Background: Recently specific interactions and crosslinks between the gut microbiota and the lungs have been recognized, particularly with regard to respiratory immune and anti-microbial reactions. This is often known as the “gut-lung axis” or “a common mucosal immunological system”. Objective: The aim of the current systematic review was to evaluate evidence, from published clinical trials and cohort studies, if probiotics may have an effect in improving and managing COVID-19 symptoms. Materials and methods: The available studies were searched through a comprehensive search of electronic databases that included PubMed, Science Direct, Scirus, ISI Web of Knowledge, Google Scholar and CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), using a combination of the following keywords: “COVID-19" OR "SARS-CoV-2" AND "Microbiota" OR "Probiotics” OR “Gut Lung Axis”. The literature was reviewed until August 31, 2022. Results: Only 3 studies were included. One of them evaluated the efficacy of probiotics in COVID-19 patients to obtain complete remission of all signs and symptoms. The clinical trial proves that probiotics have a significant effect on complete remission of all signs and symptoms of COVID-19 patients with statistical significant difference. Only one clinical trial out of the 3 included studies had evaluated the need for O2 therapy during the study between the probiotics and control groups, but without statistical significant difference. No statistical significant difference between the probiotics group and placebo group was observed regarding fatal prognosis during the only clinical trial that measured death as an outcome. Conclusion: We couldn’t judge on these results as they are insufficient data for pooling and meta-analysis. However, what we can say is “Most probably Probiotics have no role in treatment of COVID-19 infection”.

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a newly emerging human disease caused by a novel coronavirus, causing a global pandemic crisis. Probiotics and/or colchicine may be considered as options for treatment since they have anti-viral, anti-inflammatory, and immunomodulatory effects. The aim of the current review was to assess the effectiveness of probiotic supplements and colchicine on symptoms, duration, and progression of mild and moderate cases of COVID-19 infection. Review: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in the United States with 182 participants who were randomly assigned to receive daily oral probiotic (Lactobacillus rhamnosus) LGG or placebo for 28 days. The study indicated that LGG is well-tolerated and is associated with a delay in the onset of COVID-19 infection, a reduction in the incidence of symptoms, and alterations in the structure of the gut microbiome when administered as post-exposure prophylaxis within seven days of exposure. Colchicine may lessen mortality and the need for mechanical ventilation in mild-to-moderate COVID-19 patients, according to a systematic review and meta-analysis. Conclusion: Probiotics and/or colchicine may be viable treatment options for COVID-19 patients. To examine the efficacy of probiotics and colchicine in the treatment of COVID-19, it is necessary to conduct additional clinical trials and provide clinicians with evidence, as there are currently insufficient studies to support this conclusion.

Objectives: There remains no consensus management for isolated distal deep vein thrombosis (IDDVT), with current data inconclusive and dating back to the warfarin era. In the current direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) era, optimal management of IDDVT needs to be re-assessed. Methods: A retrospective evaluation of patients treated with therapeutic anticoagulation for IDDVT in the DOAC era (2013-2016) was compared with historically published data from the warfarin era (2011-2012). Results: 247 patients were evaluated, 103 from the DOAC era and 122 from the warfarin era. There were less provoked events in the DOAC cohort (45.6% vs 66.7%, p=<0.01). Overall rate of major bleeding was 1.6% with 1.0% in the DOAC era and 2.1% in the warfarin era (p=0.50). There was no difference in rates of VTE progression on treatment 5.8% vs 4.9% respectively (p=0.91). Overall risk of VTE recurrence post cessation was 5.3% (1.86 per 100 person years) with no difference between groups (5.8% vs 4.9%, p=0.74). Conclusions: Our data shows IDDVT is not always benign, with risk of extension despite treatment and long-term risk of VTE-recurrence. Therapeutic anticoagulation with DOAC in these patients was associated with a major bleeding rate of 1.0% in the DOAC cohort. Further clinical trials into the optimal IDDVT management in the DOAC era are necessary.

Early-onset neurodegenerative diseases (EO-NDs), such as early-onset Alzheimer’s disease (EOAD), Parkinson’s disease (EOPD), and familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (fALS), often stem from monogenic causes and manifest before typical age thresholds. These disorders frequently feature disrupted mitochondrial function and heightened oxidative stress, which together accelerate neuronal damage and degeneration. In this work, the author performs a comprehensive analysis of the literature and data related to mitochondrial dysfunction and redox imbalance in EO-NDs. Bibliometric trends were assessed using R-based tools on PubMed datasets, highlighting keyword networks and publication surges in recent years. Publicly available RNA-seq datasets from GEO and SRA were examined, with example DESeq2 analysis illustrating altered mitochondrial gene expression in EO-ND patient-derived samples. Network modeling of redox pathways using Python’s networkx demonstrates how oxidative stress can propagate through metabolic networks. Together, these computational approaches reinforce that mitochondrial DNA mutations, impaired electron transport chain (ETC) function, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation play central roles in EO-ND pathogenesis. The discussion further evaluates why antioxidant clinical trials have largely failed and how emerging therapies such as gene replacement, antisense oligonucleotides, and mitochondrial biogenesis modulators may provide more effective interventions.