Back to Article
Comparison of Rates of Air Leakage Due to Differences in Face Shape and Mask Size
World Journal of Nursing Research
| Vol 4, Issue 1
Table 4. Comparison of airleakage rate (%) for different combinations of facial shape and mask size
| □ | n | □ | Average | □ | SE | □ | P-value | □ | Multiple Comparisons |
| Small face _S-size mask(a) | 90 | □ | 34.5 | □ | 3.6 | □ | □ | (a)>(b)*** | |
| Small face _M-size mask(b) | 100 | □ | 16.1 | □ | 1.6 | □ | □ | (a)>(c)*** | |
| Medium face _S-size mask(c) | 38 | □ | 10.3 | □ | 1.6 | □ | <0.001*** | □ | (a)>(d)*** |
| Medium face _M-size mask(d) | 50 | □ | 17.1 | □ | 2.3 | □ | □ | (a)>(e) *** | |
| Large face _S-size mask(e) | 50 | □ | 15.5 | □ | 1.9 | □ | □ | (a)>(f)*** | |
| Large face _M-size mask(f) | 50 | □ | 12.6 | □ | 1.8 | □ | □ | □ |
SE: Standard Error; One-Way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA); ***：p<0.001