This paper shows how Big Data Analytics (BDA) and Artificial Intelligence (AI) automation facilitate regulatory compliance in Finance. Regulatory compliance is essential in helping institutions to mitigate reputational, litigation, and financial risk. Existing literature reveals several preconditions for compliance. However, much of the literature has adopted an internal view of compliance without considering external regulatory frameworks. This research draws on the cognitive model of regulation that looks at regulatory compliance as a social construct. It uses a triangulation research method comprising literature review, interview of trade compliance experts, and questionnaire survey of compliance practitioners to understand how regulation affects compliance and what role ICTs play in implementing compliance. The findings of this study present a regulatory compliance framework comprising four cognitive stages and a conceptual regulatory compliance system that presents how BDA and AI automation are applied to mitigate regulatory complexity and enhance regulatory compliance. The conceptual regulatory compliance system shows how BDA and AI enable institutions to dynamically assess regulatory risk, automatically monitor compliance, and intelligently predict risk violations mitigating regulatory complexity and preventing producing unnecessary documents. It provides theoretical contributions to understanding regulatory evolution and compliance and practical implications for understanding how regulation evolves to be more complicated and elements of a regulatory compliance system mitigate proliferating regulations. Additionally, it provides avenues for future research into the relationship between competing regulatory mandates and how institutions cope with that. Regulations are important for ensuring compliance and governance in finance and to curb systemic risk. Complying with regulations is difficult due to their growing volume, complexity, and fragmentation. Institutions use large-scale Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs), such as Big Data Analytics (BDA) and Artificial Intelligence (AI) automation, to monitor compliance and mitigate regulatory complexity. However, less is known about how firms comply with regulation. Most literature does not thoroughly investigate regulatory elements nor explicitly relate them to compliance.

Imagine a consumer financial services company with 20 million customers. Its sales and marketing organizations collaborate across product lines, deploying hundreds of marketing campaigns each quarter that aim to increase customer product usage and/or cross-buying of products. Each campaign is based on forecasts of customer responses derived from predictive models updated every quarter. The goals of these models are to achieve large return on investment ratios and to maximize contribution to local profit centers. What’s important is that their modeling is based only on data created, curated and maintained by these marketing organizations. The difference today is that the modeling is no longer based solely on a small number of response-determined variables that are constantly assessed in terms of importance. A quarterly campaign update generates hundreds of statistical models — involving campaign responses, purchase-lag time, the relative magnitude of the direct effect, and the cross-buying effects — using thousands of variables, including customer demographics, life stage, product transactions, household composition, and customer service history. It’s a network of models, not just a table of variable-by-residual importance values. But that’s only part of the story of data products. The predictive modeling utilized by these campaign plans is based on analytics and data preparation, which are data products in their most diminutive form. These products would be even more elementary were they not crafted quarterly by highly skilled, experienced modelers using advanced software and processes. Most companies have enough data to create models that contain not simply hundreds of variables, but thousands, so that the focus can return to information instead of data reduction. These models largely replace the internal econometric models previously used to produce advanced forecasts in the absence of campaign modeling. People used these forecasts to simulate ROI and contribution forecasts for the planned campaigns. In the old days, reliance on econometrically forecast ROI-guideline contribution values reduced the reliance on the marketing campaign modelers because of a lack of trust in their predictive ability.

Machine Learning (ML) and Artificial Intelligence (AI) are having an increasingly transformative impact on all industries and are already used in many mission-critical use cases in production, bringing considerable value. Data engineering, which combines ETL pipelines with other workflows managing data and machine learning operations, is also significantly impacted. The Intelligent Data Engineering and Automation framework offers the groundwork for intelligent automation processes. However, ML/AI are not the only disruptive forces; new Big Data technologies inspired by Web2.0 companies are also reshaping the Internet. Companies having the largest Big Data footprints not only provide applications with a Big Data operational model but also source their competitive advantage from data in the form of AI services and, consequently, impact the cost/performance equilibrium of ETL pipelines. All these technologies and reasons help explain why the traditional ETL pipeline design should adapt to current and emerging technologies and may be enhanced through artificial intelligence.

Predictive modeling, supported by machine learning technology, aims to analyze data in order to guide decision-making towards actions generating desired values in the future. It encompasses the set of techniques used to build models that estimate the value of a certain variable predicting a forthcoming event from the past or current values of relevant attributes. In predictive healthcare modeling, the built models represent the relationship among the data concerning customer, provider, production, and other aspects of the healthcare environment in order to assist the decision processes in the prevention of diseases and in the planning of preventive actions by detection of high-risk patients. Contrary to trend analysis, whose goal is to describe past events, predictive models aim to provide useful indications regarding future events and changes. Predictive healthcare modeling supports actions that try to prevent the manifestation of diseases in healthy individuals or try to diagnose as early as possible the incidence of a disease in patients at risk. A sound predictive analysis encompasses not only the model-training task, but also the aspects of data quality, preprocessing, and fusion during its entire implementation lifecycle to ensure appropriate input data preparation. The robustness of the predictive model and its results depends highly on data quality. Due to the variety of data sources in healthcare environments, it becomes essential to use preprocessing in order to remove noise and inconsistencies. The increasing number of endorsable data exchange standards makes each data exchange achievable, but it demands the implementation of a data-governance program. In addition, the influence of the hospital-database architect on the architecture of an early-diagnosis model is important to guarantee appropriate input-formatting modularity.

Data quality and data lineage are critical concerns for organizations mandated to comply with stringent regulatory regimes. This paper analyses the latest developments in the governance of data quality and data lineage within a regulated financial services organisation. It sets out the underlying regulatory context, describes the concepts employed in the business environment, summarizes how data quality is captured and monitored, examines the artefacts that record data lineage, reviews the roles and responsibilities of staff who implement the necessary processes, and maps areas where improvements are possible. The internal organization and processes of regulated data platforms are shaped not only by the capabilities prescribed by their technical architecture but also by the regulatory regimes under which they operate. These mandates, in particular, require rigorous examination of four aspects of data quality — accuracy, completeness, consistency, and timeliness — and detailed documentation of how data arrives in its final form in the repository. Although data monitoring, alerting, assessment, and remediation are well established, provenance capture remains an area ripe for further investment.

Healthcare is increasingly recognized as a data-intensive industry. Multi-hospital networks, among other organizations, face mounting operational and governance challenges because of rigid data-integration pipelines that support all data sources and destinations in the network. These pipelines have become difficult to modify, causing them to lag behind the changing needs of the clinical operation. Scalable data-pipeline architectures better support clinical decision making, optimize hospital operations, ease data quality and compliance concerns, and contribute to improved patient outcomes. Meeting scalability goals requires breaking up monolithic data-integration pipelines into smaller decoupled components and aligning service-level agreements of pipeline components and source systems. Parallelization and adoption of distributed data-warehouse technology mitigate the burden of ingesting data into a multi-hospital network. However, latency requirements still warrant the construction of separate pipelines for data ingress from clinical devices, electronic health records, and external laboratory-information systems. Healthcare associations recommend near real-time data availability for a growing list of clinical and operational applications. Mishandling the real-time ingestion of data from clinical devices, in particular, compromises availability and performance. Scalable architectural patterns for real-time streaming Ingestion from heterogeneous data sources, transport processes, and back-end processing structures are detailed.