Back to Article
Weaker Effects of Parental Education on Oral Nicotine Use of High School Students in Rural Areas: Marginalization-Related Diminished Returns
Open Journal of Educational Research
| Vol 5, Issue 2
Table 3. Results of Multi-Group (Stratified byRurality) Structural Equation Model
| B | SE | 95% | CI | p | |
| Urban/Suburban | |||||
| Age (>18) | 0.19 | 0.03 | 0.14 | 0.25 | < 0.001 |
| Sex (Male) | 0.23 | 0.03 | 0.17 | 0.29 | < 0.001 |
| Two Parents in the Household | 0.18 | 0.03 | 0.11 | 0.24 | < 0.001 |
| SES (Max Parental Education; 1-6) | 0.28 | 0.03 | 0.23 | 0.33 | < 0.001 |
| Rural | |||||
| Age (>18) | 0.22 | 0.05 | 0.12 | 0.31 | < 0.001 |
| Sex (Male) | 0.24 | 0.06 | 0.13 | 0.36 | < 0.001 |
| Two Parents in the Household | 0.12 | 0.06 | 0.00 | 0.24 | < 0.001 |
| SES (Max Parental Education; 1-6) | 0.18 | 0.04 | 0.09 | 0.27 | < 0.001 |
Note: Outcome: Adolescents’ Frequency of Use of Nicotine Pouch/Gummy/Candy