Research Journal of Ecology and Environmental Sciences
Article | Open Access | 10.31586/rjees.2024.883

Salsola tragus L. (Amaranthaceae) and Thymelaea gussonei Boreau (Thymelaeaceae): new records for the native vascular flora of Calabria (S-Italy) with some remarks about their taxonomy and distribution

Alberto Capuano1, Giulia Montepaone2, Valerio Lazzeri3 and Giuseppe Caruso1,4,*
1
Agraria Department, Mediterranean University of Reggio Calabria, Loc. Feo di Vito snc, 89122 Reggio Calabria, Italy
2
Corso Roma 39C, 88068 Soverato Superiore (CZ), Italy
3
Via Fiorenza 1/C, 57125 Livorno, Italy
4
Istituto Tecnico Agrario “V. Emanuele II”, Via Cortese 1, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy

Abstract

Recent field investigations, performed across some of the less floristically known sectors of Calabria, have led to the discovery of Salsola tragus and Thymelaea gussonei, two new species for the regional vascular flora. By providing crucial biogeographical and taxonomic remarks, this work aims to contribute to the improvement of the knowledge of the rich, diversified and still poorly known native flora of Calabria. The biogeographical value of these new findings underlines the decisive role of field survey in the enhancement of the information on regional biodiversity, the essential basis for every further ecological study and conservation effort.

1. Introduction

Calabria is one of the floristically richest regions of continental Italy, with approximately 2,550 native vascular taxa [1] and around 270 endemic taxa, according to Peruzzi et al. [2]. Biogeographical isolation and dramatically changing ecology (mountains close to the coast, diversified geology, geomorphology and bioclimate, etc.) have significantly contributed to its great phytodiversity [3, 4, 5, 6, 7].

Over the last century, the floristic survey of Calabria has led to a significant improvement in our understanding of the regional vascular flora, even resulting in the description of new taxa [8, 9, 10, 11]. Despite this significant enhancement, according to Bernardo et al. [12], large areas of Calabria still lack adequate floristic knowledge.

In fact, despite the richness of the Calabrian flora, the analysis carried out by D’Antraccoli et al. [13] provided a low value of SAR (species-area ratio) for the region, thus possibly underestimating its floristic abundance, and, above all, demonstrating the crucial role of detailed floristic survey in the evaluation of species richness for a given geographical area. In Italy, Salsola tragus L. and Thymelaea gussonei Boreau did not receive satisfying taxonomic treatments, resulting in frequent misidentifications and possibly incomplete distribution data. According to Bartolucci et al. [1], S. tragus occurs as a native species in the administrative regions of Lombardy, Veneto, Friuli Venezia-Giulia, Liguria, Emilia-Romagna, Tuscany, Latium, Campania, Apulia, Basilicata, Sicily and Sardinia (as a cryptogenic, naturalized or casual alien in Valle D’Aosta, Piedmont and Trentino Alto-Adige), whereas Th. gussonei is known to occur in Tuscany, Marche, Sicily and Sardinia.

Salsola tragus belongs to the highly critical group of taxa formerly known as Salsola sect. Kali Dumort., temporarily transferred to the genus Kali Mill. [14] and, shortly after, proposed to be maintained under the genus Salsola with its conserved type S. kali L. [15]. This taxonomic group is currently represented in Italy by S. tragus and S. squarrosa Steven ex Moq. subsp. controversa (Tod. ex Lojac.) [1]. For a long time, this latter taxon has been considered by Italian authors as Salsola kali [e.g. 16,17], whereas it has subsequently been referred to as S. tragus L. subsp. pontica (Pall.) Rilke [18].

Salsola tragus was described by Linnaeus [19], three years after S. kali L. [20], as having delicate (laevibus) leaves, and quoting, among the synonyms, the polynomial name “Kali spinosum foliis longioribus & angustioribus” provided by Tournefort [21]. In the second edition of Species Plantarum, Linnaeus [22] added the adjective “scabra” (scabrous) to S. kali, while no further information was given for the indumentum of S. tragus. With regard to past treatments of the Italian flora, it emerges that almost all authors regarded S. tragus as a species typically occurring in coastal habitats, thereby coexisting with the other taxon once thought to be S. kali and now designated as S. squarrosa subsp. controversa [23]. Furthermore, the same Italian authors often adopted diagnostic characters that usually are no longer emphasized in modern treatments. This could imply that some of the plants treated as S. tragus in the earlier Italian works could have been simply forms of S. squarrosa subsp. controversa. Therefore, it is also possible that S. tragus could be quite rare, or even absent, in many Italian regions.

Thymelaea gussonei belongs to the genus Thymelaea Mill., which comprises about 33 herbaceous and bushy species with a Mediterranean-Asiatic distribution [24]. T. gussonei belongs to the sect. Ligia (Fasano) Meisn., which includes annual herbaceous species with a thin and slender habit, monoecious, andromonoecious or hermaphroditic flowers, amphistomatic leaves, inflorescences in axillary glomeruli protected by 2 bracts and persistent hypanthium [25]. This taxon has a Mediterranean distribution, occurring in Spain, Portugal, Italy, Malta, France (Corse), Cyprus, Israel, Palestine, Jordan, Lebanon, Syria, European and Asiatic Turkey, Algeria, Greece, Morocco, Tunisia [25, 26, 27, 28], and also outside the strictly Mediterranean area, in Bulgaria [28, 29].

Originally described as Stellera pubescens Guss. [30] for many Sicilian localities, it has been later renamed by the same author as Passerina pubescens Guss. [31], as distinct from Thymelaea passerina (L.) Coss. & Germ. (at that time named as Passerina annua Wikstr.) on the basis of the different flowering period, hairiness and length of bracts in relation to flowers and fruits. It was later considered as a variety of T. passerina by some authors [32, 33, 34], but not by others [35, 16, 17]. Recent treatments [36, 37, 27] point out as diagnostic features the indumentum of the upper part of the stem (sparse to rather dense in T. gussonei, glabrous to very sparse in T. passerina), the length of the bracts and the sexuality of flowers. T. passerina has only bisexual flowers, while in T. gussonei male, female and rarely hermaphroditic flowers are usually represented in the same specimen [25, 27]. Female and hermaphroditic flowers may be easily pinpointed because the ovary soon swells. Based on these characters, Lazzeri et al. [38] documented the presence of T. gussonei in Tuscany, where it turned out to be more prevalent than T. passerina.

This research aims to report the first findings of these two native species in the region as part of a broader strategy of botanical survey of the Calabrian territory performed by this research group.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study area

Calabria is the southernmost continental region of Italy, surrounded by the Ionian and Tyrrhenian Sea to the east and west, and by Messina Strait to the south. It is abruptly separated from continental Italy by the Pollino massif, whose highest mountain top is represented by Serra Dolcedorme (2,267 m a.s.l.). The complex orography – characterized by the proximity of the mountain ranges of the Calabrian Apennine (Pollino, Orsomarso, Sila, Catena Costiera, Serre and Aspromonte) to the coastline – coupled with its highly heterogeneous geology, are the underlying cause of the considerable climatic and floristic diversity occurring in Calabria [39].

As part of the investigation of floristically poorly known areas of central Calabria, many localities have been surveyed during the last years. Among these, one stand occurring in the province of Vibo Valentia and two in the province of Crotone provided interesting floristic data here reported (Figure 1).

2.2. Specimen, data collection and mapping

The surveyed stands and the specimens collected have been georeferenced using a GPS device (Garmin Montana 650t). Each plant has been collected and dried in at least two voucher copies applying the standard herbarium techniques. Exsiccata have been stored in the herbarium of the Department of Agraria, Mediterranean University of Reggio Calabria (coded REGGIO, according to Thiers [40]). A voucher copy of each specimen has also been stored in the private Herbarium Capuano (Catanzaro).

Maps have been drawn using QGIS software [41] and data have been tabled using Microsoft Excel software [42].

Nomenclature, taxa delimitation, and regional distribution are reported according to Bartolucci et al. [1]. Salsola tragus has been identified mainly following Mosyakin [43] and Rilke [44], but also on the basis of original observations. The identification of Thymelaea gussonei follows Tan [36] and Pedrol [25]. Life forms and native ranges have been provided according to Pignatti [17], Pignatti [27], POWO [28], Portal to the Flora of Italy [45] and the database of the Acta Plantarum website [46].

For the surveyed areas, climate features and thermopluviometric charts have been provided by Zepner et al. [47], while bioclimatic classification has been provided according to Rivas-Martinez & Rivas-Saenz [48].

For each taxon, the following information has been reported: accepted scientific name and most relevant synonyms (homotypic and heterotypic, according to POWO [28]), plant family and native range; life form; collection date and discovery localities (municipality, administrative province); exsiccata with details on the location according to the information reported on the specimen label; decimal degrees geographic coordinates (datum WGS84), altitude (m a.s.l.), habitat features, climate and bioclimate; legit and determinavit; herbaria where the specimens are stored, and the new status for Calabria.

Appendix A provides a photographic repertory showing the morphological peculiarities of the specimens and the ecological conditions of the surveyed sites.

3. Results

Two taxa, new to the native vascular flora of Calabria, have been found and here reported.

3.1. Salsola tragus L., in Cent. Pl. II: 13 (1756)

Homotypic synonyms: Kali tragus (L.) Scop., in Fl. Carniol., ed. 2, 1: 175 (1771); Salsola kali L. subsp. tragus (L.) Čelak., in Prodr. Fl. Böhmen: 155 (1871).

Heterotypic synonyms: Salsola kali L. var. tenuifolia Tausch, in Flora 11: 326 (1828); Salsola pestifer A. Nelson, in J.M.Coulter & A.Nelson, Man. Bot. Rocky Mt., ed. 2: 169 (1909); Salsola kali L. subsp. ruthenica Soó, in B.A.Keller & al., in Weeds USSR 2: 137 (1934); Salsola iberica (Sennen & Pau) Botschantzev ex Czerepanov, in Svod Dopolneniĭ i izmeneniĭ k Flore SSSR: 192 (1973); Kali basalticum C. Brullo, Brullo, Gaskin, Giusso, Hrusa & Salmeri, in Phytotaxa 201: 259 (2015).

Amaranthaceae – Mediterranean-Euro-Asiatic Temperate – Scapose therophyte – First record for Calabria.

Specimen: 18th November 2023, Ogliastretto Locality, Belvedere di Spinello (Crotone Province), olive grove, 16.901028°E-39.228028°N, 392 m a.s.l., leg. G. Caruso, A. Capuano, G. Montepaone, det. V. Lazzeri, A. Capuano, G. Caruso, G. Montepaone (REGGIO, Herbarium Capuano).

According to Marchetti et al. [49], the geology of this area is characterized by the dominance of sandstone and sands, which is the only geological formation identified during our field investigations in Calabria. The climate of the area (referred to the close thermo-pluviometric station of Belvedere di Spinello, erroneously named as San Giovanni in Fiore; Figure 2) is warm temperate with dry and hot summers, according to the Köppen-Geiger Climate Classification [50] and to Zepner et al. [47]. According to the bioclimatic classification provided by Rivas-Martinez & Rivas-Saenz [48], the area has a Mediterranean macrobioclimate, Transitional Oceanic-Mediterranean bioclimate, Mesomediterranean thermotype and Subhumid ombrotype. The stand counts about 50 plants and is located in a rural context among extensive olive groves, approximately 18 km as the crow flies from the Ionian Sea coast. The natural vegetation surrounding the crops includes species such as Smilax aspera L., Cistus creticus L., Euphorbia spinosa L., Euphorbia rigida M.Bieb., Artemisia campestris L. subsp. variabilis (Ten.) Greuter, Cytisus infestus (C.Presl) Guss. subsp. infestus, Dasypyrum villosum (L.) P.Candargy, Erysimum crassistylum C.Presl subsp. crassistylum, Convolvulus elegantissimus Mill., Glebionis segetum (L.) Fourr., Raphanus raphanistrum L. subsp. raphanistrum, Foeniculum vulgare Mill., Hyparrhenia hirta (L.) Stapf subsp. hirta, Bituminaria bituminosa (L.) C.H.Stirt.

3.2. Thymelaea gussonei Boreau, in Mém. Soc. Acad. Maine Loire 4: 121 (1858)

Homotypic synonyms: Stellera pubescens Guss., in Fl. Sicul. Prodr. 1: 466 (1827); Thymelaea arvensis Lam. subsp. pubescens (Guss.) Arcang., in Comp. Fl. Ital.: 604 (1882); Thymelaea passerina (L.) Coss. et Germ. subsp. pubescens (Guss.) Meikle, in Fl. Cyprus 2: 1897 (1985).

Heterotypic synonyms: Ligia pubescens C.A.Mey., in Bull. Cl. Phys.-Math. Acad. Imp. Sci. Saint-Pétersbourg 1: 358 (1843); Thymelaea puberula Hand.-Mazz. in Ann. K. K. Naturhist. Hofmus. 27: 86 (1913).

Thymelaeaceae – Steno-Mediterranean – Scapose therophyte – First record for Calabria.

Specimina: 16th September 2023, Scoglio Locality, Zungri (Vibo Valentia Province), semi-natural vegetation at the margin of an olive grove, 38.630965°N-15.952938°E, 592 m a.s.l., leg. A. Capuano, G. Montepaone, G. Caruso, det. V. Lazzeri, A. Capuano, G. Caruso, G. Montepaone (REGGIO, Herbarium Capuano); 9th December 2023, Contrada Donato, badlands between Crotone and Capo Colonna (Crotone Province), slope of the impluvium, 39.037365°N-17.156057°E, 16 m a.s.l., leg. A. Capuano, G. Caruso, G. Montepaone, det. V. Lazzeri, A. Capuano, G. Caruso, G. Montepaone (REGGIO, Herbarium Capuano).

According to Marchetti et al. [51], the Vibo Valentia stand is situated between two distinct geological formations, granite and ancient river terraces. The climate of the area (referred to the close thermo-pluviometric station of Vibo Valentia; Figure 2) is warm temperate with dry and hot summers according to the Köppen-Geiger Climate Classification [50] and to Zepner et al. [47]. According to the bioclimatic classification provided by Rivas-Martinez & Rivas-Saenz [48], the area has a Temperate macrobioclimate, Transitional Oceanic-Temperate bioclimate, Mesomediterranean thermotype and Subhumid ombrotype. The station counts less than 10 plants, and includes species such as Dactylis glomerata L. subsp. hispanica (Roth) Nyman, Rubus ulmifolius Schott, Clematis vitalba L., Achillea ligustica All., Origanum vulgare L. subsp. viridulum (Martrin-Donos) Nyman, Eupatorium cannabinum L. subsp. cannabinum, Pentanema squarrosum (L.) D.Gut.Larr., Santos-Vicente, Anderb., E.Rico & M.M.Mart.Ort., Odontites vernus (Bellardi) Dumort. subsp. serotinus Corb., Cynosurus echinatus L. and Macrobriza maxima (L.) Tzvelev.

The geology of the Crotone area is predominantly clay-based, according to Marchetti et al. [52], and the climate (referred to the close thermo-pluviometric station of Crotone; Figure 2) is warm temperate with dry and hot summers, according to the Köppen-Geiger Climate Classification [50] and to Zepner et al. [47]. According to the bioclimatic classification provided by Rivas-Martinez & Rivas-Saenz [48], the area has a Mediterranean macrobioclimate, Mediterranean Oceanic bioclimate, Thermomediterranean thermotype and Subhumid ombrotype. The investigated taxon in this stand is represented by about 20 plants, accompanied by species such as Dactylis glomerata L. subsp. hispanica (Roth) Nyman, Leontodon tuberosus L., Bellis sylvestris Cirillo, Crepis vesicaria L. s.l., Daucus carota L., Arisarum vulgare O.Targ.Tozz. subsp. vulgare and Galatella linosyris (L.) Rchb.f. subsp. linosyris.

4. Discussion

The tangled, controversial and sometimes contradictory interpretation of the ecology and of the characters considered to have some diagnostic value may certainly have contributed to the taxonomic confusion on Salsola tragus. In this regard, a selected review of interpretations is reported.

Savi [53] documented the presence of both species in the coastal area near Pisa, as well as along the Arno and the Serchio rivers, underlining that S. tragus exhibited hairy stems, while S. kali had broader leaves. Moricand [54] reported both S. kali and S. tragus, distinguishing the latter as lacking the “membranaceous appendices” in fruits. Additionally, he noted that the two taxa share the same ecology and flowering period. Shortly later, Tenore [55] employed a primarily hair-based differentiation between S. tragus and S. kali, asserting that the former was glabrous. Gussone [30] recorded for Sicily only S. tragus, as a glabrous plant growing in sandy coastal habitats. Bertoloni [56] reported both S. kali and S. tragus but referred to the latter as being distinct for the absence of hairs, the longer and slightly erose tepals, and the larger fruiting perianth wings, as well as mentioning just coastal localities. Steven [57] provided an extremely succinct description of the new species S. squarrosa Steven ex Moq. from Naxos (Greece). Moris [58], on the basis of a specimen of S. tragus in the Linnaean Herbarium (LINN), claimed that it differed from S. kali just for the narrower and glabrous leaves, limiting the occurrence of S. kali s.l. in Sardinia to coastal sandy habitats. Caruel [59] reported S. tragus for Tuscany as a synonym of S. kali, listing only coastal localities. Cesati et al. [33] distinguished S. tragus, as a variety of S. kali, as displaying an erect and reddish stem instead of being prostrate and green as the type. Arcangeli [34] reported S. tragus, as a variety of S. kali, also in inland localities and, interestingly, describing it as having slender leaves. Fiori & Paoletti [35], and later Fiori [16], referred to S. tragus, again as a variety of S. kali, as a plant almost glabrous with nearly wingless fruiting perianth. Sommier, first for the Pelagie Islands [60] and later for Pantelleria [61], reported only S. tragus and included S. controversa in its variability. Baroni [62] mentioned only S. kali for the whole Italian territory. Pignatti [17] attributed to S. tragus, as a subspecies of S. kali, glabrous plants with wingless fruiting perianth, also highlighting this name should probably be applied to individuals not growing along the coast. Giardina et al. [63] reported S. tragus for Sicily as unconfirmed. More recently, Brullo et al. [64] distinguished S. tragus from S. squarrosa subsp. controversa [as Kali pontica (Pallas) Sukhorukov] on the basis of the tepals, lacerate in the first and entire in the latter; and the fruiting perianth, well-developed and caducous in the first, nearly absent or poorly-developed and persistent in the latter. Plants growing in non-coastal habitats of Mount Etna (Sicily) were described as Kali basalticum C. Brullo, Brullo, Gaskin, Giusso, Hrusa & Salmeri [65], but shortly after synonymized as S. tragus in Bartolucci et al. [66]. Regarding K. basalticum, on a preliminary basis, it is possible to underline the strong morphological similarities with S. tragus and the possibility that the proposed diagnostic characters could actually fall within the extreme variability of the latter species. Pignatti [27] reported the two taxa as subspecies of S. tragus [as S. tragus L. subsp. tragus and subsp. pontica (Pall.) Rilke] and distinguished them on the basis of the habitus, hairiness, stem color, fruiting tepals wings length and fruiting bracts and bracteoles. The same author proposed that S. tragus L. subsp. tragus should have been bristly, often red stripped and linked to riparian habitats; conversely, S. tragus L. subsp. pontica Auct. non (Pall.) Rilke (= S. squarrosa subsp. controversa) should have been sub-glabrous, green (or yellow-greenish) colored, occurring on rocky sea coast or sub-halophitic environments, and extremely rare in Italy where it has only been confirmed in Sicily, near Palermo, and along the Adriatic coast near Cervia.

Earlier authors, as already highlighted by Rilke [44], Desfontaines [67], Reichenbach [68] and Ascherson & Graebner [69], referred to S. tragus as a plant with slender leaves, in contrast to those of S. kali and more in accordance with its protologue and its type [70]. Moreover, Clinton [71], comparing the coastal and the inland plants of North America, when citing some morphological differences of S. tragus and S. kali, stated the latter is a coarser plant, with a less bushy and less rigid habitus, with less colored and more coriaceous fruiting perianth wings. More recently, Aellen & Akeroyd [72] lowered S. tragus to the subspecific rank of S. kali and described it as having swollen bracts and being a coastal plant. The first modern author who made a thorough distinction between S. tragus and S. kali s.l. [including both subsp. kali and subsp. pontica (Pallas) Mosyakin] with regard to their morphology and ecology, was Mosyakin [43], who provided a diagnostic key highlighting the narrow and slightly succulent leaves characterizing S. tragus, in comparison with those more succulent of S. kali. Shortly after, Rilke [44], working on what was formerly known as Salsola section Salsola, separated S. tragus subsp. tragus from the coastal Pontic-Mediterranean subsp. pontica on the basis of the more branched habitus, the less succulent leaves and the mostly winged fruiting perianth in the first, together with different ecology. According to the quoted literature, the distinction of S. tragus from the typically coastal plants must be performed considering the characters of leaves (width and succulence), habitus, frequency, position along branches of broadly winged fruiting perianth (color and wings), fruiting structure (if at least some of the bracts are markedly swollen at fructification), and ecological adaptations. On the other hand, it must be highlighted that S. squarrosa subsp. controversa shows a huge morphological variability, especially depending on the growing conditions. Plants developing in sites sheltered from the direct influence of the sea often tend to be less succulent and erect, thus somehow resembling S. tragus. On the contrary, plants observed in the most forward parts of the dunes are usually prostrate-ascending and markedly succulent. According to the literature and on the basis of the observations performed on the examined material, leaves are the most reliable morphological character to distinguish the two taxa, being slightly succulent and comparatively much narrower in S. tragus, along with the less stinging apical spines on leaves, bracts and bracteoles. Also, the fruiting bracts are a useful character, since in S. squarrosa subsp. controversa they are manifestly swollen below the flowers, while in S. tragus they are comparatively much less swollen. From an ecological point of view, S. tragus does not behave like a typical psammophyte. Although it can grow by the sea, it usually prefers inland localities, often in ruderal habitats, but also in natural environments such as steppes and mountains. Conversely, S. squarrosa subsp. controversa commonly chooses sandy dunes or, less frequently, rocky coast habitats [44]. Extremely rare are the recorded ephemeral stands of this taxon in inland areas. According to Bartolucci et al. [1] and other literature [18, 73, 74], Salsola tragus occurs in Italy in all the Northern regions (sometimes locally reported as introduced), while in the South of the country this taxon has been recorded in the two main Italian islands (Sardinia, Sicily) and in most of the continental regions except Molise and Calabria. As far as its conservation status in Italy is concerned, because of the long-lasting misconception on its identity, at the present not enough data are available to make any hypothesis. Rilke [44] hypothesized that its westward expansion from Eastern Europe could have occurred in the first half of the XX century, with all the expected consequences for the native status of S. tragus in Italy.

Prior to the present finding, Thymelaea gussonei was known to occur in Italy only in Sicily, Sardinia, Marche [66] and Tuscany [38]. However, the occurrence of Th. gussonei in the Italian peninsula may have been underestimated, because the species was not included in Pignatti [17], since T. passerina is the only annual species of Thymelaea recorded in this flora, and because the ecology of the taxon is not fully understood. According to Pedrol [25] and Pignatti [27], open habitats (meadows, fields, ruderal communities) with low level of competition from woody plants, seem to be preferred by Th. gussonei, while Gussone [30] and Pignatti [27] consider the species to be mostly a clay-specialist. Conversely, Th. passerina could be more calciphilous [27]. Concerning its conservation at national level, we only have available data for Tuscany where, as already pointed out, Th. gussonei is not rare, although it is not common either. Nevertheless, we hypothesize that these data could indicate a favorable state of conservation for Italy even though a thorough revision of the herbarium material and in-depth floristic researches seem to be necessary.

5. Conclusions

Due to the small number of stands and individuals of Salsola tragus and Thymelaea gussonei found in the present survey, it is certainly desirable that further field investigations would be carried out in Calabria, in order to ascertain the real consistency and distribution of the two taxa at a regional level. At the same time, it appears essential that, within the framework of the actions undertaken by the Regione Calabria on biodiversity conservation, the populations found within the regional territory would be carefully monitored.

While it is certainly possible that the inconspicuous biological and growth form (scapose therophytes), the phenology (late summer-autumn-winter) and even the synanthropic or semi-natural environments shared by the two taxa reported here have contributed to the so far missed finding of these species, it is not possible to exclude erroneous identifications in the past, also due to the somewhat confusing and sometimes contradictory taxonomic frameworks and literature. Therefore, in order to better define the distribution of the two taxa in the national territory, a careful review of the herbarium specimens preserved in the main national herbaria could be very useful.

In the last few decades, the size of the vascular flora of Calabria has increased thanks to the description of new species, the discovery of species already known to science, and the confirmation of species reported in the past and no longer found. The discovery of the two native species reported here, new to the vascular flora of Calabria, confirms the floristic richness of the region, even though this area remains one of the least studied in Italy.

Author Contributions: Conceptualization, A.C. and G.C; methodology, A.C., V.L. and G.C.; software, G.C.; field investigation, A.C., G.M. and G.C.; writing—original draft preparation, A.C., V.L. and G.C.; writing—review and editing, A.C. and G.C.; supervision, G.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding: This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments: The authors are grateful to the anonymous reviewers who provided useful advice, and to Prof. Adamo Domenico Rombolà and his team from Bologna University for the productive cooperation during the field work in Vibo Valentia province.

Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Photographic repertory

References

  1. Bartolucci, F.; Peruzzi, L.; Galasso, G.; Alessandrini, A.; Ardenghi, N.M.G.; Bacchetta, G.; Banfi, E.; Barberis, G.; Bernardo, L.; Bouvet, D.; Bovio, M.; Calvia, G.; Castello, M.; Cecchi, L.; Del Guacchio, E.; Domina, G.; Fascetti, S.; Gallo, L.; Gottschlich, G.; Guarino, R.; Gubellini, L.; Hofmann, N.; Iberite, M.; Jiménez-Mejías, P.; Longo, D.; Marchetti, D.; Martini, F.; Masin, R.R.; Medagli, P.; Peccenini, S.; Prosser, F.; Roma-Marzio, F.; Rosati, L.; Santangelo, A.; Scoppola, A.; Selvaggi, A.; Selvi, F.; Soldano, A.; Stinca, A.; Wagensommer, R.P.; Wilhalm T.; Conti F. A second update to the checklist of the vascular flora native to Italy, Plant Biosystems 2024, 158, 2, 219–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/11263504.2024.2320126[CrossRef]
  2. Peruzzi, L.; Conti, F.; Bartolucci, F. An inventory of vascular plants endemic to Italy. Phytotaxa 2014, 168, 1–75. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.168.1.1[CrossRef]
  3. Bertolani Marchetti, D. Dall’Appennino Calabro alle Serre Campane. Cenni paleontologici e paleoclimatici. Lavori della Società Italiana di Biogeografia 1984, 10, 67-87.[CrossRef]
  4. Blasi, C.; Capotorti, G.; Copiz, R.; Guida, D.; Mollo, B.; Smiraglia, D.; Zavattero, L. Classification and mapping of the ecoregions of Italy, Plant Biosystems 2014, 148, 6, 1255-1345. https://doi.org/10.1080/11263504.2014.985756[CrossRef]
  5. Schmitt, T.; Fritz, U.; Delfino, M.; Ulrich, J.; Habel, C. Biogeography of Italy revisited: Genetic lineages confirm major phylogeographic patterns and a pre-Pleistocene origin of its biota. Front. Zool. 2021, 18, 34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12983-021-00418-9[CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Caruso, G.; Casavecchia, S.; Biondi, E. The vascular flora of Uria basin (Catanzaro, S-Italy) and its conservation relevance. Fl. Medit. 2022a, 32, 99-116. https://doi.org/10.7320/FlMedit32.099[CrossRef]
  7. Morabito, A.; Musarella, C.M.; Caruso, G.; Spampinato, G. Biodiversity as a Tool in the Assessment of the Conservation Status of Coastal Habitats: A Case Study from Calabria (Southern Italy). Diversity 2024, 16, 535. https://doi.org/10.3390/d16090535[CrossRef]
  8. Brullo, S.; Gangale, C.; Uzunov, D. Taxonomic remarks on the endemic flora of the Sila Mountain (S Italy). Bocconea 2007, 21, 213-222.
  9. Uzunov, D.; Caruso, G.; Gangale, C. Limonium calabrum Brullo. Inf. Bot. Ital. 2010, 42, 574-575.
  10. Caruso, G.; Giardina, A.; Raimondo, F.; Spadaro, V. A new species of Centaurea (Asteraceae) from Calabria (S Italy). Plant Biosystems 2013, 147, 3, 844-848.[CrossRef]
  11. Spampinato, G.; Laface, V.L.A.; Ortiz, A.C.; Canas, R.Q.; Musarella, C.M. Salvia ceratophylloides Ard. (Lamiaceae): a rare endemic species of Calabria (southern Italy). In Endemic Species; Cano-Carmona, E.; Musarella, C.M.; Cano-Ortiz, A., Eds.; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2019. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.84905[CrossRef]
  12. Bernardo, L.; Gargano, D.; Passalacqua, N.G.; Peruzzi, L.; Spampinato, G. Carta dello stato delle conoscenze floristiche della Calabria. In Stato delle conoscenze sulla flora vascolare d’Italia; Scoppola, A.; Blasi, C., Eds.; Palombi Editori: Roma, Italy, 2005; pp. 197-201.
  13. D’Antraccoli, M.; Peruzzi, L.; Conti, F.; Galasso, G.; Roma-Marzio, F.; Bartolucci, F. Floristic Richness in a Mediterranean Hotspot: A Journey across Italy. Plants 2024, 13, 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13010012[CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Akhani, H.; Edwards, G.; Roalson, E.H. Diversification of the old world Salsoleae s.l. (Chenopodiaceae): molecular phylogenetic analysis of nuclear and chloroplast datasets and a revised classification. Int. J. Plant Sci. 2007, 168, 931–956.[CrossRef]
  15. Mosyakin, S.L.; Rilke, S.; Freitag, H. Proposal to conserve the name Salsola (Chenopodiaceae s. str.; Amaranthaceae sensu APG) with a conserved type. Taxon 2014, 63, 1134–1135.[CrossRef]
  16. Fiori, A. Nuova Flora Analitica d’Italia, contenente la descrizione delle piante vascolari indigene inselvatichite e largamente coltivate in Italia; Tipogr. di M. Ricci: Firenze, Italy, 1923-25; Vol. 1.[CrossRef]
  17. Pignatti, S. Flora d’Italia; Edagricole: Bologna, Italy, 1982; Voll. 1-3.
  18. Conti, F.; Abbate, G.; Alessandrini, A.; Blasi, C. An Annotated Checklist of the Italian Vascular Flora; Palombi Editori: Rome, Italy, 2005.
  19. Linnaeus, C. Centuria II Plantarum; Uppsala, 1756; Vol. 2.
  20. Linnaeus, C. Species Plantarum; Laurentii Salvii: Stockholm, 1753; Vol. 1.
  21. Tournefort, J.P. de. Institutiones rei herbariae; Typographia Regia: Paris, 1700; Vol. 1.[CrossRef]
  22. Linnaeus, C. Species plantarum, 2nd ed.; Laurentii Salvii: Stockholm, 1762; Vol. 2.
  23. Mosyakin, S. L. Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on Pontic-Mediterranean coastal and some Australasian taxa of Salsola (Chenopodiaceae), Ukr. Bot. J. 2017, 74, 521-531.[CrossRef]
  24. Galicia-Herbada, D. Origin and diversification of Thymelaea (Thymelaeaceae): inferences from a phylogenetic study based on ITS (rDNA) sequences. Plant Syst. Evol. 2006, 257, 159–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-005-0371-z[CrossRef]
  25. Pedrol, J. Thymelaea Mill. In Flora Iberica; Castroviejo, S.; Aedo, C.; Benedí, C.; Laínz, M.; Muñoz Garmendia, F.; Nieto Feliner, G.; Paiva, J., Eds.; Real Jardín Botánico - CSIC: Madrid, Spain, 1997; Vol. 8, pp. 42-69.
  26. Pedrol, J. Thymelaeaceae. – In: Euro+Med Plantbase - the information resource for Euro-Mediterranean plant diversity. 2011+, Published at http://www.europlusmed.org (accessed 12/02/2024).
  27. Pignatti, S. Flora d’Italia & Flora Digitale, 2nd ed.; Edagricole-Edizioni Agricole di New Business Media s.r.l.: Milano, Italy, 2017-2019; Voll. 1-4. ISBN 978-88-506-5242-6.
  28. POWO. Plants of the World Online. Facilitated by the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. 2024, Published on the Internet; http://www.plantsoftheworldonline.org/ (accessed 12/02/2024).
  29. Webb, D.A. Thymelaea Miller. In Flora Europaea; Tutin, T.G.; Heywood, V.H.; Burges, N.A.; Moore, D.M.; Valentine, D.H.; Walters, S.M.; Webb, D.A., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1968; Vol. 2.
  30. Gussone, G. Florae Siculae Prodromus; Regia Typographia: Napoli, 1827; Vol. 1.
  31. Gussone, G. Florae Siculae Synopsis; Tramater: Napoli, 1842; Vol. 1.
  32. Bertoloni, A. Flora italica; Tipografia Riccardo Masi: Bologna, 1839; Vol. 4.
  33. Cesati, V.; Passerini, G.; Gibelli, G. Compendio della flora Italiana; F. Valladi: Milano, Italy, 1868–1886.
  34. Arcangeli, G. Compendio della flora italiana ossia manuale per la determinazione delle piante che trovansi selvatiche od inselvatichite nell’Italia o nelle isole adiacenti, 2nd ed.; E. Loescher: Torino-Roma, Italy, 1894.
  35. Fiori, A.; Paoletti, G. Flora analitica d’Italia ossia descrizione delle piante vascolari indigene inselvatichite e largamente coltivate in Italia disposte per quadri analitici; Tipogr. del Seminario: Padova, Italy, 1896-1898; Vol. 1.
  36. Tan, K. Studies in the Thymelaeaceae II. A revision of the genus Thymelaea. Notes Roy. Bot. Gard. Edinburgh 1980, 38, 2, 189-246.
  37. Tison, J.; de Foucault, B. Flora Gallica: Flore de France; Biotope Editions: Mèze, France, 2014; p. 1066.
  38. Lazzeri, V.; Gestri, G.; Borzatti von Löwenstern, A.; Mannocci, M.; Barsotti, G.; Campus, G.; Caramante, P. Note floristiche tosco-sarde IV: novità regionali e locali per le regioni Toscana e Sardegna. Annali del Museo Civico di Rovereto, sezione Archeologia, Storia e Scienze Naturali 2018, 33, 79–110.
  39. Caruso, G. Calabrian Native Project: Botanical Education Applied to Conservation and Valorization of Autochthonous Woody Plants. Research Journal of Ecology and Environmental Sciences 2022b, 2, 2, 47-59. https://www.scipublications.com/journal/index.php/rjees/article/view/387[CrossRef]
  40. Thiers, B. Index Herbariorum: a global directory of Public Herbaria and Associated Staff. New York Botanical Garden’s Virtual Herbarium, 2016. http://sweetgum.nybg.org/science/ih/ (accessed 12/02/2024).
  41. QGIS. Quantum GIS 3.34 Prizren, 2024 (downloaded 12/02/2024).
  42. Microsoft Excel. Excel 2023. In: Microsoft Office. Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, 2023.
  43. Mosyakin, S.L. A taxonomic synopsis of the genus Salsola (Chenopodiaceae) in North America. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 1996, 83, 3, 387–395.[CrossRef]
  44. Rilke, S. Revision der Sektion Salsola s.l. der Gattung Salsola (Chenopodiaceae). Bibliotheca Botanica, Heft 149; Schweizerbart: Stuttgart, Germany, 1999.
  45. Portal to the Flora of Italy. Available at http://dryades.units.it/floritaly, 2024 (accessed 27/11/2024).
  46. Acta Plantarum, Scheda IPFI, Acta Plantarum. 2007-2024, Available on line: https://www.actaplantarum.org (accessed 27/11/2024).
  47. Zepner, L.; Karrasch, P.; Wiemann, F.; Bernard, L. ClimateCharts.net - an interactive climate analysis web platform, International Journal of Digital Earth 2020, 14, 3, 338-356. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2020.1829112 (accessed 24/01/2024).[CrossRef]
  48. Rivas-Martinez, S.; Rivas-Saenz, S. Worldwide Bioclimatic Classification System, 1996-2009. Phytosociological Research Center, Spain, 2009. http://www.globalbioclimatics.org
  49. Marchetti, M.P.; Burton, A.N.; Bayliss, D.D.; Chiarini, G.; Gioria, C.; Paganelli, Belvedere di Spinello (Foglio 237 - I SE), Carta Geologica della Calabria; Servizio Bonifiche - Ufficio Piani di Massima e Studi, Cassa per il Mezzogiorno: Ercolano, Napoli, 1970.
  50. Kottek, M.; Grieser, J.; Beck, C.; Rudolf, B.; Rubel, F.; World Map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification updated. Meteorologische Zeitschrift 2006, 15, 3, 259-263. https://dx.doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2006/0130[CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Marchetti, M.P.; Sargent, G.E.G.; Bayliss, D.D.; Chiarini, G.; Gioria, C.; Paganelli, F. San Gregorio d’Ippona (Foglio 246 - IV NE), Carta Geologica della Calabria; Servizio Bonifiche - Ufficio Piani di Massima e Studi, Cassa per il Mezzogiorno: Ercolano, Napoli, 1972.
  52. Marchetti, M.P.; Hughes, D.O.; Bayliss, D.D.; Chiarini, G.; Gioria, C.; Manmana, A. Crotone (Foglio 238 - III SE), Carta Geologica della Calabria; Servizio Bonifiche - Ufficio Piani di Massima e Studi, Cassa per il Mezzogiorno: Ercolano, Napoli, 1967.
  53. Savi, G. Flora Pisana; P. Giacomelli Editore, Pisa, 1798; pp. 271-273.[CrossRef]
  54. Moricand, M.E. Flora veneta; Paschoud: Paris, 1820; p. 138.
  55. Tenore, M. Flora Napolitana; Stamperia Francese: Napoli, 1824-1829; Vol. 3, pp. 262-263.
  56. Bertoloni, A. Flora italica; Tipografia Riccardo Masi: Bologna, 1837; Vol. 3.
  57. Steven, C. von. Salsola squarrosa Steven ex Moq. In Prodromus systematis naturalis regni vegetabilis; de Candolle, A., Ed.; Typ. Masson: Paris, 1849; Vol. 13., pt. 2.
  58. Moris, G.G. Flora Sardoa; Tipografia Regia: Torino, 1858-1859; Vol. 3, pp. 358-360.
  59. Caruel, T. Prodromo della Flora Toscana; Le Monnier: Firenze, 1860-64.
  60. Sommier, S. Le Isole Pelagie. Lampedusa, Linosa e Lampione e la loro flora con un elenco completo delle piante di Pantelleria; Stabilimento Pella: Florence, Italy, 1908.[CrossRef]
  61. Sommier, S. Flora dell’isola di Pantelleria; Ricci: Firenze, Italy, 1922.[CrossRef]
  62. Baroni, E. Guida Botanica D’Italia, 4th ed.; Licinio Cappelli: Bologna, Italy, 1969.
  63. Giardina, G.; Raimondo, F.M., Spadaro V. A catalogue of plants growing in Sicily. Bocconea 2007, 20, 5-582.
  64. Brullo, C.; Brullo, S.; Giusso del Galdo, G.; Guarino, R.; Iamonico, D. Il genere Salsola s.l. (Chenopodiaceae) in Italia. In Contributi alla ricerca floristica in Italia; Peccenini, S.; Domina, G., Eds.; Euroservice Punto Grafica: Palermo, Italy, 2013.
  65. Brullo, C.; Brullo, S.; Gaskin, J.F.; Giusso, G.; Hrusa, G.F.; Salmeri, C. A new species of Kali (Salsoloideae, Chenopodiaceae) from Sicily, supported by molecular analysis. Phytotaxa 2015, 201, 256–277.[CrossRef]
  66. Bartolucci, F.; Peruzzi, L.; Galasso, G.; Albano, A.; Alessandrini, A.; Ardenghi, N.M.G.; Astuti, G.; Bacchetta, G.; Ballelli, S.; Banfi, E.; Barberis, G.; Bernardo, L.; Bouvet, D.; Bovio, M.; Cecchi, L.; Di Pietro, R.; Domina, G.; Fascetti, S.; Fenu, G.; Festi, F.; Foggi, B.; Gallo, L.; Gottschlich, G.; Gubellini, L.; Iamonico, D.; Iberite, M.; Jiménez-Mejías, P.; Lattanzi, E.; Marchetti, D.; Martinetto, E.; Masin, R.R.; Medagli, P.; Passalacqua, N.G.; Peccenini, S.; Pennesi, R.; Pierini, B.; Poldini, R.; Prosser, F.; Raimondo, F.M.; Roma-Marzio, F.; Rosati, L.; Santangelo, A.; Scoppola, A.; Scortegagna, S.; Selvaggi, A.; Selvi, F.; Soldano, A.; Stinca, A.; Wagensommer, R.P.; Wilhalm, T.; Conti, F. An updated checklist of the vascular flora native to Italy, Plant Biosystems 2018, 152, 2, 179-303. https://doi.org/10.1080/11263504.2017.1419996[CrossRef]
  67. Desfontaines, R.L. Flora Atlantica sive historia plantarum quae in Atlante Agro Tunetano et Algeriensi crescent; Blanchon: Paris, 1798; Vol. 1.[CrossRef]
  68. Reichenbach, L. Flora germanica excursoria; Carolum Cnobloch: Lipsiae, 1832.
  69. Ascherson, P.; Graebner, P. Flora des nordostdeutschen Flachlandes; Gebrüder Borntraeger: Berlin, 1898-1899.
  70. Degen, A. Flora Velebitica, vol. 2; Verl. Ungar. Akad. Wissenschaft: Budapest, 1937.
  71. Clinton, G.P. Russian thistle and some plants that are mistaken for it. Illinois Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 1895, 39, 87-118.
  72. Aellen, P.; Akeroyd, J.R. Salsola L. In Flora Europaea, 2nd ed.; Tutin, T.G.; Burges, N.A.; Chater, J.R.; Edmondson, A.O.; Heywood, V.H.; Moore, D.M.; Valentine, D.H.; Walters, S.M.; Webb, D.A., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1993; Vol. 1.
  73. Bovio, M. Flora Vascolare della Valle d'Aosta; Societé de la Flore Valdôtaine, Testolin Editore: Sarre (Aosta), Italy, 2014.
  74. Lazzeri, V.; Campus, G.; Cardini, A.; Gestri, G.; Nicolella, G.; Tognazzi, F. Note floristiche tosco-sarde V: novità regionali per le regioni Toscana e Sardegna. Acta Plantarum Notes 2023, 9, 94-103.

Copyright

© 2025 by authors and Scientific Publications. This is an open access article and the related PDF distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Metrics

Citations

No citations were found for this article, but you may check on Google Scholar

If you find this article cited by other articles, please click the button to add a citation.

Article Access Statistics
Article Download Statistics
Article metrics
Views
154
Downloads
28

How to Cite

Capuano, A., Montepaone, G., Lazzeri, V., & Caruso, G. (2024). Salsola tragus L. (Amaranthaceae) and Thymelaea gussonei Boreau (Thymelaeaceae): new records for the native vascular flora of Calabria (S-Italy) with some remarks about their taxonomy and distribution. Research Journal of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 4(1), 61–79. Retrieved from https://www.scipublications.com/journal/index.php/rjees/article/view/883
  1. Bartolucci, F.; Peruzzi, L.; Galasso, G.; Alessandrini, A.; Ardenghi, N.M.G.; Bacchetta, G.; Banfi, E.; Barberis, G.; Bernardo, L.; Bouvet, D.; Bovio, M.; Calvia, G.; Castello, M.; Cecchi, L.; Del Guacchio, E.; Domina, G.; Fascetti, S.; Gallo, L.; Gottschlich, G.; Guarino, R.; Gubellini, L.; Hofmann, N.; Iberite, M.; Jiménez-Mejías, P.; Longo, D.; Marchetti, D.; Martini, F.; Masin, R.R.; Medagli, P.; Peccenini, S.; Prosser, F.; Roma-Marzio, F.; Rosati, L.; Santangelo, A.; Scoppola, A.; Selvaggi, A.; Selvi, F.; Soldano, A.; Stinca, A.; Wagensommer, R.P.; Wilhalm T.; Conti F. A second update to the checklist of the vascular flora native to Italy, Plant Biosystems 2024, 158, 2, 219–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/11263504.2024.2320126[CrossRef]
  2. Peruzzi, L.; Conti, F.; Bartolucci, F. An inventory of vascular plants endemic to Italy. Phytotaxa 2014, 168, 1–75. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.168.1.1[CrossRef]
  3. Bertolani Marchetti, D. Dall’Appennino Calabro alle Serre Campane. Cenni paleontologici e paleoclimatici. Lavori della Società Italiana di Biogeografia 1984, 10, 67-87.[CrossRef]
  4. Blasi, C.; Capotorti, G.; Copiz, R.; Guida, D.; Mollo, B.; Smiraglia, D.; Zavattero, L. Classification and mapping of the ecoregions of Italy, Plant Biosystems 2014, 148, 6, 1255-1345. https://doi.org/10.1080/11263504.2014.985756[CrossRef]
  5. Schmitt, T.; Fritz, U.; Delfino, M.; Ulrich, J.; Habel, C. Biogeography of Italy revisited: Genetic lineages confirm major phylogeographic patterns and a pre-Pleistocene origin of its biota. Front. Zool. 2021, 18, 34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12983-021-00418-9[CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Caruso, G.; Casavecchia, S.; Biondi, E. The vascular flora of Uria basin (Catanzaro, S-Italy) and its conservation relevance. Fl. Medit. 2022a, 32, 99-116. https://doi.org/10.7320/FlMedit32.099[CrossRef]
  7. Morabito, A.; Musarella, C.M.; Caruso, G.; Spampinato, G. Biodiversity as a Tool in the Assessment of the Conservation Status of Coastal Habitats: A Case Study from Calabria (Southern Italy). Diversity 2024, 16, 535. https://doi.org/10.3390/d16090535[CrossRef]
  8. Brullo, S.; Gangale, C.; Uzunov, D. Taxonomic remarks on the endemic flora of the Sila Mountain (S Italy). Bocconea 2007, 21, 213-222.
  9. Uzunov, D.; Caruso, G.; Gangale, C. Limonium calabrum Brullo. Inf. Bot. Ital. 2010, 42, 574-575.
  10. Caruso, G.; Giardina, A.; Raimondo, F.; Spadaro, V. A new species of Centaurea (Asteraceae) from Calabria (S Italy). Plant Biosystems 2013, 147, 3, 844-848.[CrossRef]
  11. Spampinato, G.; Laface, V.L.A.; Ortiz, A.C.; Canas, R.Q.; Musarella, C.M. Salvia ceratophylloides Ard. (Lamiaceae): a rare endemic species of Calabria (southern Italy). In Endemic Species; Cano-Carmona, E.; Musarella, C.M.; Cano-Ortiz, A., Eds.; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2019. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.84905[CrossRef]
  12. Bernardo, L.; Gargano, D.; Passalacqua, N.G.; Peruzzi, L.; Spampinato, G. Carta dello stato delle conoscenze floristiche della Calabria. In Stato delle conoscenze sulla flora vascolare d’Italia; Scoppola, A.; Blasi, C., Eds.; Palombi Editori: Roma, Italy, 2005; pp. 197-201.
  13. D’Antraccoli, M.; Peruzzi, L.; Conti, F.; Galasso, G.; Roma-Marzio, F.; Bartolucci, F. Floristic Richness in a Mediterranean Hotspot: A Journey across Italy. Plants 2024, 13, 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13010012[CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Akhani, H.; Edwards, G.; Roalson, E.H. Diversification of the old world Salsoleae s.l. (Chenopodiaceae): molecular phylogenetic analysis of nuclear and chloroplast datasets and a revised classification. Int. J. Plant Sci. 2007, 168, 931–956.[CrossRef]
  15. Mosyakin, S.L.; Rilke, S.; Freitag, H. Proposal to conserve the name Salsola (Chenopodiaceae s. str.; Amaranthaceae sensu APG) with a conserved type. Taxon 2014, 63, 1134–1135.[CrossRef]
  16. Fiori, A. Nuova Flora Analitica d’Italia, contenente la descrizione delle piante vascolari indigene inselvatichite e largamente coltivate in Italia; Tipogr. di M. Ricci: Firenze, Italy, 1923-25; Vol. 1.[CrossRef]
  17. Pignatti, S. Flora d’Italia; Edagricole: Bologna, Italy, 1982; Voll. 1-3.
  18. Conti, F.; Abbate, G.; Alessandrini, A.; Blasi, C. An Annotated Checklist of the Italian Vascular Flora; Palombi Editori: Rome, Italy, 2005.
  19. Linnaeus, C. Centuria II Plantarum; Uppsala, 1756; Vol. 2.
  20. Linnaeus, C. Species Plantarum; Laurentii Salvii: Stockholm, 1753; Vol. 1.
  21. Tournefort, J.P. de. Institutiones rei herbariae; Typographia Regia: Paris, 1700; Vol. 1.[CrossRef]
  22. Linnaeus, C. Species plantarum, 2nd ed.; Laurentii Salvii: Stockholm, 1762; Vol. 2.
  23. Mosyakin, S. L. Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on Pontic-Mediterranean coastal and some Australasian taxa of Salsola (Chenopodiaceae), Ukr. Bot. J. 2017, 74, 521-531.[CrossRef]
  24. Galicia-Herbada, D. Origin and diversification of Thymelaea (Thymelaeaceae): inferences from a phylogenetic study based on ITS (rDNA) sequences. Plant Syst. Evol. 2006, 257, 159–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-005-0371-z[CrossRef]
  25. Pedrol, J. Thymelaea Mill. In Flora Iberica; Castroviejo, S.; Aedo, C.; Benedí, C.; Laínz, M.; Muñoz Garmendia, F.; Nieto Feliner, G.; Paiva, J., Eds.; Real Jardín Botánico - CSIC: Madrid, Spain, 1997; Vol. 8, pp. 42-69.
  26. Pedrol, J. Thymelaeaceae. – In: Euro+Med Plantbase - the information resource for Euro-Mediterranean plant diversity. 2011+, Published at http://www.europlusmed.org (accessed 12/02/2024).
  27. Pignatti, S. Flora d’Italia & Flora Digitale, 2nd ed.; Edagricole-Edizioni Agricole di New Business Media s.r.l.: Milano, Italy, 2017-2019; Voll. 1-4. ISBN 978-88-506-5242-6.
  28. POWO. Plants of the World Online. Facilitated by the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. 2024, Published on the Internet; http://www.plantsoftheworldonline.org/ (accessed 12/02/2024).
  29. Webb, D.A. Thymelaea Miller. In Flora Europaea; Tutin, T.G.; Heywood, V.H.; Burges, N.A.; Moore, D.M.; Valentine, D.H.; Walters, S.M.; Webb, D.A., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1968; Vol. 2.
  30. Gussone, G. Florae Siculae Prodromus; Regia Typographia: Napoli, 1827; Vol. 1.
  31. Gussone, G. Florae Siculae Synopsis; Tramater: Napoli, 1842; Vol. 1.
  32. Bertoloni, A. Flora italica; Tipografia Riccardo Masi: Bologna, 1839; Vol. 4.
  33. Cesati, V.; Passerini, G.; Gibelli, G. Compendio della flora Italiana; F. Valladi: Milano, Italy, 1868–1886.
  34. Arcangeli, G. Compendio della flora italiana ossia manuale per la determinazione delle piante che trovansi selvatiche od inselvatichite nell’Italia o nelle isole adiacenti, 2nd ed.; E. Loescher: Torino-Roma, Italy, 1894.
  35. Fiori, A.; Paoletti, G. Flora analitica d’Italia ossia descrizione delle piante vascolari indigene inselvatichite e largamente coltivate in Italia disposte per quadri analitici; Tipogr. del Seminario: Padova, Italy, 1896-1898; Vol. 1.
  36. Tan, K. Studies in the Thymelaeaceae II. A revision of the genus Thymelaea. Notes Roy. Bot. Gard. Edinburgh 1980, 38, 2, 189-246.
  37. Tison, J.; de Foucault, B. Flora Gallica: Flore de France; Biotope Editions: Mèze, France, 2014; p. 1066.
  38. Lazzeri, V.; Gestri, G.; Borzatti von Löwenstern, A.; Mannocci, M.; Barsotti, G.; Campus, G.; Caramante, P. Note floristiche tosco-sarde IV: novità regionali e locali per le regioni Toscana e Sardegna. Annali del Museo Civico di Rovereto, sezione Archeologia, Storia e Scienze Naturali 2018, 33, 79–110.
  39. Caruso, G. Calabrian Native Project: Botanical Education Applied to Conservation and Valorization of Autochthonous Woody Plants. Research Journal of Ecology and Environmental Sciences 2022b, 2, 2, 47-59. https://www.scipublications.com/journal/index.php/rjees/article/view/387[CrossRef]
  40. Thiers, B. Index Herbariorum: a global directory of Public Herbaria and Associated Staff. New York Botanical Garden’s Virtual Herbarium, 2016. http://sweetgum.nybg.org/science/ih/ (accessed 12/02/2024).
  41. QGIS. Quantum GIS 3.34 Prizren, 2024 (downloaded 12/02/2024).
  42. Microsoft Excel. Excel 2023. In: Microsoft Office. Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, 2023.
  43. Mosyakin, S.L. A taxonomic synopsis of the genus Salsola (Chenopodiaceae) in North America. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 1996, 83, 3, 387–395.[CrossRef]
  44. Rilke, S. Revision der Sektion Salsola s.l. der Gattung Salsola (Chenopodiaceae). Bibliotheca Botanica, Heft 149; Schweizerbart: Stuttgart, Germany, 1999.
  45. Portal to the Flora of Italy. Available at http://dryades.units.it/floritaly, 2024 (accessed 27/11/2024).
  46. Acta Plantarum, Scheda IPFI, Acta Plantarum. 2007-2024, Available on line: https://www.actaplantarum.org (accessed 27/11/2024).
  47. Zepner, L.; Karrasch, P.; Wiemann, F.; Bernard, L. ClimateCharts.net - an interactive climate analysis web platform, International Journal of Digital Earth 2020, 14, 3, 338-356. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2020.1829112 (accessed 24/01/2024).[CrossRef]
  48. Rivas-Martinez, S.; Rivas-Saenz, S. Worldwide Bioclimatic Classification System, 1996-2009. Phytosociological Research Center, Spain, 2009. http://www.globalbioclimatics.org
  49. Marchetti, M.P.; Burton, A.N.; Bayliss, D.D.; Chiarini, G.; Gioria, C.; Paganelli, Belvedere di Spinello (Foglio 237 - I SE), Carta Geologica della Calabria; Servizio Bonifiche - Ufficio Piani di Massima e Studi, Cassa per il Mezzogiorno: Ercolano, Napoli, 1970.
  50. Kottek, M.; Grieser, J.; Beck, C.; Rudolf, B.; Rubel, F.; World Map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification updated. Meteorologische Zeitschrift 2006, 15, 3, 259-263. https://dx.doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2006/0130[CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Marchetti, M.P.; Sargent, G.E.G.; Bayliss, D.D.; Chiarini, G.; Gioria, C.; Paganelli, F. San Gregorio d’Ippona (Foglio 246 - IV NE), Carta Geologica della Calabria; Servizio Bonifiche - Ufficio Piani di Massima e Studi, Cassa per il Mezzogiorno: Ercolano, Napoli, 1972.
  52. Marchetti, M.P.; Hughes, D.O.; Bayliss, D.D.; Chiarini, G.; Gioria, C.; Manmana, A. Crotone (Foglio 238 - III SE), Carta Geologica della Calabria; Servizio Bonifiche - Ufficio Piani di Massima e Studi, Cassa per il Mezzogiorno: Ercolano, Napoli, 1967.
  53. Savi, G. Flora Pisana; P. Giacomelli Editore, Pisa, 1798; pp. 271-273.[CrossRef]
  54. Moricand, M.E. Flora veneta; Paschoud: Paris, 1820; p. 138.
  55. Tenore, M. Flora Napolitana; Stamperia Francese: Napoli, 1824-1829; Vol. 3, pp. 262-263.
  56. Bertoloni, A. Flora italica; Tipografia Riccardo Masi: Bologna, 1837; Vol. 3.
  57. Steven, C. von. Salsola squarrosa Steven ex Moq. In Prodromus systematis naturalis regni vegetabilis; de Candolle, A., Ed.; Typ. Masson: Paris, 1849; Vol. 13., pt. 2.
  58. Moris, G.G. Flora Sardoa; Tipografia Regia: Torino, 1858-1859; Vol. 3, pp. 358-360.
  59. Caruel, T. Prodromo della Flora Toscana; Le Monnier: Firenze, 1860-64.
  60. Sommier, S. Le Isole Pelagie. Lampedusa, Linosa e Lampione e la loro flora con un elenco completo delle piante di Pantelleria; Stabilimento Pella: Florence, Italy, 1908.[CrossRef]
  61. Sommier, S. Flora dell’isola di Pantelleria; Ricci: Firenze, Italy, 1922.[CrossRef]
  62. Baroni, E. Guida Botanica D’Italia, 4th ed.; Licinio Cappelli: Bologna, Italy, 1969.
  63. Giardina, G.; Raimondo, F.M., Spadaro V. A catalogue of plants growing in Sicily. Bocconea 2007, 20, 5-582.
  64. Brullo, C.; Brullo, S.; Giusso del Galdo, G.; Guarino, R.; Iamonico, D. Il genere Salsola s.l. (Chenopodiaceae) in Italia. In Contributi alla ricerca floristica in Italia; Peccenini, S.; Domina, G., Eds.; Euroservice Punto Grafica: Palermo, Italy, 2013.
  65. Brullo, C.; Brullo, S.; Gaskin, J.F.; Giusso, G.; Hrusa, G.F.; Salmeri, C. A new species of Kali (Salsoloideae, Chenopodiaceae) from Sicily, supported by molecular analysis. Phytotaxa 2015, 201, 256–277.[CrossRef]
  66. Bartolucci, F.; Peruzzi, L.; Galasso, G.; Albano, A.; Alessandrini, A.; Ardenghi, N.M.G.; Astuti, G.; Bacchetta, G.; Ballelli, S.; Banfi, E.; Barberis, G.; Bernardo, L.; Bouvet, D.; Bovio, M.; Cecchi, L.; Di Pietro, R.; Domina, G.; Fascetti, S.; Fenu, G.; Festi, F.; Foggi, B.; Gallo, L.; Gottschlich, G.; Gubellini, L.; Iamonico, D.; Iberite, M.; Jiménez-Mejías, P.; Lattanzi, E.; Marchetti, D.; Martinetto, E.; Masin, R.R.; Medagli, P.; Passalacqua, N.G.; Peccenini, S.; Pennesi, R.; Pierini, B.; Poldini, R.; Prosser, F.; Raimondo, F.M.; Roma-Marzio, F.; Rosati, L.; Santangelo, A.; Scoppola, A.; Scortegagna, S.; Selvaggi, A.; Selvi, F.; Soldano, A.; Stinca, A.; Wagensommer, R.P.; Wilhalm, T.; Conti, F. An updated checklist of the vascular flora native to Italy, Plant Biosystems 2018, 152, 2, 179-303. https://doi.org/10.1080/11263504.2017.1419996[CrossRef]
  67. Desfontaines, R.L. Flora Atlantica sive historia plantarum quae in Atlante Agro Tunetano et Algeriensi crescent; Blanchon: Paris, 1798; Vol. 1.[CrossRef]
  68. Reichenbach, L. Flora germanica excursoria; Carolum Cnobloch: Lipsiae, 1832.
  69. Ascherson, P.; Graebner, P. Flora des nordostdeutschen Flachlandes; Gebrüder Borntraeger: Berlin, 1898-1899.
  70. Degen, A. Flora Velebitica, vol. 2; Verl. Ungar. Akad. Wissenschaft: Budapest, 1937.
  71. Clinton, G.P. Russian thistle and some plants that are mistaken for it. Illinois Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 1895, 39, 87-118.
  72. Aellen, P.; Akeroyd, J.R. Salsola L. In Flora Europaea, 2nd ed.; Tutin, T.G.; Burges, N.A.; Chater, J.R.; Edmondson, A.O.; Heywood, V.H.; Moore, D.M.; Valentine, D.H.; Walters, S.M.; Webb, D.A., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1993; Vol. 1.
  73. Bovio, M. Flora Vascolare della Valle d'Aosta; Societé de la Flore Valdôtaine, Testolin Editore: Sarre (Aosta), Italy, 2014.
  74. Lazzeri, V.; Campus, G.; Cardini, A.; Gestri, G.; Nicolella, G.; Tognazzi, F. Note floristiche tosco-sarde V: novità regionali per le regioni Toscana e Sardegna. Acta Plantarum Notes 2023, 9, 94-103.

Citations of