Floristic Composition and Structure in the Undergrowth of Agroforests in Neems in the Far North Region (Cameroon)
Table 6. Relative dominance (DoRe), relativedensity (DeRe), relative frequency (FeRe), importance value index (IVI) of the mostrepresentative genera in neems.
| Subdivisions | Genera | DoRe% | DeRe% | FeRe% | IVI% |
| Acacia | 2,63 | 3,79 | 3,79 | 10,21 | |
| Anacardium | 9,89 | 1,63 | 1,63 | 13,15 | |
| Annona | 0,36 | 10,19 | 10,19 | 20,75 | |
| Mayo-danay | Combretum | 0,84 | 12,81 | 12,81 | 26,45 |
| Faidherbia | 14,63 | 3,66 | 3,66 | 21,94 | |
| Guiera | 1,00 | 32,50 | 32,50 | 66,00 | |
| Hexalobus | 0,42 | 7,98 | 7,98 | 16,38 | |
| Piliostigma | 0,97 | 18,69 | 18,69 | 38,35 | |
| Sterculia | 8,62 | 0,72 | 0,72 | 10,07 | |
| Acacia | 8,42 | 16,93 | 16,93 | 42,27 | |
| Balanites | 12,00 | 2,35 | 2,35 | 16,69 | |
| Combretum | 0,80 | 11,37 | 11,37 | 23,54 | |
| Diamaré | Faidherbia | 7,27 | 2,49 | 2,49 | 12,24 |
| Hexalobus | 2,34 | 3,83 | 3,83 | 10,00 | |
| Piliostigma | 0,82 | 7,94 | 7,94 | 16,69 | |
| Ziziphus | 1,72 | 6,20 | 6,20 | 14,11 | |
| Anacardium | 4,79 | 0,19 | 0,19 | 5,18 | |
| Annona | 0,75 | 9,50 | 9,50 | 19,75 | |
| Anogeissus | 0,74 | 4,97 | 4,97 | 10,68 | |
| Mayo-kani | Combretum | 2,65 | 22,92 | 22,92 | 48,49 |
| Guiera | 0,80 | 15,25 | 15,25 | 31,31 | |
| Hexalobus | 2,87 | 15,19 | 15,19 | 33,25 | |
| Piliostigma | 0,93 | 4,99 | 4,99 | 10,91 | |
| Acacia | 28,43 | 80,68 | 80,68 | 101,79 | |
| Balanites | 13,79 | 4,66 | 4,66 | 23,11 | |
| Mayo-tsanaga | Faidherbia | 20,87 | 7,74 | 7,74 | 36,34 |
| Piliostigma | 0,61 | 5,46 | 5,46 | 11,52 | |
| Tamarindus | 5,02 | 2,33 | 2,33 | 9,67 | |
| Ziziphus | 2,99 | 15,27 | 15,27 | 33,53 |