Background: Maternity leave, whether paid or unpaid, is a critical resource that can significantly impact maternal well-being and newborn outcomes. However, its availability and utilization among mothers living in poverty remain understudied. Education is widely recognized as a key factor that increases access to both paid and unpaid leave. However, the theory of Minorities’ Diminished Returns (MDRs) posits that structural racism, segregation, and labor market discrimination limit the benefits of socioeconomic resources, such as education, for Black and Latino individuals. This suggests that the effects of education on maternity leave may not be uniform across racial and ethnic groups. Objective: This study aimed to examine the MDRs of education on access to unpaid and paid maternity leave among Black and Latino mothers compared to White mothers giving birth while living in poverty. Methods: We utilized baseline data from the Baby’s First Years Study (BFY), a longitudinal investigation of the effects of poverty on child development. The sample consisted of 1,050 mothers living in poverty who had recently given birth. Maternity leave (paid and unpaid) was assessed via self-report, and educational attainment was measured in years of schooling. Structural equation modeling (SEM) and interaction terms were employed to analyze racial and ethnic differences in the relationship between education and access to maternity leave. Results: Educational attainment was positively associated with access to unpaid maternity leave for the overall sample of mothers giving birth in poverty, but this association was weaker for Black and Latino mothers compared to non-Latino White mothers. Education did not significantly increase the likelihood of paid maternity leave, and there were no group differences for this association. Conclusion: This study highlights the urgent needs to address structural racism, labor market discrimination, and residential segregation that diminish the impact of education on living conditions for Black and Latino mothers, compared to non-Latino White mothers, even for those living under poverty. Policymakers and practitioners should develop targeted interventions to reduce racial and ethnic disparities in access to paid and unpaid maternity leave and other critical resources, particularly for new mothers living in poverty. Addressing these inequities is essential for improving maternal and newborn health outcomes and promoting social justice.

The concept of maternity care satisfaction focuses on women's expectations and results in women having a positive attitude about the care received during pregnancy, childbirth and after birth. The proportion of births to Ghanaian migrant mothers in China is increasing, and there is an increasing demand for information regarding their reproductive health. To reduce maternal and neonatal morbidity and death rates, it is crucial for foreign women who use maternity services to be satisfied with their care. Ghanaian women's birth experiences in China might be harmed by language and cultural disparities. Little is known about their experiences in China's homogeneous society. A survey of 317 postnatal Ghanaian foreigners in Zhenjiang, China provided the study's data and was analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics 25. The results showed that (76%) of postnatal foreigners were satisfied with delivery care. Though the satisfaction level was high, respondents raised the issues of poor communication (62.8%) and high cost of delivery care (52.4%) as some of the general experiences they faced. Healthcare providers’ strengthening routine monitoring of maternal and newborn health programs will help deliver more woman-centered care.

The study is a follow-up of the study "Coronavirus in pregnant patients and their clinical outcomes – results of a case-control study" conducted by R.Kadriu et al (2023) in which,in addition to the pregnant patients whose outcome is now being investigated,a control group of patients who were not pregnant,conducted with pregnant patients and a control group that were non-pregnant patients.This study was conducted 6 months after the discharge of the patients and their newborns,and highlights the impact of COVID-19 on their health as well as the health of the newborns. The aim of the study is to follow up the patients after 6 months of their hospitalization as COVID-19 patients and after their delivery.In the COVID study, none of the health indicators showed statistically significant differences between the population before and after hospitalization.Patient data were collected at the case level summarized in their respective groups.For secondary objectives, several comparative analyzes were performed regarding comorbidity-related parameters and available risk factors.A significance level (α) of 0.05 was used for statistical significance. While these results may be reassuring regarding the stability of health status, one should be aware of the limitations of the study, including sample size and specific population characteristics.

Background: Family planning (FP) methods have been found as an efficient approach of reducing fertility and are therefore widely supported in order to decrease population growth, particularly in poor nations. Promoting contraception availability among women (15 – 49) age has also been shown to be an efficient public health strategy for improving maternal and newborn health outcomes. This paper aimed at exploring the pooled prevalence of contraceptive uptake and its contextual determinants among women of childbearing age in The Gambia. Methods: The Gambia Demographic and Health Survey (GDHS) in both 2013 and 2019-20 was used for this study. Data were obtained from a pooled 22,098 women aged 15-49 (10,233 for 2013 and 11,865 for 2019-20) through a stratified two-stage cluster sampling approach. Percentages and chi-square tests were used and variables with p-value <0.05 were included into the model. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to assess the predictors of contraceptive usage at 95% confidence interval (CIs) with computed adjusted odds ratios (aORs). All the study data were analyzed using Stata version 15. Results: The weighted pooled prevalence of modern contraceptive utilization in The Gambia was 10.1%. Younger age, compared with women aged 25-29; 30-34; 35-39; 40-44; primary education (aOR=1.25, 95% CI=1.05-1.49); secondary education (aOR=1.57, 95% CI= 1.32-1.85); Higher education (aOR=1.90, 95% CI=1.34-12.69); living in urban areas (aOR=1.49, 95% CI= 1.25-1.79); parity 2-4 (aOR=1.21, 95% CI= 1.01-1.47); told about FP at health facility (aOR=2.97, 95% CI= 2.61-3.38), and no desire for many children (aOR=1.96, 95% CI= 1.62-2.37) were more like to use modern contraceptives among Gambian women. Conclusion: The programme certainly needs to consider improvements in the quality of care being offered to acceptors. Government agencies should target these programs and campaigns on regional FP demands and provide suitable culturally sensitive and regionally adaptive services to the communities' contexts. The programme should intensify its efforts in rural and urban settings to improve accessibility to and availability of FP services.