Articles

Background: Adjacent segment disease (ASD) is a well‑recognised long‑term complication of lumbar spinal fusion, with the L5/S1 segment being particularly vulnerable when fusion terminates at L5. Data from resource‑constrained Nigerian centres on the incidence, features, and outcomes of L5/S1 ASD are scarce. This study evaluated the specific features, outcomes, and predictors of L5/S1 ASD following lumbar spine surgery at a Nigerian tertiary centre. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of 311 patients who underwent lumbar spine surgery with fixation terminating at L5 at the National Orthopaedic Hospital Dala, Kano, from January 2019 to June 2025 was conducted. Sixty‑three patients (20.3%) developed ASD over a minimum 1‑year follow‑up. Outcomes assessed included specific ASD features, management strategy (surgical vs conservative), patient satisfaction, and predictors of ASD and satisfaction. Results: The most common ASD features were disc degeneration (82.5%), facet joint arthropathy (68.3%), spinal stenosis (55.6%), and spondylolisthesis (36.5%). Twenty‑eight patients (44.4%) underwent surgical extension to S1, with 3 (4.8%) requiring additional S2AI screw fixation. The remaining 35 patients (55.6%) were managed conservatively. Surgical patients had significantly better pain relief (VAS 2.8±1.4 vs 4.6±1.8, p<0.001) and functional outcomes (ODI 28.4±12.6 vs 42.6±15.2, p<0.001). Patient satisfaction was reported by 48 patients (76.2%), with surgical management (OR 3.2, 95% CI: 1.4–7.3) and shorter symptom duration (OR 2.6, 95% CI: 1.1–6.1) being independent predictors of satisfaction. Predictors of ASD included: fusion length ≥3 levels (OR 3.4, 95% CI: 1.6–7.2), preoperative disc degeneration at L5/S1 (OR 2.8, 95% CI: 1.3–6.1), and age >55 years (OR 2.4, 95% CI: 1.1–5.2). Conclusions: L5/S1 ASD occurs in 20.3% of patients following lumbar fusion terminating at L5. Surgical extension to S1 with or without S2AI screws provides superior outcomes compared with conservative management. Fusion length, preoperative L5/S1 degeneration, and older age are significant predictors of ASD.

Background: Tobacco use remains disproportionately high among low-income and racial-ethnic minority populations. The CEASE program, with its self-help, hybrid/online, and in-person modalities, has demonstrated efficacy in promoting tobacco cessation. However, predictors of successful cessation among participants in these groups remain unclear. Objective: To identify baseline predictors of successful tobacco cessation among low-income and racial-ethnic minority participants in the CEASE program, with a focus on demographic, socioeconomic, behavioral, and psychosocial factors. Methods: Participants were allocated into three intervention arms: self-help, CEASE hybrid/online, and CEASE in-person. Baseline characteristics, including demographics (e.g., age, gender), socioeconomic status (e.g., education, employment), substance use profiles (e.g., cigarette packs per week, use of other tobacco products, menthol tobacco use), physical health (e.g., general health, number of cardiometabolic risk conditions), mental health (e.g., depressive symptoms, perceived stress), perceived social support, and nicotine dependence, were analyzed as potential predictors of cessation success. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with successful quitting, controlling for the study arm. Results: In addition to the study arm, gender, baseline depression, cardiometabolic conditions, tobacco flavor, and the use of other tobacco products were significant predictors of quit success. Individuals receiving in-person interventions had significantly higher odds of quitting (AOR = 3.79, p < 0.05). Women were significantly less likely to quit compared to men (AOR = 0.24, p < 0.01). Participants with a greater number of cardiometabolic risk conditions were more likely to quit (AOR = 1.93, p < 0.05), while those with higher levels of depression had lower odds of quitting (AOR = 0.61, p < 0.05). Menthol tobacco users were also less likely to quit (AOR = 0.10, p < 0.05). Interestingly, individuals who used other forms of tobacco in addition to cigarettes had increased odds of quitting (AOR = 2.86, p < 0.05). No other factors, including demographic variables (e.g., age), socioeconomic status (e.g., education, marital status), substance use profiles (e.g., cigarette packs per week, NRT use), or nicotine dependence, were significant predictors of cessation success. Conclusion: Baseline self-reported anxiety/depression and depressive symptoms play a critical role in reducing the likelihood of successful tobacco cessation among low-income and racial-ethnic minority participants in the CEASE program. These findings underscore the importance of addressing mental health challenges as part of tobacco cessation interventions to enhance their efficacy. Future research should explore targeted strategies for integrating mental health support into cessation programs to improve outcomes for underserved populations.

Objective: This study investigates the pathways linking socioeconomic status (SES), trauma, early puberty, and tobacco use, with a focus on how these relationships differ by sex. Using data from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study, we explore how SES and race contribute to trauma exposure, which in turn may influence early puberty and tobacco use. The study also examines potential mediating effects of trauma and early puberty on the association between SES and tobacco use, while comparing these pathways for males and females. Methods: Data were drawn from the ABCD study, and structural equation modeling (SEM) was employed to test direct and indirect pathways between SES, trauma, early puberty, and tobacco use. The sample was stratified by sex to assess differences in these relationships for males and females. Key predictors included SES, race, and age, while outcomes were trauma, early puberty, and tobacco use. The model assessed mediating effects of trauma and early puberty on tobacco use. Results: Trauma was a significant predictor of early puberty for females (B = 0.032, SE = 0.015, p = 0.039) but not males. Early puberty was significantly linked to tobacco use for females (B = 0.048, SE = 0.015, p = 0.001) but not for males. Additionally, trauma had an effect on tobacco use among females (B = 0.048, SE = 0.014, p < 0.001) but not males. Lower SES was significantly associated with higher trauma exposure for both males (B = -0.109, SE = 0.014, p < 0.001) and females (B = -0.110, SE = 0.015, p < 0.001). Conclusions: The findings suggest that trauma and early puberty play more significant roles in the pathways from SES to tobacco use for females than for males. While trauma and early puberty are crucial mediators for females, these factors are less predictive for males. These results highlight the importance of sex-specific interventions targeting trauma and early puberty as pathways to early tobacco use.

Background: The dual use of e-cigarettes and combustible cigarettes poses significant public health concerns due to the compounded risks associated with the use of both products. Understanding the predictors of dual use can inform targeted interventions and tobacco control strategies aimed at reducing nicotine dependence and health risks among adults. Objective: This study aims to identify the sociodemographic predictors of dual use of e-cigarettes and combustible cigarettes among U.S. adults using baseline data from the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study. Methods: We analyzed baseline data from the PATH Study, focusing on adult participants who reported the use of both e-cigarettes and combustible cigarettes. Logistic regression models were used to identify the associations between dual use and key sociodemographic variables, including age, gender, race/ethnicity, and education level. Results: The analysis revealed that dual use of e-cigarettes and combustible cigarettes was predominantly observed among young, female, non-Latino, White, and highly educated adults. Younger adults were more likely to engage in dual use compared to older age groups. Females showed higher rates of dual use compared to males. Non-Latino White individuals were more likely to be dual users than individuals from other racial/ethnic backgrounds. Additionally, higher educational attainment was associated with increased dual use, contrary to traditional smoking patterns. Conclusion: The findings highlight specific demographic groups that are at higher risk of dual use of e-cigarettes and combustible cigarettes, particularly younger, highly educated, non-Latino White females. These insights suggest the need for tailored public health interventions that address the unique needs and behaviors of these populations. Future research should explore the underlying motivations and contextual factors contributing to dual use to enhance the effectiveness of tobacco control policies and cessation programs.

The Gambia uses the Primary Health Care model with no trauma response system. Trauma patients are transferred through multiple levels of health care facilities before definitive care hospitals. This study was conducted to identify predictors of injury factors associated with transfer. In this study, we examined characteristics of transferred patients compared to those directly admitted in definitive care hospitals. The study was conducted in two major trauma hospitals in The Gambia. 251 road traffic injury (RTI) patients were either transferred (84%) from lower-level health centers or directly admitted (16%) to one of the study hospitals. Transferred patients were more likely to have been pedestrian/bicyclists (aOR = 1.81; 95% CI = 0.86 – 3.80). Administration of antibiotics was significantly associated with direct admit than transferred patients (aOR = 6.84; 95% CI = 2.38 – 19.68). Transferred patients were more likely to receive intravenous fluid compared to direct admits (aOR = 0.03; 95% CI = 0.01 – 0.08). The study results have implications for policies and planning in the healthcare setting in The Gambia and other LMICs with similar settings. Based on the findings of this study, it is essential that hospital management teams adapt to increasing reliance of RTI patients on lower-level healthcare facilities. The study results suggest increased burden on lower-level health care facilities. Efforts and resources should focus more on supporting lower-level facilities.