Caste-based Diminished Returns of Educational Attainment on Wealth Accumulation in India
Table 4.
Logistic Regression Model Without and WithIntersection of Education and Caste
|
| |
Beta |
SE |
OR |
95% CI |
|
Sig |
|
|
| Main Effect Model (Model 1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Age |
-.043 |
.001 |
.958 |
.957 |
.959 |
< .001 |
|
| Scheduled Caste |
.814 |
.009 |
2.257 |
2.215 |
2.299 |
< .001 |
|
| Education |
|
|
|
|
|
< .001 |
|
| Primary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Secondary |
-1.332 |
.011 |
.264 |
.258 |
.270 |
< .001 |
|
| Higher |
-2.554 |
.019 |
.078 |
.075 |
.081 |
< .001 |
|
| Location (Urban) |
-1.913 |
.014 |
.148 |
.144 |
.152 |
< .001 |
|
| Constant |
1.631 |
.022 |
5.107 |
|
|
< .001 |
|
| Interaction Model (Model 2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Age |
-.043 |
.001 |
.958 |
.957 |
.959 |
< .001 |
|
| Scheduled Caste |
.747 |
.016 |
2.111 |
2.048 |
2.176 |
< .001 |
|
| Education |
|
|
|
|
|
< .001 |
|
| Primary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Secondary |
-1.374 |
.017 |
.253 |
.245 |
.261 |
< .001 |
|
| Higher |
-2.762 |
.029 |
.063 |
.060 |
.067 |
< .001 |
|
| Education x Caste |
|
|
|
|
|
< .001 |
|
| Secondary Education x Scheduled Caste |
.069 |
.020 |
1.071 |
1.030 |
1.114 |
< .001 |
|
| Higher Education x Scheduled Caste |
.371 |
.038 |
1.449 |
1.346 |
1.559 |
< .001 |
|
| Location Urban |
-1.910 |
.014 |
.148 |
.144 |
.152 |
< .001 |
|
| Constant |
1.669 |
.024 |
5.309 |
|
|
< .001 |
|
|
|
