Filter options

Publication Date
From
to
Subjects
Journals
Article Types
Countries / Territories
Open Access August 03, 2025

Comparison of Rates of Air Leakage Due to Differences in Face Shape and Mask Size

Abstract Effective infection control requires a close fit between the mask and face to minimize gaps. This study investigated whether surgical mask performance varies with face shape and mask size. Three facial models were 3D-printed using head-related transfer function data. Two mask sizes were tested on each model, and 3D measurements were taken at five facial points: the nose, cheeks, and chin to assess [...] Read more.
Effective infection control requires a close fit between the mask and face to minimize gaps. This study investigated whether surgical mask performance varies with face shape and mask size. Three facial models were 3D-printed using head-related transfer function data. Two mask sizes were tested on each model, and 3D measurements were taken at five facial points: the nose, cheeks, and chin to assess mask-to-face gaps. To simulate droplet emission, an aqueous sodium chloride solution was released from a pseudo-oral cavity in the models, and air leakage was measured using a mask-fitting tester. A two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to examine the effects of face and mask size on leakage. Small face models showed significantly higher leakage than medium and large ones (p < 0.001), and S-sized masks leaked more than M-sized masks regardless of face size (p = 0.038). Linear regression showed a positive correlation between chin gaps and leakage when using S-sized masks (p < 0.05). These results suggest that medium-sized masks offer better overall performance. However, for small faces, fit—especially at the chin, requires particular attention.
Figures
PreviousNext
Article

Query parameters

Keyword:  Takashi Shigeno

View options

Citations of

Views of

Downloads of