Back to Article

Pooled prevalence and contextual determinants of contraceptive utilization among reproductive-age women in The Gambia: Evidence from 2013 – 2020 Demographic Health Surveys

Current Research in Public Health | Vol 2, Issue 1

Table 1. Definition of independent variables used inthe analysis

Variable

Definition and coding

Age group of respondents

1=15-19; 2=20-24; 3=25-29; 4=30-34; 5=40-44; 6=45-49

Region

1=Banjul; 2=Kanifing; 3=Brikama; 4=Mansakonko; 5=Kerewan; 6=Kuntar; 7=Janjanbureh; 8=Basse

Type of place of residence

1= Urban; 2=Rural

Level of Education

0=No Education; 1=Primary; 2=Secondary; 3=Higher

Religion

1=Islam; 2=Christianity; 3=Others

Ethnicity

1=Mandinka/Jahanka; 2=Wolof; 3=Jola/Karoninka; 4=Fula/Tukulur/Lorobo; 5=Sarere; 6=Sarahule; 7=Creole/Aku; 8=Marabout; 9=Manjago; 10=Bambara; 96=Other; 97=Non-Gambian

Marital Status

0=Not currently married; 1=Currently married/living with partner

Household head

1= Male; 2=Female

Wealth index

1=Poorest; 2=Poorer; 3=Middle; 4=Richer; 5=Richest

Heard family planning on radio last few months

0=No; 1=Yes

Heard family planning on TV last few months

0=No; 1=Yes

Heard family planning in newspaper/magazine last few months

0=No; 1=Yes

At health facility, told of family planning

0=No; 1=Yes

Insurance

0=No; 1=Yes

Sexual debut

1=<18; 2=18-24; 25>

Parity

0=0; 1=1-2;2=3-4; 3=5>

Future plans to have a child

More children; undecided; No more children

Women’s autonomy in decision making concerning FP

Respondent alone; Husband/partner alone; Joint decision Other

Work Status

0=Not working; 1=Working

Place of delivery

1=Home; 2=Government facility; 3=Private facility; 4=Others

Utilization of family planning services

0=No method; 1=Traditional method; 2=Modern method