Back to Article
Evaluation of the Critical risk factors in PPP - procured Mass Housing Projects in Abuja Nigeria - A fuzzy synthetic evaluation (FSE) approach
World Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture
| Vol 2, Issue 1
Table 2. Factor Reduction (Analysis) for Risk Variables in PPP ProcuredMass Housing Projects.
| Risk Factors | Risk Probability | Std. Deviation | Risk Severity | Std. Deviation | Risk impact | Normalized Value | Rank | Risk Criticality | ||||||
| Availability of Finance | 6.60 | 0.855 | 6.54 | 0.544 | 6.57 | 1.00 | 1 | Extremely High | ||||||
| High Finance cost | 6.27 | 0.740 | 6.22 | 0.540 | 6.25 | 0.87 | 2 | Very High | ||||||
| Corruption and lack of respect for Law | 6.06 | 0.446 | 6.03 | 0.408 | 6.04 | 0.78 | 3 | Very High | ||||||
| Non-involvement of the host community | 6.06 | 0.544 | 5.90 | 0.567 | 5.98 | 0.76 | 4 | Very High | ||||||
| Poor execution of Housing Policies | 6.06 | 0.471 | 5.88 | 0.516 | 5.97 | 0.75 | 5 | Very High | ||||||
| Wrong perception of housing need by low-income earners | 5.97 | 0.462 | 5.98 | 0.305 | 5.97 | 0.75 | 6 | Very High | ||||||
| Illegal Title to Land | 5.94 | 0.418 | 5.90 | 0.397 | 5.92 | 0.73 | 7 | Very High | ||||||
| Land acquisition and Site availability | 5.91 | 1.155 | 5.92 | 0.488 | 5.91 | 0.73 | 8 | Very High | ||||||
| Level of Demand for the mass housing projects | 5.82 | 0.808 | 5.83 | 0.458 | 5.83 | 0.69 | 9 | Very High | ||||||
| Inadequate experience in PPP | 5.75 | 0.749 | 5.79 | 0.512 | 5.77 | 0.67 | 10 | Very High | ||||||
| Unstable Value of Local Currency | 5.78 | 0.471 | 5.68 | 0.566 | 5.73 | 0.65 | 11 | Very High | ||||||
| Lack of creditworthiness | 5.67 | 0.787 | 5.68 | 0.690 | 5.67 | 0.63 | 12 | Very High | ||||||
| Inadequate distribution of responsibility and risks | 5.53 | 0.987 | 5.76 | 0.644 | 5.64 | 0.62 | 13 | Very High | ||||||
| Risk regarding Pricing of Product/service | 5.62 | 0.639 | 5.57 | 0.682 | 5.59 | 0.60 | 14 | Very High | ||||||
| Lack of Commitment from Public/Private Partners | 5.47 | 0.717 | 5.60 | 0.623 | 5.53 | 0.57 | 15 | Very High | ||||||
| Prolonged negotiation period prior to initiation | 5.55 | 0.758 | 5.48 | 0.586 | 5.52 | 0.56 | 16 | Very High | ||||||
| Construction time delay | 5.39 | 0.658 | 5.62 | 0.511 | 5.50 | 0.56 | 17 | Very High | ||||||
| Influential Economic Events (Boom/Recession) | 5.55 | 0.916 | 5.41 | 0.785 | 5.48 | 0.55 | 18 | High | ||||||
| High Bidding cost | 5.52 | 0.765 | 5.38 | 0.848 | 5.45 | 0.54 | 19 | High | ||||||
| Poor Financial Market | 5.43 | 0.792 | 5.46 | 0.963 | 5.45 | 0.54 | 20 | High | ||||||
| Inadequate distribution of Authority between Partners | 5.34 | 0.695 | 5.51 | 0.765 | 5.43 | 0.53 | 21 | High | ||||||
| Poor decision-making process | 5.38 | 0.800 | 5.45 | 0.604 | 5.41 | 0.52 | 22 | High | ||||||
| Financial attraction to project investors | 5.40 | 0.942 | 5.36 | 1.047 | 5.38 | 0.51 | 23 | High | ||||||
| Construction cost overrun | 5.26 | 0.602 | 5.50 | 0.567 | 5.38 | 0.51 | 24 | High | ||||||
| Force majeure | 5.17 | 0.957 | 5.54 | 1.033 | 5.36 | 0.50 | 25 | High | ||||||
| Delay in Project approvals and permits | 5.34 | 0.768 | 5.34 | 0.641 | 5.34 | 0.50 | 26 | High | ||||||
| Interest rate volatility | 5.19 | 0.824 | 5.47 | 0.760 | 5.33 | 0.50 | 27 | High | ||||||
| Change in Government | 5.24 | 0.788 | 5.30 | 1.073 | 5.27 | 0.50 | 28 | High | ||||||
| Inflation rate volatility | 5.39 | 0.802 | 5.06 | 0.992 | 5.22 | 0.50 | 29 | High | ||||||
| Land Grabbing/Encroachment | 4.95 | 0.852 | 5.52 | 0.770 | 5.22 | 0.50 | 30 | High | ||||||
| Public opposition to the mass housing projects | 5.22 | 1.088 | 5.15 | 1.286 | 5.19 | 0.50 | 31 | High | ||||||
| Weather | 5.11 | 0.871 | 5.08 | 1.092 | 5.09 | 0.39 | 32 | High | ||||||
| Operation cost overrun | 5.05 | 0.658 | 5.04 | 0.716 | 5.05 | 0.37 | 33 | High | ||||||
| Organization and Coordination risk | 4.90 | 0.975 | 4.92 | 0.805 | 4.91 | 0.31 | 34 | High | ||||||
| Inability to service debt | 4.81 | 0.813 | 4.99 | 0.895 | 4.90 | 0.31 | 35 | High | ||||||
| The bankruptcy of the investors (OPS) | 4.72 | 0.883 | 4.87 | 1.028 | 4.79 | 0.27 | 36 | High | ||||||
| Operational revenue below the projection | 4.69 | 0.622 | 4.80 | 0.719 | 4.74 | 0.25 | 37 | High | ||||||
| Lack of tradition of private provision of public services | 4.74 | 1.157 | 4.70 | 0.999 | 4.72 | 0.23 | 38 | High | ||||||
| Inconsistencies in Government Policies | 4.68 | 0.711 | 4.66 | 1.105 | 4.67 | 0.22 | 39 | High | ||||||
| Excessive contract variation | 4.43 | 0.715 | 4.93 | 0.832 | 4.68 | 0.22 | 40 | High | ||||||
| Competition risk | 4.74 | 0.618 | 4.55 | 0.837 | 4.64 | 0.20 | 41 | High | ||||||
| Different working methods/know-how between partners | 4.54 | 0.789 | 4.75 | 0.781 | 4.64 | 0.20 | 42 | High | ||||||
| Environment | 4.64 | 0.681 | 4.67 | 0.639 | 4.66 | 0.21 | 43 | High | ||||||
| Insolvency/default of Subcontractors and Suppliers | 4.25 | 0.655 | 5.02 | 0.873 | 4.62 | 0.19 | 44 | High | ||||||
| Third party tort liability | 4.57 | 0.657 | 4.61 | 0.692 | 4.59 | 0.18 | 45 | High | ||||||
| Availability of appropriate labour/material | 4.45 | 0.763 | 4.64 | 0.912 | 4.54 | 0.16 | 46 | High | ||||||
| Lack of Government guarantee | 4.39 | 1.001 | 4.70 | 1.091 | 4.54 | 0.16 | 47 | High | ||||||
| Low operating productivity | 4.41 | 0.823 | 4.59 | 0.619 | 4.50 | 0.14 | 48 | High | ||||||
| Rate of Return restrictions | 4.39 | 0.940 | 4.60 | 1.177 | 4.49 | 0.14 | 49 | Moderate | ||||||
| Legislation change/Inconsistencies | 4.28 | 0.715 | 4.68 | 0.861 | 4.47 | 0.13 | 50 | Moderate | ||||||
| Design deficiencies | 4.47 | 0.943 | 4.40 | 1.150 | 4.43 | 0.12 | 51 | Moderate | ||||||
| Geotechnical conditions | 4.12 | 0.895 | 4.79 | 0.946 | 4.45 | 0.12 | 52 | Moderate | ||||||
| Residual value (After concession period) | 4.47 | 0.764 | 4.38 | 0.771 | 4.42 | 0.11 | 53 | Moderate | ||||||
| Change in tax regulation | 4.50 | 0.795 | 4.29 | 1.016 | 4.40 | 0.10 | 54 | Moderate | ||||||
| Import and Export restriction | 4.19 | 0.645 | 4.49 | 0.625 | 4.33 | 0.08 | 55 | Moderate | ||||||
| Possible expropriation/nationalization of assets | 4.12 | 0.755 | 4.60 | 0.912 | 4.35 | 0.08 | 56 | Moderate | ||||||
| Industrial regulation change | 4.33 | 0.726 | 4.30 | 0.755 | 4.32 | 0.07 | 57 | Moderate | ||||||
| Unproven Engineering techniques | 4.20 | 0.719 | 4.45 | 0.694 | 4.32 | 0.07 | 58 | Moderate | ||||||
| Poor Quality of Workmanship | 4.12 | 0.754 | 4.48 | 0.814 | 4.30 | 0.06 | 59 | Moderate | ||||||
| Cultural differences between the main Stakeholders | 4.27 | 1.159 | 4.23 | 1.189 | 4.25 | 0.04 | 60 | Moderate | ||||||
| Staff crises | 4.11 | 0.686 | 4.36 | 0.589 | 4.23 | 0.03 | 61 | Moderate | ||||||
| Strong Political opposition | 4.21 | 0.685 | 4.14 | 0.913 | 4.17 | 0.01 | 62 | Moderate | ||||||
| Late design changes | 4.00 | 0.851 | 4.30 | 1.041 | 4.15 | 0.00 | 63 | Moderate | ||||||