Back to Article
Spatial Mismatches between Cyclone Exposure and Food System Impacts in Vanuatu: Integrating Topographic, Agro-Ecological, and Infrastructure Mediators for Resilience Planning
Universal Journal of Food Security
| Vol 3, Issue 1
Table 2. Provincial humanitarian distribution performance followingcyclone Pam (2015)
| Province | Median time to reach 50% of affected households (days) | Households reached within 10 days (%) | Households reached within 21 days (%) | Coefficient of variation (coverage inequality) |
| Torba | 18.3 | 52 | 73 | 0.67 |
| Sanma | 10.5 | 70 | 90 | 0.45 |
| Penama | 9.4 | 68 | 87 | 0.41 |
| Malampa | 8.7 | 72 | 91 | 0.38 |
| Shefa | 6.2 | 89 | 97 | 0.31 |
| Tafea | 11.8 | 62 | 84 | 0.49 |
Sources: Post-Disaster Needs Assessment (PDNA, 2015); Food Security and Agriculture Cluster (FSAC) rapid assessments; National Disaster Management Office (NDMO) situation reports. The coefficient of variation measures within-province inequality in humanitarian coverage across affected area councils; higher values indicate greater spatial disparity in aid delivery. Data reflect post-Cyclone Pam (2015) response operations as the most comprehensively documented event in the study period.