Redundant, or Concurrent Publication

Authors should not submit the same manuscript to more than one journal simultaneously. Publishing the same research in multiple journals constitutes unethical behavior.

Research Involving Human or Animal Subjects

Research involving human participants must have ethical approval and informed consent. Animal studies must comply with institutional guidelines for animal care and use.

Guidelines for Reviewers

Confidentiality

Reviewers must maintain strict confidentiality. Manuscripts are privileged communications and should not be shared or discussed with others outside the review process.

Timeliness

Reviewers should respond promptly to invitations and submit reviews within the agreed timeframe. If unable to review, decline promptly so alternatives can be found.

Objectivity and Fairness

Reviews must be objective, constructive, and free from personal criticism. Judgments should be based on scientific merit, not nationality, gender, or institutional affiliation.

Conflict of Interest Disclosure

Reviewers must disclose any conflicts of interest that could affect their impartiality. If a conflict exists, decline the review invitation.

Acknowledgment of Sources

Reviewers should identify any relevant published work not cited by the authors. Any similarity between the manuscript and other works should be reported.

Guidelines for Editors

Editorial Independence

Editors make decisions based on scientific merit, not commercial interests or personal relationships. Editorial independence is fundamental to maintaining trust in the publication process.

Fair Play

Editors evaluate manuscripts solely on their intellectual content without discrimination based on race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, or political philosophy.

Confidentiality

Editors must not disclose information about submitted manuscripts to anyone other than reviewers and editorial staff.

Conflict of Interest Disclosure

Editors must recuse themselves from handling manuscripts where they have conflicts of interest. Alternative editors should be assigned.

Investigation of Misconduct

Editors have a duty to investigate allegations of misconduct and take appropriate action, including contacting institutions or issuing corrections.

Handling Misconduct

Zero Tolerance Policy: We take all allegations of misconduct seriously and investigate thoroughly.

Types of Misconduct

  • Plagiarism (including self-plagiarism)
  • Data fabrication or falsification
  • Citation manipulation
  • Unauthorized use of material
  • Ghostwriting or guest authorship
  • Undisclosed conflicts of interest
  • Simultaneous submission to multiple journals

Investigation Process

  1. Initial assessment of the allegation
  2. Request for explanation from the accused party
  3. Consultation with experts or institutional authorities
  4. Decision on appropriate action
  5. Notification to relevant parties

Possible Sanctions

  • Rejection of manuscript with explanation
  • Publication of correction or retraction
  • Ban on future submissions (temporary or permanent)
  • Notification to institutional ethics committees
  • Reporting to funding agencies or professional bodies

Ethical Policies

AI and Authorship

Artificial intelligence tools cannot be listed as authors. Authors using AI in research or manuscript preparation must disclose this use. AI cannot be responsible for content integrity.

ORCID Requirement

All corresponding authors are encouraged to register for an ORCID iD to ensure proper attribution and prevent identity confusion.

Data Sharing Policy

Authors are encouraged to deposit data in recognized repositories. Data availability statements are required for all published articles.

Corrections and Retractions

We publish corrections for honest errors and retractions for serious misconduct. All changes are clearly noted and linked to the original article.

Reporting Ethical Concerns

If you have concerns about ethical issues in any manuscript or published article, please contact our ethics committee:

Ethics Committee

Email: editorial@scipublications.com

Confidential Reporting: All reports are handled confidentially and investigated promptly.

Report Concern